Dragon Age Inquisition walkthrough
Our guide to the massive third game.
GTA 5 cheats and stock market guide
Every GTA 5 cheat code, plus a guide to making more money.
Loading... hold tight!
I said it was what the future has in store for us all. Digital distribution will be the primary means of game distribution, just wait and see. Now you do know what "future" means right? You do know that this does not mean "right now" right? Which is why having choices is good right? Even someone with a MuBrain should be able to figure this out.
And even in terms of exclusives did you read my quote from the DF article of Forza Horizon? Stuff like "best in class" and "almost untouchable".
As for "sticking to topics" you are the one who suggested that DF stated the PS3 was more capable.
So it is bad to have to buy an adapter (which only a few people needed) but it is okay to have to buy an expensive cable if you want to play your games library as advertised in HD?
And it's funny now to see how many people calling for Halo MCC to be released on multiple discs ;).
It is choice. I didn't need a wi-fi connection for the first 4 years I had my Xbox 360. Why the fuck should I have to pay for tech that I, and most people, don't have?
They sold a more capable games console. One with better online infrastructure.
It is choice. I didn't need a wi-fi connection for the first 4 years I had my Xbox 360. Why the fuck should I have to pay for tech that
Strange you forget to mention that and how expensive HDMI cables were back in 2006.
Where do DF say that these games are "conclusively" better than anything seen on the 360. Come on show us those quotes ;).
And as I said the Blu-Ray drive is not an example of "forward thinking". It was Sony making gamers pay more so that they could use the PS3 as a Trojan Horse for their movie disc format.
Wi-Fi was available for the 360. You had to buy an adapter. Why? Because when the 360 was released the majority of homes in the US and Europe did not have a Wi-Fi connection. Why make people pay more for something they don't need. Later models came with Wi-Fi when such connections became more prevalent. Ditto with HDMI connections (more TVs had DVI ports than HDMI ones). I prefer this more consumer-centric approach than forcing us to pay for unnecessary extras.
They do? Which ones? Show me a quote from any DF article which "conclusively" states that the PS3 "was more capable that the 360". Good luck with that.
And forward thinking tech? LOL! The Blu-Ray drive is not forward thinking tech. Going entirely digital with the PSP Go was (because that is the direction the media industry is taking). Didn't work so well for them ;).
The various face-offs DF have done conclusive show that the 360 is more capable than the PS3. It's fanboys like you (and your buddy Vizzini remember him) who have trouble with simple concepts like that. :cool:
So I guess DF are Xbox supporters...
The fact that the PS3 was overpriced and underpowered proves your point? LOL!
Here! Four times the failure rate of the Wii! I don't see you asking ilikegames101 for his sources
Some new footage has been released showing Halo 4 running 1080p60 for the first time and it looks better than anyone could of hoped. It makes Destiny (and even KZ:SF) look a little bit silly really. :cool:
Hostility to their "forward-thinking" platform? You mean hostility towards their over-priced and under-powered media center!
That its YLOD issues whilst far less prevalent than the RROD issues effecting the 360 were still above industry averages.
That cost far more than their competitors.
The PS3 (which I'm assuming you mean) had blu-ray, sure, and HDMI at launch (which the 360 did not have until later revisions), but those only make it forward-thinking, not 'future-proof'.
The 360 (which did have a version with a 20GB HDD at launch) and the PS3 also shared similar PowerPC architectures. The PS3 had a different approach with the SPEs, sure, and an nVidia GPU instead of AMD, but they are similar enough that I'm not getting why you claim the 360 is 'ill-engineered' compared to the PS3, considering IBM worked on both from similar specs.
IMO, the 360 had gone through a much more drastic evolution (HDD installs and USB storage being the 2 main ones) and, to me, improves the console experience, which was achieved through software updates.
I burned through four Xbox 360's in the space of eight years.
Actually the RRoD didn't really have that effect, it's hardware revisions that are responsible for the bulk of multiple sales.
Both Sony and MS need someone to keep them on their toes, and having both of them around and at each other's necks seems to be mostly working out well for all of us.
RROD was actually so bad at one point, that Microsoft had to release a 3 year warranty for Xbox 360's. It also cost them over 1 billion dollars in 2007 alone.
