New Star Trek Page 138

  • Page

    of 184 First / Last

  • CosmicFuzz 27 Nov 2012 07:01:31 29,073 posts
    Seen 5 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Also pretty much confirms it's Gary Mitchell.
  • Scurrminator 27 Nov 2012 09:11:08 8,591 posts
    Seen 18 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    CosmicFuzz wrote:
    Also pretty much confirms it's Gary Mitchell.
    This
  • mcmonkeyplc 3 Dec 2012 10:47:07 39,936 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    Teaser Poster

    SCHWING!
  • Gambit1977 3 Dec 2012 10:49:29 10,389 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    That's ridiculous. It's TDKR with a raincoat. Surely it's just a joke?
  • mcmonkeyplc 3 Dec 2012 11:00:03 39,936 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    No. It's real. I think of far worse things to rip off than TDKR.

    Also apparently that's London.
  • kosigan 3 Dec 2012 11:06:27 517 posts
    Seen 2 weeks ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    @mcmonkeyplc - there's a building on the right-hand side that looks somewhat like "the Gherkin", so it could well be.
  • Gambit1977 3 Dec 2012 11:10:53 10,389 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    @mcmonkeyplc so can I, but it's a bit early for a rip off. J
  • mcmonkeyplc 3 Dec 2012 11:21:53 39,936 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    kosigan wrote:
    @mcmonkeyplc - there's a building on the right-hand side that looks somewhat like "the Gherkin", so it could well be.
    It's not just that. Reading the empire article, you can also make out Tower 42, the Lloyds building, the shard and apparently the London eye. Although I can't see the eye.
  • nickthegun 3 Dec 2012 11:26:20 64,526 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    I still cant get onboard with the lack of a colon, hyphen or any other delineation between ‘star trek’ and ‘into darkness’. It just sounds like a bad joke.
  • Deleted user 3 December 2012 11:34:49
    Gambit1977 wrote:
    That's ridiculous. It's TDKR with a raincoat. Surely it's just a joke?
    this. But still looking forward to it!
  • Razz 3 Dec 2012 11:36:18 62,322 posts
    Seen 2 minutes ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    I think that's Benedict Cucumberpatch standing there
  • Deleted user 3 December 2012 11:38:41
    its looks a bit like chris pine. Hope he doesn't wear leather and sunglasses and listens to 80s glam metal because his evil.....
  • Scurrminator 3 Dec 2012 11:38:54 8,591 posts
    Seen 18 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    It certainly is. Also the teaser (it's only just over a minute long) will be out by weeks end; I'm guessing Friday :-)
    London eye is bottom left corner by the way - Larger res here
  • mcmonkeyplc 3 Dec 2012 11:41:06 39,936 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    Ah yes that's a much better picture!

    /Jizztime
  • mcmonkeyplc 3 Dec 2012 11:45:53 39,936 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    You can also see St Pauls.

    That is definitely London.

    I'm assuming this is a global poster seeing as it's been posted by the Star Trek facebook page.

    I wonder if they'll have 1 a day until the trailer at the end of the week with a different city everyday.

    I can't imagine the film focusing on London. I'd love it if it did but I can't see it.
  • CosmicFuzz 3 Dec 2012 14:06:00 29,073 posts
    Seen 5 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Can see the whole one each day thing happening. Put different character in each one with different location. Then trailer! So excited.

    And empire say the first 9 minutes are still a go for hobbit, thought it had been revealed as not happening?
  • Scurrminator 3 Dec 2012 14:28:33 8,591 posts
    Seen 18 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Not sure where you heard that...All Cineworld IMAXs are confirmed as having the footage.
  • RichieTenenbaum 3 Dec 2012 18:47:12 2,250 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Excellent comment on AVClub

    "It's a relief to see Star Trek, at long last, returning to its roots as a dour exercise in British dystopianism."
  • morriss 3 Dec 2012 19:27:15 71,284 posts
    Seen 3 months ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    He has to shout: KHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNN or I want my money back.
  • RichieTenenbaum 3 Dec 2012 19:36:51 2,250 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    I really think it's gonna be a big bag o shite. People say they like the first one but I hated it. It showed almost no idea of what made Trek great. It wasn't even fun. It was just a big dumb action movie like most other big dumb action movies. It felt like fuckig Transformers.
  • Deleted user 3 December 2012 19:41:26
    RichieTenenbaum wrote:
    Excellent comment on AVClub

    "It's a relief to see Star Trek, at long last, returning to its roots as a dour exercise in British dystopianism."
    Nothing excellent, witty or clever about it. It isn't the 60s and no one wants to see that shite any more.
  • Deleted user 3 December 2012 19:42:13
    It was nothing like Transformers. There's something seriously wrong with you, like 95% of Star Trek fans.
  • captbirdseye 3 Dec 2012 19:51:25 6,294 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Steve_Perry wrote:
    It was basically Transformers with Star Trek characters and iconography.

    Transformers has less plot holes though.
    Jesus! No words can describe how wrong that statement is. Trek fans for the lols.
  • varsas 3 Dec 2012 20:26:57 2,494 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    mcmonkeyplc wrote:
    Teaser Poster

    SCHWING!
    I quite like it though I do wonder how the London skyline fits into things.

    Hopefully it'll have the energy of first film!

    Edited by varsas at 20:30:35 03-12-2012
  • morriss 3 Dec 2012 20:46:40 71,284 posts
    Seen 3 months ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    RichieTenenbaum wrote:
    I really think it's gonna be a big bag o shite. People say they like the first one but I hated it. It showed almost no idea of what made Trek great. It wasn't even fun. It was just a big dumb action movie like most other big dumb action movies. It felt like fuckig Transformers.
    lolwut
  • Deleted user 3 December 2012 21:16:37
    Steve_Perry wrote:
    Its full of plot holes and has a story that's about on par with something like Transformers, where it doesn't matter if nothing makes sense as long as you have lens flare, pew pew pew and 19 years olds having a drama about something.
    So...it was a Star Trek film + lens flares.
  • Load_2.0 3 Dec 2012 21:34:45 21,094 posts
    Seen 2 minutes ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    I am a fan, TOS, STNG, Voyager I have seen every episode, STNG and TOS several times.

    It was nothing like Transformers and was very much in keeping with previous Trek movies.
  • Gambit1977 3 Dec 2012 22:04:12 10,389 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    I love Trekkies. Like they think it's some super cerebral philosophy or something. They're all just dumb fun flicks with nothing to say.

    I enjoyed the new star trek for what it was, popcorn.
  • Page

    of 184 First / Last

Log in or register to reply