Booth Babes and the Expo Page 23

  • Page

    of 30 First / Last

  • warlockuk 22 Oct 2012 13:35:59 19,131 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Ah, right. My apologies, in that case. When it was showing 2.6k rather than 51k I was presuming he was showing us a 1" e-peen rather than 1'

    I'm a grumpy bastard.

  • MrTomFTW Moderator 11 Jan 2013 07:01:53 37,299 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Meanwhile, at CES (NSFW)

    God knows what they were there to "promote".

    Follow me on Twitter: @MrTom
    Voted by the community "Best mod" 2011, 2012 and 2013.

  • THFourteen 11 Jan 2013 07:05:11 32,853 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Nice!

    Er I mean outrageous. I'm totally outraged.
  • LeoliansBro 11 Jan 2013 07:07:52 43,132 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Heh, oddly sexless as well.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • jonsaan 11 Jan 2013 07:42:55 25,326 posts
    Seen 21 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Beautiful. I for one applaud the female form in all its glory. That's a lot more tasteful than hooters style booth candy.

    FCUTA!

  • MrTomFTW Moderator 11 Jan 2013 07:55:46 37,299 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    jonsaan wrote:
    Beautiful. I for one applaud the female form in all its glory. That's a lot more tasteful than hooters style booth candy.
    Topless women, who are not allowed to talk or move and are referred to as "bots" are *more* tasteful? Are you sure about that?

    Follow me on Twitter: @MrTom
    Voted by the community "Best mod" 2011, 2012 and 2013.

  • THFourteen 11 Jan 2013 07:56:15 32,853 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    You just don't understand ART.

    Edited by THFourteen at 07:56:24 11-01-2013
  • LeoliansBro 11 Jan 2013 07:57:28 43,132 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    It looks like it wants to be art, in a sort of Andy Warhol way.

    By which I mean shit.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • MrTomFTW Moderator 11 Jan 2013 07:58:52 37,299 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    If it was art, I wouldn't be bothered. But they're there as eye candy to sell something. It's just plain creepy.

    Follow me on Twitter: @MrTom
    Voted by the community "Best mod" 2011, 2012 and 2013.

  • jonsaan 11 Jan 2013 07:59:20 25,326 posts
    Seen 21 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    I said 'more' tasteful. I didn't say they 'were'tasteful.:)

    Next on the scale is 'not very' tasteful

    FCUTA!

  • Dangerous_Dan 11 Jan 2013 08:00:17 2,378 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    But as mentioned it's sexless thus it's not pornographic thus it is art thus it is morally good, right? Right???!
  • Deckard1 11 Jan 2013 08:00:54 27,044 posts
    Seen 14 minutes ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    The red and blue one could do with losing a few pound.





    What?
  • jonsaan 11 Jan 2013 08:02:28 25,326 posts
    Seen 21 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    That reminds me of the Daily Mail's current hate campaign against Angelica Houston. Queue much hand wringing when she attempts to kill herself..

    Not the stripy woman.

    FCUTA!

  • MrTomFTW Moderator 11 Jan 2013 08:25:25 37,299 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Dangerous_Dan wrote:
    But as mentioned it's sexless thus it's not pornographic thus it is art thus it is morally good, right? Right???!
    Well no, because it's still a shameless attempt at advertising.

    Follow me on Twitter: @MrTom
    Voted by the community "Best mod" 2011, 2012 and 2013.

  • Dangerous_Dan 11 Jan 2013 08:40:50 2,378 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    @MrTomFTW Why is it shameless? It looks sexless. What kind of shame are you talking about? The shame that their advertising is probably not very good because people don't even recognize what it's about, that they are bad at their job?
  • LeoliansBro 11 Jan 2013 08:42:32 43,132 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    The shame that they've assumed bewbs will attract their core demographic an hopefully help them to sell hard drives.

    And the depressing fact that they're probably right.

    Edited by LeoliansBro at 08:42:40 11-01-2013

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • Dangerous_Dan 11 Jan 2013 08:48:02 2,378 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    Well, shouldn't that kind of shame being felt everywhere in advertising?
    "If you buy this car, the girls gonna fall for you."
    "Mommy, if you prepare that kind of instant meal your family's going to love you."
    "If you open an account in our bank, you'll feel like a real successful person."

    That is manipulating the customers emotions.
  • brokenkey 11 Jan 2013 09:14:48 6,939 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    It mentions Instagram in the background. Can we blame facebook for this outrage.

    3DS 3497-0122-1484
    XBL/PSN/NNID: CptnBrokenkey

  • kinky_mong 11 Jan 2013 10:18:34 9,941 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    MrTomFTW wrote:

    Topless women, who are not allowed to talk or move
    Sounds like the "What are you looking for?" section on my dating profile.

    I'll never get my Orc looking the same again.

  • morriss 11 Jan 2013 10:25:49 70,911 posts
    Seen 21 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    They could have turned the job down, innit.
  • beastmaster 11 Jan 2013 10:34:03 11,139 posts
    Seen 39 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Booth babes not acceptable? What about race day girls at motorsports events?

    The Resident Evil films. I'm one of the reasons they keep making them.

  • Mr-Brett 11 Jan 2013 11:14:46 12,723 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    morriss wrote:
    They could have turned the job down, innit.
    That's hard to say without knowing their financial situations.

    Also I first read that as "They could have jumped up and down, innit."

    Portable view - Never forget.

  • THFourteen 11 Jan 2013 11:15:35 32,853 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    has anyone managed to wank over this picture yet?

    if not, its probably not p0rn.
  • waggy79 11 Jan 2013 11:17:03 912 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    No one is pointing a gun at these girls heads. Its no different to page 3 or any 'glamour' modelling. They're getting well paid for very little 'work' in most cases. Don't see the big deal personally.
  • nickthegun 11 Jan 2013 11:18:23 58,782 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    What it doesnt show is the next stand is four guys with brightly painted wangs.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    He totally called it

  • Lukus 11 Jan 2013 11:20:42 18,996 posts
    Seen 55 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    They're not allowed to move you say?

    /primes cock

    Paintings & Photographs

  • Mr-Brett 11 Jan 2013 11:22:34 12,723 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    waggy79 wrote:
    No one is pointing a gun at these girls heads. Its no different to page 3 or any 'glamour' modelling. They're getting well paid for very little 'work' in most cases. Don't see the big deal personally.
    Again that seems to be an assumption, I'm not saying it's wrong but how do you know?

    Portable view - Never forget.

  • LeoliansBro 11 Jan 2013 11:26:52 43,132 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    You're assuming they're being unfairly exploited. How do you know?

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • THFourteen 11 Jan 2013 11:28:14 32,853 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    you're assuming he's assuming you're assuming. Are you 100% certain?
  • LeoliansBro 11 Jan 2013 11:28:30 43,132 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Yes.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • Page

    of 30 First / Last

Log in or register to reply