But...isn't that true for, well, both now-gen consoles, really?
It seems MS and Xbox are is a healthy state judging by those revenue numbers
umm, take your own advice? That's the best I got, since you asked.
youve got issues..
And remember kids, a Strong MS is good for PS4 owners too, because competition is good, right?
Disclaimer - I am a PC gamer who has yet to commit to a next-gen console.
He's got a personality disorder. I've blocked that joker & Eurogamer is 10 times better for it. I recommend everyone do the same, it'll drive him insane.
i was just trying to highlight that you can enjoy a game in spite of a review.
i also was puzzled why you decided to cut and paste the negatives of the review. what was your motivation for doing that.
i mean you was never going to like this was you as its an MS game and you have a blanket disliking of any game that is on a MS platform.
Still 30% higher than Driveclub. I don't need to bother copying quotes from that review, the score is enough. If we bring Horizon 2 into the picture it's a 40% difference. It must burn the Sony pony in you so much huh
you like driveclub even though you could quite easy cherry pick a whole host of negative comments from the review.
not my words. these are straight from the horses mouth. enough to put anyone off
Please stop, you're embarrassing yourself. And it's very distasteful to bash a game because MS hurt you. Thing is pretty obvious why you're being so obnoxious to a game you never played, it's because it's a Xbox exclusive, and that's silly coming from a grown man. Go away. In peace.
....take it your a pc pirate?
Says good old MuBrains. Are you and grassyknoll recruiting for your Sony Pony party?
To be fair, it's hard to argue with the rest of your response. My point still stands, though - listing all the points from your point of view is hardly a proof of anything, especially since many of those negatives you quoted may have positives attached.
Do all games scored an 8 have to be exactly as good as other games scored an 8? I would argue no.
For someone who doesn't like MS or the XO you do appear to post quitr a bit about them.
There really is no need for you to venture into futute XO exclusive game review/article in order to highlight the negatives about a console you don't own. Just let the XO owners discuss their games and console without your 2 cents. It would be a nice change and rather refreshing.
Because you answered my facts about yourself by doing the opposite doesn't erase your past, my friend. Are you turning over a new leaf? I doubt it.
And your justification that you only resort to name calling if someone does it first is really mature of you.
Fact: I've never read a comment by you saying a positive thing about MS without a negative dig in between.
Fact: I've read a lot of positive comments by you about Sony without a negative dig in between.
Fact: You have done a lot of name calling to people who disagree with you.
So you can make believe you are an objective commenter but history tells us different.
was not so much the words you cherry picked from the review, more you're dismissive meh looks boring comment at the end.
Fortunately, we don't review games by focusing only on the negatives. Apparently, you do. Good luck enjoying your life, buddy!
And as you've noticed, no one cares about your sense (cents). Who did you think you were going to influence with your biased comments?
be honest though, being a dyed in the wool sony fanboy you was never going to sing this games praises though was you.
@frazzl you are stupid.
No clue why Sony didn't push this harder on PS4 already. It was a perfect fall exclusive to counter the Halo hype.
And even in the Netherlands the decriminalization was highly limited. Marijuana use is still strictly regulated and surprise, surprise, with the weed passes, it's now regulated even more ;).
You are the one who's trying to use a comparison between 2 very different countries to support your legalization of drugs argument. Sadly that very page you link to provides more support for my statement than yours. I never said that legalizing drugs is the sole reason for this increase though. That's you once again talking out of your arse
Did you read the page? First table compares drug use in Netherlands to drug use in the USA. 2 completely different countries with different demographics, different economies and very different availability of elicit drugs. How this is proof of anything is a joke. The second table though is more telling and unsurprisingly you fail to mention it. Here it looks at drug usage in Netherlands only from 1997 to 2009. You can clearly see that the prevalence of drug use has increased in this time period, with the greatest increase seen in cannabis consumption. Which basically fits with what I have said.
Well in the 1800s it was a "deductible fact" that people couldn't fly and never would. Quite simply you have absolutely no factual basis to back your arguments. You are simply talking out of your arse. No surprise there given who you are :cool:
Pong or Ping, I forgot