Embracing Perma-death

  • Page

    of 2 First / Last

    Previous
  • INSOMANiAC 4 Jun 2013 14:20:05 3,855 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    I don't know about you, but whenever I play a game that involves perma-death,(X-com, Fire Emblem, even Zombiu etc)whenever a character dies I just cant accept the mistake and reload the game, kind of defeating the purpose of the whole mechanic. Games like Fire Emblem these days seem to expect you to it and the 'dead' characters are still in the cut scenes. I always want to carry on but I just can't do it!

    Anyway, I've decided my next perma-death game I'm going to embrace it and accept my fate, does anyone every actually do this though??

    Steam - iN5OMANiAC
    PSN - iN5OMANiCAL

  • Ziz0u 4 Jun 2013 14:23:18 8,781 posts
    Seen 37 seconds ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Give him one of your XCOM motivational speeches, LB :)
  • INSOMANiAC 4 Jun 2013 14:25:53 3,855 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    @LeoliansBro Doesnt Xcom get considerably harder though, because you're starting fresh recruits without any of the promotion perks. I'm certainly not ready for ironman mode yet!

    Steam - iN5OMANiAC
    PSN - iN5OMANiCAL

  • ZuluHero 4 Jun 2013 14:26:57 4,537 posts
    Seen 13 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    The only thing about these games is that they're brave enough to put these mechanics in then kind of chicken out of them by letting you reload. Sort of lessens (and devalues) the impact really.

    I try to play games in a way where I live with my choices (like Skyrim or Fallout etc), though in truth it depends what sort of game it is.

    I really like Demons/Dark Souls, as the game sort of forces you to live with your decisions (and mistakes! :p)

    I think that devs just need to be a bit braver when they implement systems like this, and I think it makes people play in a very different way as well, closer probably to what they originally intended at least.
  • Deleted user 4 June 2013 14:32:15
    Most people can't even accept the concept in real life, let alone in games.
  • jellyBelly 4 Jun 2013 14:33:57 585 posts
    Seen 9 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    @kalel surely this should be the other way round?

    PSN:lumulata, NN Dollodon

  • Deleted user 4 June 2013 14:50:47
    I always cop out and reload. Aliens on the DS had a similar mechanic so I sold it. Tbh, finding loopholes in games around these kinds of mechanics makes me feel more clever than if I had the book smarts to actually get good at whatever it is I'm trying to play.

    Edited by bitch_tits_zero_nine at 14:51:22 04-06-2013
  • graysonavich 4 Jun 2013 14:52:47 7,585 posts
    Seen 8 hours ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Practice with stuff like Skyrim. Play as 'hardcore' mode. If you die in game, you can't play the game for the rest of the day/week (if you're unemployed/employed)
  • mal 4 Jun 2013 15:00:08 23,699 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    I rarely 100% games, but that losing characters in Fire Emblem means you can't complete the relationship stuff means so far I've always quit and reloaded if I lose a character.

    Cubby didn't know how to turn off sigs!

  • SuperBas 4 Jun 2013 15:00:33 1,533 posts
    Seen 28 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Don't implement saving, or figure out a way to prevent saved games being copied. That last one would be ideal, but is hard to implement. There's your permadeath.

    Edited by SuperBas at 15:01:02 04-06-2013
  • THFourteen 4 Jun 2013 15:02:36 36,318 posts
    Seen 54 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Games are supposed to be fun, not hellish.

    I always reload if characters die. They should do away with that mechanic.

    i mean the whole diablo 3 hardcore mode... why!?!?
  • Benno 4 Jun 2013 15:03:18 10,825 posts
    Seen 54 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    I remember when Hideo Kojima said he wanted to make a game where when you die thats it... as in literally, you would need to buy a new copy of the game to play again. Would love to see how the internet would react to that one.
  • Spectral 4 Jun 2013 15:04:22 5,035 posts
    Seen 8 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    While it does kind of defeat the point it still forces you play a level much more carfully. At least in games that dont allow saves mid mission. Having to replay 30-40 mins with no mistakes is still a fairly big consequence in modern gaming.
  • Deleted user 4 June 2013 15:04:57
    Give EA ideas.
  • graysonavich 4 Jun 2013 15:06:04 7,585 posts
    Seen 8 hours ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    THFourteen wrote:
    Games are supposed to be fun, not hellish.

    I always reload if characters die. They should do away with that mechanic.

    i mean the whole diablo 3 hardcore mode... why!?!?
    Enjoyment in the challenge?
  • Deleted user 4 June 2013 15:08:09
    With perma-death comes a heightened sense of tension and fun. Steel Battalian was a unique experience because of it. If it's done right then it can really enhance an experience.
  • HandsomeCrab 4 Jun 2013 15:15:14 279 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 6 years ago

    GT: carlmadin

  • neilka Funniest Forumite, 2014 4 Jun 2013 15:42:07 16,947 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Mr. Resetti has killed many children.

    AVOID

  • nickthegun 4 Jun 2013 15:58:24 63,362 posts
    Seen 4 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I stopped playing Oblivion when Lydia vanished in the middle of a fight. One minute im scrapping with those ghosty things outside hogwarts, the next she has vanished.

    Searched for her for ten minutes, turned the 360 off and never played it again.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    funkula

  • graysonavich 4 Jun 2013 16:25:34 7,585 posts
    Seen 8 hours ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    :forever alone:
  • elstoof 4 Jun 2013 17:18:52 9,234 posts
    Seen 10 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    I'm still trying to get through the first level of Camnon Fodder.
  • mrharvest 4 Jun 2013 19:27:09 5,268 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    I've grown up on roguelikes so permadeath is just fine in my opinion. Try Unreal World - you can't reload. It just deletes your save when you die.
  • Slint1000 4 Jun 2013 19:35:10 3,087 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    State of Decay sounds like it has perma death which makes it sound even more appealing than I originally thought.

    Mind you I hope it those deaths don't happen in really stupid ways like it did to me when my Hardcore Torchlight character got nearly to the end of the game then died because I got him stuck on an opening/closing door that squished me when I wasn't even that close to it.

    I never played it again after that because it was such a crappy way to go!
  • thegofp 4 Jun 2013 19:40:43 169 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    Benno wrote:
    I remember when Hideo Kojima said he wanted to make a game where when you die thats it... as in literally, you would need to buy a new copy of the game to play again. Would love to see how the internet would react to that one.
    Reminds me of this old Flash game which could only play once. Every action counted.

    http://www.joystiq.com/2010/12/07/one-chance-the-adventure-game-you-can-only-play-once/


    Currently playing Fire Emblem on bitch mode, too scared to let anyone die or deal with restarting. Finally gonna sit down with XCOM after, guess it's time to face the permadeath reaper.
  • psychokitten Moderator 4 Jun 2013 21:02:05 7,794 posts
    Seen 4 months ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Depends on the game. Wouldn't want it in everything, obviously. Works great in something like DayZ. Makes every decision count, makes it very tense.
  • Page

    of 2 First / Last

    Previous
Log in or register to reply