TV Licensing - where do I stand? Page 5

  • Page

    of 9 First / Last

  • ZuluHero 16 Apr 2013 14:34:52 5,158 posts
    Seen 8 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    TheSaint wrote:
    Not a great deal of difference between ITV and BBC1 in my opinion, I try and avoid both of them.
    Have you seen some of the documentaries on the BBC? Amazing! THAT'S the difference between ITV and BBC, and it's as different as night and day :)
  • localnotail 16 Apr 2013 14:52:59 23,084 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    rudedudejude wrote:
    Radio 4 is nice, but some of the comedy on there is 100% cringeworthy.
    I am not a fan of some of it (wish Count Arthur Strong would die) but Radio 4 has been the birthplace of some brilliant comedy that has gone on to TV, including The League of Gentleman and of course On The Hour (-> The Day Today, Brass Eye, Alan Partridge).
  • X201 16 Apr 2013 14:56:55 17,357 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    localnotail wrote:
    rudedudejude wrote:
    Radio 4 is nice, but some of the comedy on there is 100% cringeworthy.
    (wish Count Arthur Strong would die)
    I wouldn't go that far (just a lifetime banishment from all forms of broadcasting would suffice), but I agree with the sentiment. It strikes me as a very very poor attempt at a Shuttleworths rip-off.
  • Deleted user 16 April 2013 15:41:47
    ZuluHero wrote:
    TheSaint wrote:
    Not a great deal of difference between ITV and BBC1 in my opinion, I try and avoid both of them.
    Have you seen some of the documentaries on the BBC? Amazing! THAT'S the difference between ITV and BBC, and it's as different as night and day :)
    When stuff like Horizon and Attenborough docs are held up in high regard you know we're in trouble. Tosh, the lot of it, sadly
  • Deleted user 16 April 2013 15:50:50
    A lot of the best stuff on the Beeb makes a fortune from being sold abroad, so I do wonder how much they require the license fee for it.

    Also ITV isn't the only ad-funded channel. Channel 4 has extremely high broadcasting standards for the most part, and can stand toe-to-toe with the beeb in terms of comedy output and news.
  • TheSaint 16 Apr 2013 15:58:29 16,584 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    ZuluHero wrote:
    TheSaint wrote:
    Not a great deal of difference between ITV and BBC1 in my opinion, I try and avoid both of them.
    Have you seen some of the documentaries on the BBC? Amazing! THAT'S the difference between ITV and BBC, and it's as different as night and day :)
    Some people would probably argue that the ITV dramas like Downtown are far superior than their BBC counterparts so as I say not a great deal to choose between them. I don't think the typical EG user is the target demographic for either of these channels though.
  • faux-C 16 Apr 2013 15:58:47 11,111 posts
    Seen 6 minutes ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Blah blah ITV, Channel 4. Come back when commercial broadcasting comes up with an equivalent to the World Service.

    The BBC is one of the only things we can be genuinely proud of in this country, and long may it stay that way.
  • CosmicFuzz 16 Apr 2013 16:01:06 30,439 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Channel five was great until they stopped showing porn late on a friday night.
  • Deleted user 16 April 2013 16:07:06
    faux_carnation wrote:
    Blah blah ITV, Channel 4. Come back when commercial broadcasting comes up with an equivalent to the World Service.

    The BBC is one of the only things we can be genuinely proud of in this country, and long may it stay that way.
    This is nothing to do with the license discussion. Nobody is asking for the Beeb to be abolished. The question is whether its funding model is necessary (and perhaps even immoral).
  • faux-C 16 Apr 2013 16:13:17 11,111 posts
    Seen 6 minutes ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    kalel wrote:
    faux_carnation wrote:
    Blah blah ITV, Channel 4. Come back when commercial broadcasting comes up with an equivalent to the World Service.

    The BBC is one of the only things we can be genuinely proud of in this country, and long may it stay that way.
    This is nothing to do with the license discussion. Nobody is asking for the Beeb to be abolished. The question is whether its funding model is necessary (and perhaps even immoral).
    I think there's too many people discussing the merits of ITV vs BBC1, which is what I was getting at.

    There's no doubt that BBC1 could survive as a commercial station with ads. The importance of the license fee IMHO is to pay for things which could not support themselves commercially; that's the real public service which is facilitated by it. It would be fairer and easier to just take it as a tax directly from everyone in the country regardless of how much media they consume. Then there's be no quibbling over who does and doesn't need a TV license. I have a feeling that's an idea that will go down like a lead balloon though.
  • Dougs 16 Apr 2013 16:13:20 78,087 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    X201 wrote:

