|How much of an angle?|
The Eurogamer HDTV Guide • Page 116
Pageof 164 First / Last
gammonbanter 1,564 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 8 years ago
wizardofoz85 wrote:A man will find any fault with his HDTV and fixate on it for ever, only the truly wise will let it go and enjoy their telly warts 'n' all!
Yeah, I recently bought the 40w905. Excellent for everything I've thrown at it so far.
I'm just playing Tales of Vesperia at the moment which I've had for a few years but never got around to playing and it looks pretty good.
The only issue I've noticed with it so far is the pink tinge noted on avforums if you look at it from an angle but I've found it to happen at an angle I'd never actually watch/play at
/has had screen replaced for clouding the size of a 2p coin
Edited by gammonbanter at 04:54:33 20-09-2013
Maturin 3,680 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 6 years ago
I agree with that. We are often intolerant of tiny flaws that never would have bothered us in the CRT days before we became obsessed with such things.
My model of TV in my study has a slight clouding issue. And the only time it is remotely visible is on the plain white menus - never actually when watching something. But I've seen AVForum rants about it and I think - crikey you're getting a great TV for a low price, calm down.
Blakester 3,847 posts
Seen 57 minutes ago
Registered 11 years ago
I've got the 55w905 and it's a wonderful TV with brilliant motion handling and deep blacks.
It does have the pink tinge when viewed from an angle, so not ideal if you're not watching head-on for a considerable amount of time.
wizardofoz85 314 posts
Seen 10 months ago
Registered 7 years ago
@Errol well, the only time I've actually noticed it is when I'm standing directly in front of the TV either looking at it from above whilst changing discs or directly to it's side. Normal use I've never noticed it.
It's my gaming/movie bedroom TV so I usually look at it directly from the front and if I'm honest am not gonna go looking for any faults with it if I can't see them in "normal" use for me.
TV in my room will be in a corner so people will be watching it from an angle. Guess I might have to go and check out the sony in a shop.
Ive recently bought a Panasonic TX-L50DT65B LED but cant find any calibration settings for gaming, would anyone be able to help?
Also the TV has an option in the menu for RGB range. Should i have it on normal or full? Thanks.
ecu 78,176 posts
Seen 37 minutes ago
Registered 11 years ago
Oh that sucks.
So, upgrade to something like a ZT or VT over the next 6 months, or wait a couple of years more for much more expensive 4K set.
Wow, that's a lot more surprising than Pioneer stopping Plasma production a few years back. Panasonic screens are far more mainstream.
Not a big fan of Panny screens, but still a shame, they are still far better than LCDs.
They really are not, if were talking flagship LCD edge enhanced panels. When most of the content benefits more from pixel accuracy rather than the slightly better shades of grey in daylight, top of the line 4k LCD/LED hybrids produce a better balanced result. The three competing TV technologies (four if we include LCD of old or five with OLED) have gotten to the stage where improving contrast is probably the least benefit you'll get. Sharpness, colour accuracy and motion processing are far more important to enhance games, blu-ray and tv sports content.
Quite a lot of friends bought into the plasma technology and content never looks crisp enough on their sets imo, regardless of how good other aspects of the picture are.
@vizzini They really are. I've never seen any LCD that can match the deep, natural looking picture a Plasma can produce. LCDs look raspy and artificial.
I've also never seen an LCD match the black levels of a plasma without looking crushed and losing shadow detail. Or one that can handle motion as well as a Plasma.
Speaking of crispness, sure, looking sharp and bright is one of LCD's strengths, but to their detriment imo. Plasmas just look nicer and more natural. LCDs look artificially sharp and bright, it's a showroom style picture, not a nice filmic picture.
I just don't get that assessment of LCD hybrid technology, how natural or bright the image looks is how you adjust the TV, whereas you can't transcend the sharpness issues of Plasma or over whitening of LED at full contrast.
Plasma just never feels like a proper step up from the best of CRT (like a KD-36X200) for colour or contrast or motion. Whereas flagship LCDs and LCD hybrids get close enough on all those issues, but equally show off the extra resolution (in the content) through the precision of the pixel technology. Even my current X3000 still looks strong for gaming and HD sport compared to one or two flagship Plasmas I've used.
Basically, I'm currently in the market to buy a flagship TV; probably 4K, and certainly wouldn't look past LCD hybrids of the 4K KD 55X9000 variety. Reviews place it as a big step up from the best 1080p TV I've ever seen(across all material), and that was a KDL-55HX853 that my friend bought last year.
Edited by vizzini at 20:23:42 01-11-2013
It's a vizzini vs rumblesushi knowledge-off
Edited by Youthist at 19:22:16 01-11-2013
And vizzini loses, again. Can't tell what plasmas he's looked at, but they cannot be recent Panasonics.
Let me match your idiocy with an equally baseless point.
“And bremenacht loses again”
And yes, one was a recent flagship Pioneer and the other was a recent flagship Panasonic. They still looked really good, but not to the extent I thought I needed to replace my 4-5year old LCD TV to buy one of those. Unlike the HX8 which sent me home quite dejected about my old screen.
I got it in first, which gains one point. You copied, which loses you one point.
Hence, I win; you lose.
These recent flagship plasmas were Pioneer and Panasonic? Name them then, 'cos I don't believe you.
Edited by Bremenacht at 21:02:29 01-11-2013
Recent Pioneer lol.
You really want me to track down model numbers of TVs I wasn't going to buy?
The people I'm discussing are like you and I, except they change their TVs every 18months. If they claim they bought the latest flagship Pioneer or Panasonic at their screen size(bigger than 46”) with the best part of £2000, I trust that's what they've bought; especially when one of them sent back a flagship LED as faulty when he replaced his previous 2year old flagship Panasonic. We are talking Tvs no older than the Sony Hx8.
But what is the point in me having a discussion with you, if from the word go you don't trust what I'm telling you? I've got nothing to gain from this conversation, as you can always play the I don't believe you card when it doesn't go your way.
Well, the flagship Panny costs well over £2k, and Pioneer stopped making plasmas in 2009.
So you are saying people haven't been able to buy the best of Pioneer Tvs for 4 years?
And flagship ~50" panny more than £2000 even at trade price?
Yes, and don't know.
Oh and the "flagship" penny is 60".
So you agree that the pioneers aren't very good to compare to modern LCD hybrids for picture quality, as they aren't good enough?
And the definition of flagship typically means any size that has the top-end signal processing, eg in Sony that would be the Bravia “Pro” signal processing.
But you are hardly going to say you need to spend £20K to have a flagship LG now are you?
You've talked yourself round in a circle. Just shush.
And the flagship panny with the top end processing only comes in one size. Again, just shush. Your endless know-it-all yet actually know-nothing drivel is tedious beyond belief.
Yeah right? So now your going to split hairs over the best ~50” models not being flagships; even though they have nothing better at that massive size and still costing the best part of £2000?
The way people ignorantly talk about the virtues of plasma technology, you'd think any of them should be far more impressive than all LCD hybrid technology above about £1200.
My original point was that a flagship LCD hybrid is overall better, and especially for gaming where pixel accuracy is required to see the resolution benefits. Which should be an important aspect to gamers on a gaming website. But ok, as you were.
I bought a 43" Samsung plasma a couple of weeks back and it's ace. I love the fact that, aside from the standby light being red, you can't even tell if it's on or off if it's displaying a completely black screen.
The final iteration of a Kuro still beats the shit out of any LCD I've seen, and that definitely includes your 4 or 5 year old one. Not even in the same league of picture quality.
It's like saying a 3DS has a better screen than a Vita
I love this shit