The debate that really matters Page 2

  • Page

    of 2 First / Last

    Next
  • Deleted user 11 October 2012 09:49:22
    Countdown is awful since they got that Nick guy to present it. How could they have thought that was a good idea? No charisma or ability to present whatsoever.

    Also as fit as Rachel is, it's a bit embarrassing how blatant it is that she's getting the answers to the maths questions fed to her. They've basically given a page 3 girl an ear piece. Vorderman actually had the brains.
  • nickthegun 11 Oct 2012 09:51:03 61,118 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Stelling gave it a good crack

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    My man gives real loving that's why I call him Killer
    He's not a wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am, he's a thriller

  • Deleted user 11 October 2012 09:52:51
    Yeah, Stelling was the best since poor old Dickie. You need someone with a very quick wit to present Countdown. THey should get Clive Anderson to do it. Whatever happened to him?
  • heyyo 11 Oct 2012 10:36:11 14,371 posts
    Seen 13 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    LeoliansBro wrote:
    Anyone who is around to watch either of these is at home at 5pm, and so obviously is unemployed, and so therefore poor. I don't talk to poor people.


    Edited by heyyo at 10:36:26 11-10-2012
  • Wacko_AK 11 Oct 2012 10:36:18 206 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    They should get Clive Anderson to do it. Whatever happened to him?
    He's still about, mainly on Radio4 for a legal program I think.

    He would be a good choice.
  • heyyo 11 Oct 2012 10:43:18 14,371 posts
    Seen 13 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Facepalm wrote:
    kalel wrote:
    They've basically given a page 3 girl an ear piece. Vorderman actually had the brains.
    Rachel has honours in mathematics from Oxford, but whatever.
    Because they teach you mental arithmetic on a maths degree, not in school right?
  • kinky_mong 11 Oct 2012 11:03:44 10,750 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Pointless is the better of the two, but I'm never home to see them during the week, so I've only seen the celebrity versions.

    This outtake from the chaser is good stuff though...

    All the eurogamers who actually play with each other on xbl rather than just post pseudointellectual pc handwringing bollocks on the forums, love the shit out of biggy.

  • Murbs 11 Oct 2012 11:05:30 22,527 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    heyyo wrote:
    Facepalm wrote:
    kalel wrote:
    They've basically given a page 3 girl an ear piece. Vorderman actually had the brains.
    Rachel has honours in mathematics from Oxford, but whatever.
    Because they teach you mental arithmetic on a maths degree, not in school right?
    She also reviews 'games' for the Fail http://bit.ly/W5yTBv
  • johnson81 11 Oct 2012 12:41:58 389 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    When I manage to get home in time, Pointless all the way. But I think both shows are rigged to some degree. The amount of 1 pointers in Pointless is ridiculous and I'm sure the Chasers have an ear piece.
  • mcmonkeyplc 11 Oct 2012 12:50:02 39,521 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    LeoliansBro wrote:
    Anyone who is around to watch either of these is at home at 5pm, and so obviously is unemployed, and so therefore poor. I don't talk to poor people.
    Of course you talk to poor people. How else do you communicate with your butler?

    Come and get it cumslingers!

  • Page

    of 2 First / Last

    Next
Log in or register to reply