Introducing the secret seekers and their eight-year quest
"If there's anything in reality that's not fun, we will change it."
Loading...hold tight!
Page
of 2 First / Last
Ask me anything about Dungeon Keeper
mikew1985 wrote:All valid points but it's worth remembering that they spent time building tools and an engine for 3, most of that won't need to to be significantly altered for this. I hate to bring up GTA in a SR thread but it could be more like Vice City was to GTA 3.
Hmm less than a two year turn around?
Combine that with the fact that they were going to make that expansion for 3 but rolled it into the fourth game and I've a suspicion this is going to be a bit of a half sequel.
I'll reserve judgment but I'm concerned that the relatively quick turnaround and other circumstances with THQ etc. could lead to this sequel not being to the same standard as SR3.
Please don't use the delete button, think of the children.
.gif)
Please don't use the delete button, think of the children.
welshben23 wrote:You are thinking of "cackdown 2"
That looks too much like Cackdown to me, which I hated. I think I'll pass on this one.
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem! Oh, yeah!"
Mr-Brett wrote:Hmmm I don't know, if you add 1 - 2 months of disturbance with the whole THQ saga; we're looking at just over a year and a half of development time. I would be hugely suprised if its as much of a change as even the likes of VC and SA were.mikew1985 wrote:All valid points but it's worth remembering that they spent time building tools and an engine for 3, most of that won't need to to be significantly altered for this. I hate to bring up GTA in a SR thread but it could be more like Vice City was to GTA 3.
Hmm less than a two year turn around?
Combine that with the fact that they were going to make that expansion for 3 but rolled it into the fourth game and I've a suspicion this is going to be a bit of a half sequel.
I'll reserve judgment but I'm concerned that the relatively quick turnaround and other circumstances with THQ etc. could lead to this sequel not being to the same standard as SR3.
Please don't use the delete button, think of the children.
Notice: If you notice this notice you will notice that this notice is not worth noticing.
Follow me on Twitter: @MrTom
Voted by the community "Best mod" 2011 and 2012.
Mr-Brett wrote:A better comparison would be like going from Vice City to San Andreas. Vice City was essentially GTA 3: 80's expansion pack. Not exactly a big upgrade.mikew1985 wrote:All valid points but it's worth remembering that they spent time building tools and an engine for 3, most of that won't need to to be significantly altered for this. I hate to bring up GTA in a SR thread but it could be more like Vice City was to GTA 3.
Hmm less than a two year turn around?
Combine that with the fact that they were going to make that expansion for 3 but rolled it into the fourth game and I've a suspicion this is going to be a bit of a half sequel.
I'll reserve judgment but I'm concerned that the relatively quick turnaround and other circumstances with THQ etc. could lead to this sequel not being to the same standard as SR3.
Please don't use the delete button, think of the children.
Mr-Brett wrote:Oh I thought you meant that Vice City was a big upgrade my bad. I'm hoping they actually put alot of content in Saints row 4 as it looks exactly like Saints row 3. If not this could be the type of lazy cash in trying to get the last of current gen owner's cash before next gen arrives.
That was my point though, I don't expect this to be a big upgrade but like Vice City was to GTA3, it could still be a decent sequel anyway.
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem! Oh, yeah!"
Follow me on Twitter: @MrTom
Voted by the community "Best mod" 2011 and 2012.
Page
of 2 First / Last