    The Govt. ring-fenced £600 million but it came in under budget and the Beeb are handing back almost half.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/apr/19/bbc-digital-switchover-funds
    Most of which is being used to as a Govt subsidy for superfast broadband in rural areas.
  • ZuluHero 16 Apr 2013 16:15:12 5,158 posts
    Seen 8 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    TheSaint wrote:
    ZuluHero wrote:
    TheSaint wrote:
    Not a great deal of difference between ITV and BBC1 in my opinion, I try and avoid both of them.
    Have you seen some of the documentaries on the BBC? Amazing! THAT'S the difference between ITV and BBC, and it's as different as night and day :)
    Some people would probably argue that the ITV dramas like Downtown are far superior than their BBC counterparts so as I say not a great deal to choose between them. I don't think the typical EG user is the target demographic for either of these channels though.
    I agree :)
  • Dougs 16 Apr 2013 16:20:55 78,087 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    Downton rocks!
  • Deleted user 16 April 2013 16:33:12
    I personally think people overstate the importance of things like the world service. I certainly don't think it's so utterly fundamental that it should effectively be a tax that we all pay for without choice.
  • Deleted user 16 April 2013 16:34:52
    Incidentally the world service will only start being funded by the license from next year. It never has been in the past.
  • rudedudejude 16 Apr 2013 16:35:41 2,309 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    It would be fairer and easier to just take it as a tax directly from everyone in the country regardless of how much media they consume.
    That's almost how it is currently done, it's a tax to receive broadcast TV channels no matter how much of those you consume. They just put a small proviso in there that you must watch broadcast tv.

    I think you're suggesting every single UK resident be taxed this amount which would be quite strange. I guess if it worked out as something like £5 each it woulnd't be too bad. But then maybe everyone would get a vote in how it's ran or something?
  • Dougs 16 Apr 2013 16:40:58 78,087 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    kalel wrote:
    I personally think people overstate the importance of things like the world service. I certainly don't think it's so utterly fundamental that it should effectively be a tax that we all pay for without choice.
    Interestingly, it wouldn't get past Europe these days, on state aid and competition grounds. It only survives as it's historical
  • faux-C 16 Apr 2013 16:41:20 11,111 posts
    Seen 6 minutes ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    rudedudejude wrote:
    It would be fairer and easier to just take it as a tax directly from everyone in the country regardless of how much media they consume.
    That's almost how it is currently done, it's a tax to receive broadcast TV channels no matter how much of those you consume. They just put a small proviso in there that you must watch broadcast tv.

    I think you're suggesting every single UK resident be taxed this amount which would be quite strange. I guess if it worked out as something like £5 each it woulnd't be too bad. But then maybe everyone would get a vote in how it's ran or something?
    Why would it be strange? We all have to pay for a standing army which is completely irrelevant to most people's lives and we get no say in how that's run. The BBC does more good work for Britain abroad than any amount of army could do.
  • EMarkM 16 Apr 2013 16:41:30 4,175 posts
    Seen 10 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    X201 wrote:
    EMarkM wrote:

    What other organisations receive money from the licence fee?
    See the link I posted above, Govt. is using license fee cash to fund broadband and the "Local TV" plan.
    I'll have a look; thanks :)
  • caligari 25 Apr 2013 21:22:27 17,407 posts
    Seen 6 days ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    I had a change of heart and asked them to keep up my monthly Direct Debits.

    I do listen to quite a bit of football on Radio 5 - and regularly use the website for news/iPlayer (for the odd episode of QI - if nothing else). It would be a bit mean of me to expect it for free whilst others fund it.

    Edited by caligari at 21:29:46 25-04-2013
  • Rivuzu 12 May 2016 11:54:55 13,820 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Relevant bump. TV licence to continue for at least 11 years. On-demand users using the iPlayer will now have to pay. Fee to rise with inflation.

    I was tempted to bin off my entire package and go only digital this year. Not so sure now. :l
  • CosmicFuzz 12 May 2016 12:01:10 30,439 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Fair enough really. I wouldn't expect to watch Netflix without paying for it, iPlayer shouldn't be any different. I don't pay for a license at the moment as we don't watch broadcast TV, but figured it was only a matter of time until they tied iPlayer catch up into the fee.
  • Alastair 12 May 2016 12:03:17 19,057 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    How will they link it?
    Will iPlayer be updated to require licence details to be entered? Seems a feasible way to do it.
  • CosmicFuzz 12 May 2016 12:06:28 30,439 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Yeah I imagine that'll be it. Pay the licence, get a code in the mail, stick it into iplayer account.
  • Cappy 12 May 2016 12:06:30 12,906 posts
    Seen 12 seconds ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    I haven't watched TV in a couple of years now, I don't miss it at all.

    I'm just glad the BBC didn't get it's wish of a direct tax on everybody irrespective of whether they use the service or not.

    The BBC should live or die on it's own merit.
  • THFourteen 12 May 2016 12:09:47 40,613 posts
    Seen 19 minutes ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Rivuzu wrote:
    Relevant bump. TV licence to continue for at least 11 years. On-demand users using the iPlayer will now have to pay. Fee to rise with inflation.

    I was tempted to bin off my entire package and go only digital this year. Not so sure now. :l
    Good.

    people shouldnt get it for free
  • Psiloc 12 May 2016 12:10:10 3,074 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    More likely they'll start requiring ISPs to hand over the details of people they think are accessing the service without a license.
  • Page

    of 9 First / Last

Log in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.