Swiss show the middle finger to greedy failures

  • Page

    of 3 First / Last

    Previous
  • Armoured_Bear 4 Mar 2013 14:38:40 14,451 posts
    Seen 58 minutes ago
    Registered 3 years ago
    Teh people Power

    Any chance of this happening elsewhere?
    Will it make a difference ? .
  • Bremenacht 4 Mar 2013 14:45:36 21,616 posts
    Seen 10 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Doing something similar with bankers' bonuses over here, and also claiming that steps will be taken to prevent them from bumping up their salaries to compensate (which they did before). But, outrage at this curb on raw talent is building, and it will probably come to nothing.
  • ZuluHero 4 Mar 2013 14:48:30 4,594 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I was more interested in this in the side-link bar of that article:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-21654930

    Just who is this caped crusader and where does he get those wonderful toys? :)

    Edited by ZuluHero at 14:55:21 04-03-2013
  • nickthegun 4 Mar 2013 14:54:15 63,909 posts
    Seen 26 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    To be fair to the general public, they see RBS announcing that they are losing billions and in the same breath announce that they paid nearly half a billion in bonuses last year.

    Its not a huge surprise that it does not compute.
  • Deleted user 4 March 2013 15:02:49
    LeoliansBro wrote:
    .
    Curse your .!
  • THFourteen 4 Mar 2013 15:05:29 36,668 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Its a tough one.

    In a normal investment bank, people who work in operations / technology etc might get 30-60k per year, and a 5-50% bonus if the company / team does well

    the people who work in the portfolio management roles might have a salary of (i guess) 50k-1m depending on seniority. But they will get huge bonuses during good times, and smaller bonuses during bad times, but still sizeable.

    if their salaries have to go up to compensate their bonuses being capped, all that extra money will come out of the "little guy" and people who actually do the grunt work will get the sack.
  • Psychotext 4 Mar 2013 15:16:30 57,323 posts
    Seen 41 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    As long as it's directly related to trading performance I really don't have any problem with bonuses. Pay them minimum wage and let them survive on how good or bad they are (assuming enough oversight to ensure they don't start bankrupting the banks they work for).
  • Big-Swiss 4 Mar 2013 15:17:08 8,531 posts
    Seen 6 days ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    I think this is great!

    you know, if some guys would have not totally overboarded, then this law would not have ben voted for.

    But we are talking some board dudes from pharma companies getting 72 Millions. 72 fucking millions for doing what? and medication is fucking expensive. That just doesen't sound right, there was something that had to be done!

    I'm very happy with the law!
  • Bremenacht 4 Mar 2013 15:17:47 21,616 posts
    Seen 10 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    It's not about those bankers who make a lot of money though, is it?

    It's about people in highly paid roles getting highly paid regardless of performance.

    The idiotic general public understands one thing very well: they can work as hard as they like and their salary generally remains the same. Hence, anger, resentment etc.
  • imamazed 4 Mar 2013 15:17:55 6,216 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    LeoliansBro wrote:
    Or put it like this. Would you rather a generic banker (say his deals and trades brought in 10m for the bank annually) got paid:

    a) 100k with up to a 400k bonus.

    b) 300k flat with no bonus.
    B.

    Because it would all be liable for income tax and so would provide more for society.

    Or are bonuses taxed more? I honestly don't know.
  • nickthegun 4 Mar 2013 15:19:06 63,909 posts
    Seen 26 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Shouldnt he also be rewarded in line with the organisation he is working for?
  • Armoured_Bear 4 Mar 2013 15:20:32 14,451 posts
    Seen 58 minutes ago
    Registered 3 years ago
    Psychotext wrote:
    As long as it's directly related to trading performance I really don't have any problem with bonuses. Pay them minimum wage and let them survive on how good or bad they are (assuming enough oversight to ensure they don't start bankrupting the banks they work for).
    It isn't, that's what caused the Swiss reaction.
  • Psychotext 4 Mar 2013 15:21:22 57,323 posts
    Seen 41 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Big-Swiss wrote:
    But we are talking some board dudes from pharma companies getting 72 Millions. 72 fucking millions for doing what? and medication is fucking expensive. That just doesen't sound right, there was something that had to be done!
    I'm going to come across as a tory right now... and I really am not, but...

    Have you any idea how dim you sound right now? Do you think that money came from no-where? Or are you working on the assumption that the companies are able to magic drugs into life from no-where, just so they can sell them for next to nothing?

    Something had to be done!

    72m (72m what btw? Dollars?) is obscene, but if the company is making enough profits to make that sort of payment to him then more power to them.
  • Bremenacht 4 Mar 2013 15:25:32 21,616 posts
    Seen 10 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Anyway.



    Yeeaahhhh
  • nickthegun 4 Mar 2013 15:30:18 63,909 posts
    Seen 26 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Regardless, I think its stupid. If a non-nationalised bank wants to pay out insane bonuses, let them. Its none of the governments business.

    Its just another case of pandering to the tabloids when there are, frankly, far more serious things that need looking at first.

    Its basically the 'gay marriage' of the financial world, constantly brought up so people dont pay closer attention to the real problems.
  • imamazed 4 Mar 2013 15:33:41 6,216 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:

    Its basically the 'gay marriage' of the financial world, constantly brought up so people dont pay closer attention to the real problems.
    Oh, wow. That's subjective.

    Personally I think inequality of earnings is a huge issue, and a very real and prevalent problem in today's society.

    Similarly, the blanket equality of marital union is an important sybolic milestone and can be sorted out.
  • nickthegun 4 Mar 2013 15:38:14 63,909 posts
    Seen 26 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Socialism is a separate issue. If we live in an, albeit moderate, capitalist society, they should be free to pay the bankers what they like.
  • Deleted user 4 March 2013 15:40:47
    Was just discussing that today, with a German economist.

    Can someone explain to my why we don't have a curved line when it comes to tax bands, rather than the jarring 'step' system where crossing a threshold puts you in the same tax bracket as someone earning thousands more than you?
  • imamazed 4 Mar 2013 15:41:48 6,216 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:
    Socialism is a separate issue. If we live in an, albeit moderate, capitalist society, they should be free to pay the bankers what they like.
    I understand why you say that, but socialism is irrelevant really. It's not a distraction; even in a capitalist country a lot of people are concerned about the growing inequality of earnings. Just because you don't see bonuses as a problem doesn't mean it isn't a problem for a lot of other people.
  • Deleted user 4 March 2013 15:43:52
    I'm in charge of a company that makes 20k profit a year and I get paid 50k

    I'm in charge of a company that makes 5bn profit a year. It's not that much harder so I should also get 50k.
  • Deleted user 4 March 2013 15:44:05
    LeoliansBro wrote:
    RedSparrows wrote:
    Was just discussing that today, with a German economist.

    Can someone explain to my why we don't have a curved line when it comes to tax bands, rather than the jarring 'step' system where crossing a threshold puts you in the same tax bracket as someone earning thousands more than you?
    Complexity.
    Complexity being a technical term, or what? Or you mean a curved line is overly complex? Blokey was saying that was the system in Germany.
  • Page

    of 3 First / Last

    Previous
Log in or register to reply