Introducing the secret seekers and their eight-year quest
"If there's anything in reality that's not fun, we will change it."
Loading...hold tight!
Page
of 10 First / Last
Paulanator wrote:
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=173540
Also talks about the PS3 version of The Orange Box, and how it will struggle to match up to the 360/PC verions.
If you can read this you really need to fiddle with your forum settings.
Tonka wrote:
Flametastic
boabg wrote:This is the only thing that was swaying me towards getting one.... nice one Sony!
It's let me play my old PS1 games without actually looking my PS1 out. It's not a total waste.
D****** ******r
boabg wrote:The reason i haven't bought a PS3 yet! I still have a PS2 to play the PS1 games on
It's let me play my old PS1 games without actually looking my PS1 out. It's not a total waste.
Final Fantasy, Namco Museum etc... even with the recent price cuts/ hardware cuts i think it's still that little bit too expensive.
Fruit_Salad wrote:The PS3. They stupidly built Blu-Ray in.
Remind me whose console had the biggest design fault tho
LeD wrote:Blu-Ray is the best bit of the console, i am increasingly worried about the length of 360 games because of the DVD format.Fruit_Salad wrote:The PS3. They stupidly built Blu-Ray in.
Remind me whose console had the biggest design fault tho
Youthist wrote:/has flashbacks to reading Saturn Magazine
Surely is harder to get it to work like the other versions because its newer technology therefore developers need more time to learn the ins and outs? Then later in the life cycle the extra grunt will come to the fore and show the power of it over its rivals.
ecosse_011172 wrote:Even in a bastion of geekdom such as these forums.... it's all about the games. It always will be. Anything else is just masturbation.
Cell means GIGAFLOPZ, POWAH Marketing which Sony mistakenly thought the public give a shit about...
D****** ******r
disussedgenius wrote:Heh - yeah, maybe you are right....Who knows :-/Youthist wrote:/has flashbacks to reading Saturn Magazine
Surely is harder to get it to work like the other versions because its newer technology therefore developers need more time to learn the ins and outs? Then later in the life cycle the extra grunt will come to the fore and show the power of it over its rivals.
Hunam wrote:To be fair, Blu-Ray is the bit I've been using the most.LeD wrote:Blu-Ray is the best bit of the console, i am increasingly worried about the length of 360 games because of the DVD format.Fruit_Salad wrote:The PS3. They stupidly built Blu-Ray in.
Remind me whose console had the biggest design fault tho
.gif)
CrispyXUK wrote:Well, yes - instruction-wise. But the way the multi-core stuff is organised is completely different.Blerk wrote:Tis all powerpc innit.
Ouch!
Given the difficulty people have had porting PC and 360 stuff to the PS3, however... you've got to say he's probably not far wrong.
Sony would've done much better to have gone with a more standard architecture.
disussedgenius wrote:Well, no, since the Saturn was always technically inferior. PS3 isn't.Youthist wrote:/has flashbacks to reading Saturn Magazine
Surely is harder to get it to work like the other versions because its newer technology therefore developers need more time to learn the ins and outs? Then later in the life cycle the extra grunt will come to the fore and show the power of it over its rivals.
Youthist wrote:It's been out sometime in Japan you know, and the Dev's probably had kit before the console was released
Surely is harder to get it to work like the other versions because its newer technology therefore developers need more time to learn the ins and outs?
ecureuil wrote:Tell that to 2D!
Well, no, since the Saturn was always technically inferior. PS3 isn't.
thedaveeyres wrote:Nothing wrong with mastrubation.ecosse_011172 wrote:Even in a bastion of geekdom such as these forums.... it's all about the games. It always will be. Anything else is just masturbation.
Cell means GIGAFLOPZ, POWAH Marketing which Sony mistakenly thought the public give a shit about...
LeD wrote:All games like that are abit short, but Halo was criminally short, and as the 360 goes on, the more detailed the games are going to get whch requires more space, and procedural texturing uses uncompressed textures off the disc, which is also going to hamper game length.Hunam wrote:To be fair, Blu-Ray is the bit I've been using the most.LeD wrote:Blu-Ray is the best bit of the console, i am increasingly worried about the length of 360 games because of the DVD format.Fruit_Salad wrote:The PS3. They stupidly built Blu-Ray in.
Remind me whose console had the biggest design fault tho
I hear what you say about game's length, but in real terms I think 12 to 18 hours is just about what I have time for. Not that I can't fit the time, it's just hard to stay focused and motivated if a game drags on for hours on end.
Edith Piaf:
Don't forget that HS is only 6-8 hours in spite of Blu-Ray, while AC is 20 to 30 hours, and fits on a DVD.
Page
of 10 First / Last
