"I'll be back!" - Arnie returns in Terminator 5 Page 6

  • Page

    of 14 First / Last

  • Strikealight 30 Jun 2013 12:24:19 40 posts
    Seen 11 months ago
    Registered 3 years ago
    Arnie now has a dodgy ticker. Thats the thing with steroids, they tend to fuck you up.

    Its difficult to see how hes gonna be able train at the levels needed for him to pile the muscle back on.

    Edited by Strikealight at 12:25:27 30-06-2013
  • FWB 30 Jun 2013 12:27:27 44,530 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    C
    G
    I


    And body doubles.
  • Pierre2k 30 Jun 2013 12:33:31 113 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    On topic, for me the ordering goes:

    T2>T1>T3>T4

    I honestly didn't hate T3 as much as most people seem to. It was completely unnecessary, and do have some cheesy humour at times, but it had good action scenes, decent effects, and Kristana Loken was hot. She can't act, but when was that a prerequisite to play a Terminator?

    Terminator Savatuon had do much potential. A new trilogy, set in the future (we all loved the future "flashbacks" in the original movies) with a pretty decent cast. It was neutered by attempts to get is a 12 certificate and a lack of the large scale guerrilla warfare I wanted to see. It also didn't feel all that futuristic compared to the scenes in T1 and T2. A massively squandered opportunity.

    Better to say nothing and be considered a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt

  • Deleted user 30 June 2013 16:00:01
    Pierre2k wrote:
    Terminator Savatuon had do much potential. A new trilogy, set in the future (we all loved the future "flashbacks" in the original movies) with a pretty decent cast. It was neutered by attempts to get is a 12 certificate and a lack of the large scale guerrilla warfare I wanted to see. It also didn't feel all that futuristic compared to the scenes in T1 and T2. A massively squandered opportunity.
    Whilst it's understandable that people were annoyed that it didn't look like how it was depicted in the earlier movies, the thing everyone overlooks is that future scenes in T1/2 were set in 2029. Salvation is set in 2018.
  • Pierre2k 30 Jun 2013 16:55:40 113 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    @meme Fair comment. Still didn't like the film, but I accept that the flashbacks were set further in the future.

    As an aside, reading my post back, it's full of typos. Wrote it on my iPhone so please don't call the grammar police in me ;-)

    Better to say nothing and be considered a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt

  • Deleted user 14 July 2013 19:31:17
    Late to the party, is this new film not continuing the salvation line?
    I really liked salvation and would like that confined.

    Need to watch t2 again along with predator and aliens, 3 10/10 movies.
  • vijay_UK 10 Dec 2013 09:11:03 2,139 posts
    Seen 24 minutes ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Terminator 5 has a title, and it's Terminator: Genesis.
  • sega 10 Dec 2013 09:13:34 857 posts
    Seen 34 minutes ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    I had best be Terminator: Megadrive over here.
  • Steve_Perry 10 Dec 2013 09:13:50 4,136 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    They should really just lower this series into a pit of molten lava and let it die.

    VIVA STEFANSEN

  • Steve_Perry 10 Dec 2013 09:15:12 4,136 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    What happened to Gremmi?

    VIVA STEFANSEN

  • Gemeo 10 Dec 2013 09:15:28 241 posts
    Seen 14 hours ago
    Registered 1 year ago
    [arnold voice] Ia'm Anciant Bebee
  • neilka 10 Dec 2013 09:19:14 15,907 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Steve_Perry wrote:
    What happened to Gremmi?
    Gremmi's fine, honey. Gremmi's just fine.

    A map is like comparing velocity and speed.

  • CharlieStCloud 10 Dec 2013 09:30:00 5,202 posts
    Seen 1 month ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    Maybe it was because I had low expectations going into Terminator 3, but I didn't think it was that bad!

    ... the scene with the fire engine (?) whereby Arnie was hanging off the swinging ladder was just as good as some of the big action sequences in Terminator 2. The ending was abrupt and the female Terminator - whilst easy on the eye - was not overly threatening, especially compared to the blank faced, emotionless and menacing Robert Patrick.

    Be interesting to see where the series goes from here onwards however, just like I did with the third outing, it would be wise to keep your expectations low.
  • MadCaddy13 10 Dec 2013 09:31:19 1,917 posts
    Seen 5 seconds ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    sega wrote:
    I had best be Terminator: Megadrive over here.
    Only you could say that! Very apt
  • Steve_Perry 10 Dec 2013 09:33:04 4,136 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    T3 takes the worst part of T2 and makes a film from it, namely trying to make the Terminator funny. "I need a vacation" from T2 is the worst line in the movie. I guess it's why I've always thought the first is the best one, no funnies.

