Thanks.
Oh, wow. Fucking hell.
Oh, wow. Fucking hell.
Legless Blade Runner shoots girlfriend in face • Page 8
-
Page
of 43 First / Last -
ZizouFC 5,332 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 4 years ago -
Trowel 15,132 posts
Seen 11 hours ago
Registered 10 years ago'Police sources say Steenkamp's skull was "crushed"' isn't the nicest headline... -
The-Bodybuilder 11,595 posts
Seen 22 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoSome of you are taking the pist.
Edited by The-Bodybuilder at 09:18:18 17-02-2013 -
Waffleaber 210 posts
Seen 59 minutes ago
Registered 9 years agoTrowel wrote:
See now that's why you need an agreed safe word.
SA press claim with that an initial shot was fired in the bedroom, and a blood covered cricket bat was retrieved... :/ -
mrpon 24,456 posts
Seen 4 minutes ago
Registered 7 years agoA Daily Mail commenter:
Scenario: Reeva goes for an early morning pee, just before Francois Hougaard sends her a Valentine text which wakes Pistorius - who reads it. In a fury he goes to the bathroom with his gun to confront Reeva.........
-
DaM 11,838 posts
Seen 13 minutes ago
Registered 11 years agomrpon wrote:
But why would he keep a cricket bat in the bog?
A Daily Mail commenter:
Scenario: Reeva goes for an early morning pee, just before Francois Hougaard sends her a Valentine text which wakes Pistorius - who reads it. In a fury he goes to the bathroom with his gun to confront Reeva.........
-
ZizouFC 5,332 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 4 years agoPolice reports state that she was wearing a nighty. So does that mean she was always home with him, or that she rocked up for a sexy Valentines day surprise? -
THFourteen 29,271 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoSo now apparently Pistorius was high on steroids before going into a roid rage with the cricket bat, and shooting her through the door when she ran in to hide.
Jebus -
FogHeart 721 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 6 years agoBlood spattered cricket bats, broken down doors, you gotta shoot 'em in the head...
How long before we hear the Z word? -
cubbymoore 35,648 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoHe'll almost definitely be stripped of his paralympic medals then. Don't see how they won't. Not that that's the worst thing about this, but the credibility of the paralympics regarding drugs was already in question. It'll be hard to redeem what it gained from the London games in the next few games if this turns out to be true, it's biggest star doping, let alone the murdering. -
Mola_Ram 2,781 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 12 months agoIs it wrong that I'm thinking of the South Park Paralympics episode now? -
Deckard1 19,214 posts
Seen 4 minutes ago
Registered 4 years agoHigh on steroids? -
Chopsen 13,800 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoSo using technologically advanced, specifically designed drugs to enhance your performance is bad, but using technologically advanced, specifically designed limbs is ok? How's that work?Thanks for expressing interest in my signature!
-
sport 10,979 posts
Seen 37 minutes ago
Registered 8 years agoFogHeart wrote:
He went all Zoidberg on her?
Blood spattered cricket bats, broken down doors, you gotta shoot 'em in the head...
How long before we hear the Z word? -
riceNpea 591 posts
Seen 1 minute ago
Registered 5 years agocunt doesn't start with Z -
Murbal 19,664 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 8 years ago -
mrpon 24,456 posts
Seen 4 minutes ago
Registered 7 years agoPerformance boosting steroids, so Viagra then? -
Lukus 18,757 posts
Seen 20 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoChopsen wrote:
One is against the rules, one isn't. So using the former gives an unfair advantage. It's about a level playing field. Which is stupid given the vastly different types of disabilities anyway. But that debate has already been done to death.
So using technologically advanced, specifically designed drugs to enhance your performance is bad, but using technologically advanced, specifically designed limbs is ok? How's that work?Paintings & Photographs
-
Chopsen 13,800 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoYeah, but why are the rules like that? If you're allowed to use cutting edge tech limb design, why are drugs automatically bad?Thanks for expressing interest in my signature!
-
glaeken 10,428 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 8 years agoPersonally I would like to see the drugged up Olympics anyway. It would be great to see what we could get out of a human with no barriers of any kind on what they can do.
Who would watch the normal Olympics if you could see some freakishly mutant pissing all over base line human performance. -
neilka 12,575 posts
Seen 25 minutes ago
Registered 8 years agomrpon wrote:
He wouldn't have needed the cricket bat.
Performance boosting steroids, so Viagra then?EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE FINE
-
ZizouFC 5,332 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 4 years agoBecause he needs artificial limbs to be able to run. -
Chopsen 13,800 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoNot really. He could run on his stumps.Thanks for expressing interest in my signature!
-
nickthegun 45,309 posts
Seen 1 hour ago
Registered 7 years agoThe limbs are tested and ratified as being within 'human like' specifications, in that they would give you no advantage over someone with legs.
The company that has made them has developed several generations on from the ones that have been approved to the point that he could have broken every able bodied record going, but hes 'stuck' with the old model for the sake of fairness.---------------------------------------------------------
AGP.SRPT -
Mola_Ram 2,781 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 12 months agoWell, there's one advantage in that they wouldn't get sore. -
THFourteen 29,271 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoglaeken wrote:
Dunno the WIlliams sisters made womens tennis quite dull at one stage.
Who would watch the normal Olympics if you could see some freakishly mutant pissing all over base line human performance.
OH YES I WENT THERE! -
riceNpea 591 posts
Seen 1 minute ago
Registered 5 years agoChopsen wrote:
technologically advanced limbs?
So using technologically advanced, specifically designed drugs to enhance your performance is bad, but using technologically advanced, specifically designed limbs is ok? How's that work?
i don't think i'm ready to swap my legs for those butter knives thanks.
Edited by riceNpea at 14:03:39 18-02-2013 -
Pac-man-ate-my-wife 6,988 posts
Seen 28 minutes ago
Registered 10 years ago@Chopsen it's just the way sport is. Technologically advanced equipment - whether for use by disabled athletes or non-disabled athletes (such as boats, bikes, tennis rackets, bows etc) - is okay. Drugs are bad, m'kay? -
Lukus 18,757 posts
Seen 20 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoChopsen wrote:
Something to do with purity I guess. Natural human ability.
Yeah, but why are the rules like that? If you're allowed to use cutting edge tech limb design, why are drugs automatically bad?Paintings & Photographs
-
Lukus wrote:
Drugs can also have long term side effects and fuck with your mind / body. See roid rage as an example.Chopsen wrote:
Something to do with purity I guess. Natural human ability.
Yeah, but why are the rules like that? If you're allowed to use cutting edge tech limb design, why are drugs automatically bad? -
Page
of 43 First / Last
