TheSaint wrote:That's why they all use Canesten.
You have to feel sorry for the girls really, that's a pretty demeaning way to have to earn a crust.
NNID Sid-Nice
Introducing the secret seekers and their eight-year quest
"If there's anything in reality that's not fun, we will change it."
Loading...hold tight!
Page
of 29 First / LastTheSaint wrote:That's why they all use Canesten.
You have to feel sorry for the girls really, that's a pretty demeaning way to have to earn a crust.
NNID Sid-Nice
Come and get it cumslingers!
mowgli wrote:
Where are they dictating what women can wear? It is a pretty clear policy, and one that should be applauded.
At this year’s show three companies showed up with booth babes. Two in particular we thought were dressed inappropriately. As a short term measure we told them to move into the 18+ zone, and we asked some of them to put on leggings as well.That seems a bit over the top to me, covering up excessive cleavage I can understand but legs?!
You dare to strike Scurrcules!?
On Twitter: @HiddenAway1
CeaslessDischarge wrote:Well, at least you have some personal insight into your post.
Truly pathetic behaviour
Cosplayer wrote:Quite.
I feel embarrassed, ashamed and ficticious.
I'm a grumpy bastard.
-- boobs do nothing for me, I want moustaches and chest hair.
mcmonkeyplc wrote:"Filled" is a massive over-exaggeration. There were a few ranging from hot cosplayers dressed as Juliet from Lollipop Chainsaw, to "Dear god! Who's stopping the Billy Goats Gruff crossing the bridge if you're here?!"
The expo is filled with normal girls?! Where do I sign up for next year?!
I'm a grumpy bastard.
---------------------------------------------------------
AGP.SRPT
kinky_mong wrote:They were wearing incredibly small hotpants. Trust me.
That seems a bit over the top to me, covering up excessive cleavage I can understand but legs?!
And to bang a tired old drum, it's amusing that there's an issue over booth babes sexing up the place but not of showing off games involving dismemberment, murder, "torture-porn", and other acts of extreme violence, not all of them restricted to an 18+ area.It's a games expo and those were the games.
NNID Sid-Nice
MetalDog wrote:I presume you were outraged at Sex and the City's original C4 run being 'sponsored by Baileys' as well
@LeoliansBro I am thinking about demographics. When you're sending a message to such a large chunk of the population that 'this isn't for you' for no good reason, I don't think that's sensible.
Unless the game is something like Leisure Suit Larry, it just doesn't make any sense to put off potential buyers with irrelevant T&A. There is a reasonable chunk of womanhood who likes to shoot things, drive things and fly things and there will probably be even more of them in the future as games gain a better reputation.
Honestly, we can't get away from the 'teenage boy in bedroom' image for gaming fast enough imo.
I'm personally outraged that people shove vile smily sweet chocogak in my face and assume I'm that kind of limp fashion wanker just because I occasionally like to see four elderly harridans dropping their overused clungebuckets like circus tents onto every Manhatten cock they can find. LB, you really are a massive geek.
Sid-Nice wrote:See? This is how it starts
I think Eurogamer should ban all cosplay attendees; cosplay is for attention seekers and for every hot cosplayer there are at least 20 ugly enough to put you off your lunch.
Officially feel awkward now. LB, you really are a massive geek.
Cosplayer wrote:Don't take any notice of me; I'm just an idiot and sock detector.Sid-Nice wrote:See? This is how it starts
I think Eurogamer should ban all cosplay attendees; cosplay is for attention seekers and for every hot cosplayer there are at least 20 ugly enough to put you off your lunch.Officially feel awkward now.
NNID Sid-Nice
LeoliansBro wrote:If one good thing has come from this debacle of a thread, its this post!MetalDog wrote:I presume you were outraged at Sex and the City's original C4 run being 'sponsored by Baileys' as well
@LeoliansBro I am thinking about demographics. When you're sending a message to such a large chunk of the population that 'this isn't for you' for no good reason, I don't think that's sensible.
Unless the game is something like Leisure Suit Larry, it just doesn't make any sense to put off potential buyers with irrelevant T&A. There is a reasonable chunk of womanhood who likes to shoot things, drive things and fly things and there will probably be even more of them in the future as games gain a better reputation.
Honestly, we can't get away from the 'teenage boy in bedroom' image for gaming fast enough imo.I'm personally outraged that people shove vile smily sweet chocogak in my face and assume I'm that kind of limp fashion wanker just because I occasionally like to see four elderly harridans dropping their overused clungebuckets like circus tents onto every Manhatten cock they can find.
Page
of 29 First / Last