Guy Fawkes protests - why is a suicide bomber held in such high regard

  • Page

    of 3 First / Last

    Previous
  • LetsGo 6 Nov 2013 12:59:19 5,937 posts
    Seen 10 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Why is Guy Fawkes, a guy who hated the political system and wanted to kill innocent civilians instead of going through democratic means, held in such high regard by protesters who are protesting about political change?

    Could the same be said about Taliban suicide bombers who want to change political systems in Afghanistan?

    Both are wrong and should not be celebrated in this way IMO.

    Edited by LetsGo at 13:01:53 06-11-2013
  • LetsGo 6 Nov 2013 13:03:01 5,937 posts
    Seen 10 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Deckard1 wrote:
    Its celebrating him failing you mong. Hence why you throw him on a fire.
    I am not talking about that, I'm talking about the protests outside parliament with people wearing Guy Fawkes masks, celebrating how is was a hero for political change.
  • LetsGo 6 Nov 2013 13:03:27 5,937 posts
    Seen 10 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Deckard1 wrote:
    Which isn't what you were talking about but hey. He's a symbol of revolution, thats it really.
    Fair enough :). But that's not right right way to go about revolution.

    Edited by LetsGo at 13:03:59 06-11-2013
  • neilka Funniest Forumite, 2014 6 Nov 2013 13:04:10 16,905 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I think it's from a film or something.

    AVOID

  • Mr_Sleep 6 Nov 2013 13:05:46 17,727 posts
    Seen 52 minutes ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    V for Vendetta innit.

    You are a factory of sadness.

  • DFawkes 6 Nov 2013 13:09:55 24,950 posts
    Seen 5 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Wasn't it less to do with revolution, and more to do with simply killing the Protestant King and replacing him with someone Catholic instead? Also what LB said.

    Grghl fnarr, grhl gnnrl! - Christina Bale as Batman

  • LetsGo 6 Nov 2013 13:12:52 5,937 posts
    Seen 10 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    DFawkes wrote:
    Wasn't it less to do with revolution, and more to do with simply killing the Protestant King and replacing him with someone Catholic instead? Also what LB said.
    He intended to destroy parliament whilst it was in session including killing himself.

    That is a suicide bomber.

    He said that under torture so you could argue he just said it.
  • Deleted user 6 November 2013 13:12:59
    The revolution part mainly comes from V for vendetta. People getting the two mixed up.

    Edited by SG59 at 13:13:58 06-11-2013
  • craigy Staff 6 Nov 2013 13:14:22 7,788 posts
    Seen 58 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Bit of a mixup going on here.
  • Kew1Melon 6 Nov 2013 13:16:13 480 posts
    Seen 3 weeks ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    The mask is used as a symbol of political descent. In the film, V blows up a corrupt governing body. He's an extreme voice of the people.

    You have an imagination barrier.

  • nickthegun 6 Nov 2013 13:17:58 62,533 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Ironically, the guy fawkes mask things comes from the wachowskis misunderstanding the point of V for Vendetta.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    funkula

  • Deleted user 6 November 2013 13:20:07
    @LetsGo He was simply there to watch the gunpowder and light the fuse when parliament opened. He got caught though.

    Guy Fawkes was one of a small group of Catholics who felt that the government was treating Roman Catholics unfairly. They hoped that King James 1st would change the laws, but he didn't. So they took action.
  • MrTomFTW Moderator 6 Nov 2013 13:23:05 41,067 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    According to Wikipedia the plan was to light the fuse and scarper across the Thames. But hey, Wikipedia so you never know.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder_Plot#Monteagle_letter

    Follow me on Twitter: @MrTom

  • DFawkes 6 Nov 2013 13:25:06 24,950 posts
    Seen 5 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    LetsGo wrote:
    He intended to destroy parliament whilst it was in session including killing himself.
    Ah, I wasn't aware of that. I'd always thought it likely he intended not to be blow up, hence him being found with a pocket watch to time the fuses properly. I'd have thought if you're really intending to blow up with it, you'd do it manually to ensure you've done it right.

    Just conjecture on my part, obviously. It just seems if he was a suicide bomber, he wasn't a very good one (assuming he hadn't been caught, obviously). But that could've been just to time the secondary explosions, so I suppose it could've been either way.

    Grghl fnarr, grhl gnnrl! - Christina Bale as Batman

  • Deleted user 6 November 2013 13:25:31
    LetsGo strikes again.
  • vijay_UK 6 Nov 2013 13:26:16 2,754 posts
    Seen 14 minutes ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    @DFawkes

    You're not related are you, by chance?
  • Tonka 6 Nov 2013 13:27:02 22,087 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Mr_Sleep wrote:
    V for Vendetta innit.

    If you can read this you really need to fiddle with your forum settings.

  • StarchildHypocrethes 6 Nov 2013 13:28:21 27,199 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    RIP Guy Fawkes
  • Cappy 6 Nov 2013 13:29:03 12,281 posts
    Seen 14 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Guy Fawkes' plan was to be a safe distance away from the Houses of Parliament when the gunpowder ignited. So, more like the IRA than tactics associated with Al-Qaeda.

    The fate of Guy is pretty horrifying, the criminal justice system of the day still clung to a lot of Medieval 'traditions', it wasn't exactly a fair and just society and the Parliamentarians weren't exactly innocent.

    Edited by Cappy at 13:31:06 06-11-2013
  • Grax 6 Nov 2013 13:29:25 2,583 posts
    Seen 45 minutes ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    yeah, no suicide for Guy Fawkes, the plan was to light and scarper (though i guess he was always intended to be the scapegoat (not that he knew it)
  • TheSaint 6 Nov 2013 13:29:35 15,199 posts
    Seen 43 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I really don't think he was planning to kill himself. This is from the BBC history page:

    Back in London in October, with only weeks to go, the final details were planned. Fawkes was to light the fuse and escape to continental Europe. To coincide with the explosion, Digby would lead a rising in the Midlands and kidnap King James's daughter, Princess Elizabeth, ready to install her as a puppet queen. In Europe, Fawkes would be arguing the plotters' case to continental governments, to secure their passive acceptance, even support.
  • MrTomFTW Moderator 6 Nov 2013 13:30:58 41,067 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    I seem to remember he took a leap from the scaffolding as his mutilation/execution was about to begin, saving himself from that.

    But still, the torture would have been horrific.

    Follow me on Twitter: @MrTom

  • Page

    of 3 First / Last

    Previous
Log in or register to reply