Booth Babes and the Expo Page 23

  • Page

    of 31 First / Last

  • warlockuk 22 Oct 2012 13:35:59 19,287 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Ah, right. My apologies, in that case. When it was showing 2.6k rather than 51k I was presuming he was showing us a 1" e-peen rather than 1'
  • MrTomFTW Moderator 11 Jan 2013 07:01:53 42,414 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    Meanwhile, at CES (NSFW)

    God knows what they were there to "promote".
  • THFourteen 11 Jan 2013 07:05:11 37,028 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Nice!

    Er I mean outrageous. I'm totally outraged.
  • jonsaan 11 Jan 2013 07:42:55 25,912 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Beautiful. I for one applaud the female form in all its glory. That's a lot more tasteful than hooters style booth candy.
  • MrTomFTW Moderator 11 Jan 2013 07:55:46 42,414 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    jonsaan wrote:
    Beautiful. I for one applaud the female form in all its glory. That's a lot more tasteful than hooters style booth candy.
    Topless women, who are not allowed to talk or move and are referred to as "bots" are *more* tasteful? Are you sure about that?
  • THFourteen 11 Jan 2013 07:56:15 37,028 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    You just don't understand ART.

    Edited by THFourteen at 07:56:24 11-01-2013
  • MrTomFTW Moderator 11 Jan 2013 07:58:52 42,414 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    If it was art, I wouldn't be bothered. But they're there as eye candy to sell something. It's just plain creepy.
  • jonsaan 11 Jan 2013 07:59:20 25,912 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I said 'more' tasteful. I didn't say they 'were'tasteful.:)

    Next on the scale is 'not very' tasteful
  • Dangerous_Dan 11 Jan 2013 08:00:17 2,390 posts
    Seen 2 months ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    But as mentioned it's sexless thus it's not pornographic thus it is art thus it is morally good, right? Right???!
  • jonsaan 11 Jan 2013 08:02:28 25,912 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    That reminds me of the Daily Mail's current hate campaign against Angelica Houston. Queue much hand wringing when she attempts to kill herself..

    Not the stripy woman.
  • MrTomFTW Moderator 11 Jan 2013 08:25:25 42,414 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    Dangerous_Dan wrote:
    But as mentioned it's sexless thus it's not pornographic thus it is art thus it is morally good, right? Right???!
    Well no, because it's still a shameless attempt at advertising.
  • Dangerous_Dan 11 Jan 2013 08:40:50 2,390 posts
    Seen 2 months ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    @MrTomFTW Why is it shameless? It looks sexless. What kind of shame are you talking about? The shame that their advertising is probably not very good because people don't even recognize what it's about, that they are bad at their job?
  • Dangerous_Dan 11 Jan 2013 08:48:02 2,390 posts
    Seen 2 months ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Well, shouldn't that kind of shame being felt everywhere in advertising?
    "If you buy this car, the girls gonna fall for you."
    "Mommy, if you prepare that kind of instant meal your family's going to love you."
    "If you open an account in our bank, you'll feel like a real successful person."

    That is manipulating the customers emotions.
  • brokenkey 11 Jan 2013 09:14:48 7,473 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    It mentions Instagram in the background. Can we blame facebook for this outrage.
  • kinky_mong 11 Jan 2013 10:18:34 11,624 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    MrTomFTW wrote:

    Topless women, who are not allowed to talk or move
    Sounds like the "What are you looking for?" section on my dating profile.
  • morriss 11 Jan 2013 10:25:49 71,284 posts
    Seen 2 months ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    They could have turned the job down, innit.
  • beastmaster 11 Jan 2013 10:34:03 13,124 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Booth babes not acceptable? What about race day girls at motorsports events?
  • Mr-Brett 11 Jan 2013 11:14:46 13,261 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    morriss wrote:
    They could have turned the job down, innit.
    That's hard to say without knowing their financial situations.

    Also I first read that as "They could have jumped up and down, innit."
  • THFourteen 11 Jan 2013 11:15:35 37,028 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    has anyone managed to wank over this picture yet?

    if not, its probably not p0rn.
  • waggy79 11 Jan 2013 11:17:03 1,281 posts
    Seen 18 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    No one is pointing a gun at these girls heads. Its no different to page 3 or any 'glamour' modelling. They're getting well paid for very little 'work' in most cases. Don't see the big deal personally.
  • nickthegun 11 Jan 2013 11:18:23 64,323 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    What it doesnt show is the next stand is four guys with brightly painted wangs.
  • Lukus 11 Jan 2013 11:20:42 19,710 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    They're not allowed to move you say?

    /primes cock
  • Mr-Brett 11 Jan 2013 11:22:34 13,261 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    waggy79 wrote:
    No one is pointing a gun at these girls heads. Its no different to page 3 or any 'glamour' modelling. They're getting well paid for very little 'work' in most cases. Don't see the big deal personally.
    Again that seems to be an assumption, I'm not saying it's wrong but how do you know?
  • THFourteen 11 Jan 2013 11:28:14 37,028 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    you're assuming he's assuming you're assuming. Are you 100% certain?
  • Page

    of 31 First / Last

Log in or register to reply