    VIVA STEFANSEN

  • mcmonkeyplc 10 Dec 2013 09:35:20 39,456 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    T2 RULES!

    Come and get it cumslingers!

  • vijay_UK 10 Dec 2013 09:47:42 2,139 posts
    Seen 24 minutes ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    mcmonkeyplc wrote:
    T2 RULES!
    Still the best cinema experience for me, from way back when. There are better films, but T2 was just magic.
  • glaeken 10 Dec 2013 09:54:11 11,170 posts
    Seen 26 seconds ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    @Steve_Perry I would guess you are glad this scene was cut then.

    Comedy

    It really plays totally for comedy and feels completely out of place in a Terminator film. It kind of gives you an insight into the makers of the film and where they were coming from.

    I actually still quite like T3 though. It has some great actions scenes and from the point Skynet takes over it actually changes tone completely and the actual ending is great.

    Edited by glaeken at 09:55:31 10-12-2013
  • Steve_Perry 10 Dec 2013 09:56:38 4,136 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    Yeah I have seen that before. Terrible.

    T3 is decent. Not a patch on the first two but at least its a Terminator film in spirit unlike Salvation, which is a dogs dinner.

    Edited by Steve_Perry at 09:57:20 10-12-2013

    VIVA STEFANSEN

  • Gemeo 10 Dec 2013 09:59:49 241 posts
    Seen 14 hours ago
    Registered 1 year ago
  • baconchin 10 Dec 2013 10:11:51 44 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 1 year ago
    Pierre2k wrote:
    Terminator Savatuon had do much potential. A new trilogy, set in the future (we all loved the future "flashbacks" in the original movies) with a pretty decent cast. It was neutered by attempts to get is a 12 certificate and a lack of the large scale guerrilla warfare I wanted to see. It also didn't feel all that futuristic compared to the scenes in T1 and T2. A massively squandered opportunity.
    With this new film, have the writers decided to just ignore Salvation?
  • beastmaster 10 Dec 2013 10:36:33 11,408 posts
    Seen 16 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    There's been all kind of stories going around. This time it'll feature a teen Sarah Connor apparently. Make of that what you will.

    What timeline this will set in is anyone's guess.

    The Resident Evil films. I'm one of the reasons they keep making them.

  • imamazed 10 Dec 2013 10:39:36 5,569 posts
    Seen 34 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    WILL EDWARD FURLONG BE BACK PLZ
  • Latin 10 Dec 2013 10:41:34 3,659 posts
    Seen 35 seconds ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    T2 was on the other day... Still amazing. T 1000 is a complete bastard!
  • ChocNut 10 Dec 2013 10:53:16 2,184 posts
    Seen 8 months ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    They should do avatar-esque cgi Arnie. He can then just do voiceover and facial reference material.

    It's the only way.
  • Steve_Perry 10 Dec 2013 11:01:20 4,136 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    beastmaster wrote:
    There's been all kind of stories going around. This time it'll feature a teen Sarah Connor apparently. Make of that what you will.

    What timeline this will set in is anyone's guess.
    I think they should fuck the Connors off now and focus on someone else. I can't see how they can do anything with the Connor story given how convoluted the timeline now is. Unless they do a Star Trek and wipe the slate clean, which is just a massive writers cop-out.

    VIVA STEFANSEN

  • mrpon 10 Dec 2013 11:18:22 28,893 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    imamazed wrote:
    WILL EDWARD FURLONG BE BACK PLZ
    He looks.........fucked.

    Give yourself 5 or gig, you're worth it.

  • nickthegun 10 Dec 2013 11:20:18 59,857 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I still wonder whether The Crow movie I saw with him as The Crow was all just a dream.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    someone say something funny

  • Load_2.0 10 Dec 2013 11:23:24 19,248 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Eddie Furlong will be the father of Teen Sarah Connor. Kyle Reese is the drunk uncle and T1000 is Santa.

    Think Home Alone meets Letters from Iwo Jima with robots and you are halfway there.
  • kalel 10 Dec 2013 11:24:53 87,571 posts
    Seen 25 minutes ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    IMHO the only way forward for this franchise now is a reboot.
  • Page

    of 14 First / Last

Log in or register to reply