Paedogeddon - Jimmy Savile and other celebs Page 98

  • Page

    of 121 First / Last

  • nickthegun 2 Feb 2014 23:47:03 58,807 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I don't think this turn of events had shocked anyone.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    He totally called it

  • Mola_Ram 3 Feb 2014 00:11:52 6,983 posts
    Seen 9 minutes ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    Yeah, the Woody Allen thing isn't exactly news to me.
  • neilka 3 Feb 2014 01:57:19 15,665 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Have you had a go on his train set too?
  • Mola_Ram 3 Feb 2014 09:28:35 6,983 posts
    Seen 9 minutes ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    Let's just say that the purple rose of Cairo wasn't what you thought it was.
  • Deckard1 3 Feb 2014 09:41:46 27,197 posts
    Seen 2 minutes ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Its strange that its got to the point were no one really bats an eyelid at this stuff anymore.

    We've just had a detailed and heartbreaking account of a child being raped by Woody Allen, and everyone just shrugs. "Did he put his dick in a baby? Cos thats what we're up to now. Call me when someone else puts their dick in a baby again. In fact make it two babies"
  • TheMayorOfJugs 3 Feb 2014 09:44:01 3,069 posts
    Seen 31 minutes ago
    Registered 1 year ago
    Woody Allen is a fan of A Serbian Film then I take it?
  • kalel 3 Feb 2014 09:47:08 86,392 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Personally I don't really know how to react to the Woody Allen stuff. It's very easy to believe the accusations are true based on things like his marriage to Soon-Yi Previn and his whole "the heart wants what it wants" shtick.

    At the same time being with a 21 year old, or even a 17 year old (a la Manhattan) isn't raping a seven year old. No to mention this accusation has already gone through the courts and he was not found guilty.
  • nickthegun 3 Feb 2014 09:48:27 58,807 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I dont think anyones batted an eyelid at the Woody Allen revelations because... well... its woody allen, a well established and legitimised nonce.



    Edited by nickthegun at 09:48:51 03-02-2014

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    He totally called it

  • CosmicFuzz 3 Feb 2014 09:49:30 23,246 posts
    Seen 38 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Deckard1 wrote:
    Its strange that its got to the point were no one really bats an eyelid at this stuff anymore.

    We've just had a detailed and heartbreaking account of a child being raped by Woody Allen, and everyone just shrugs. "Did he put his dick in a baby? Cos thats what we're up to now. Call me when someone else puts their dick in a baby again. In fact make it two babies"
    I think it's more about Allen's relationship with Mia Farrow's kid that takes some of the wind out of the allegations' sails.

    Looking for a new gaming podcast to listen to? LOOK NO FURTHER!

  • CosmicFuzz 3 Feb 2014 09:51:56 23,246 posts
    Seen 38 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    kalel wrote:
    Personally I don't really know how to react to the Woody Allen stuff. It's very easy to believe the accusations are true based on things like his marriage to Soon-Yi Previn and his whole "the heart wants what it wants" shtick.

    At the same time being with a 21 year old, or even a 17 year old (a la Manhattan) isn't raping a seven year old. No to mention this accusation has already gone through the courts and he was not found guilty.
    Yeah, the fact that it's already been through the courts and dropped is important. Pretty good timing with the Oscars approaching for this to resurface if someone wanted to hit his weak spot for massive damage.

    Looking for a new gaming podcast to listen to? LOOK NO FURTHER!

  • CosmicFuzz 3 Feb 2014 09:53:36 23,246 posts
    Seen 38 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    In fact, could Allen not sue Dylan Farrow now for defamation? If the allegations have been proven to be false?

    Looking for a new gaming podcast to listen to? LOOK NO FURTHER!

  • nickthegun 3 Feb 2014 09:55:19 58,807 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Its a bit of a double edged sword.

    If he does nothing, he almost endorses it.

    If he takes it to court, every sordid detail of Allens life is writ large for the world to see, guilty or not (see: Kevin off Corrie. Not guilty but utterly humiliated).

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    He totally called it

  • CosmicFuzz 3 Feb 2014 09:57:38 23,246 posts
    Seen 38 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Yeah I see what you're saying. Oh dear.

    Looking for a new gaming podcast to listen to? LOOK NO FURTHER!

  • kalel 3 Feb 2014 10:03:10 86,392 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    It's also all quite difficult because the girl in question is in the nicest possible way, a total fruitcake - the courts found that she was unable to distinguish between fantasy and reality and the case fell apart because of it.

    So suing her would't be a great PR move.

    It's incredibly sad. She's not well, and maybe she was raped, but it's the bitterness Mia Farrow has towards Allen over the Previn thing that is likely to be driving the accusations.

    The whole thing is a total clusterfuck, but again, the Previn thing makes accusing Allen of being a fully fledged nonce eminently believable. It's an easy sell. That doesn't make it true (although at the same time, it might be true...).
  • CosmicFuzz 3 Feb 2014 10:07:17 23,246 posts
    Seen 38 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    What about the New York Times then; should they have published the letter? Great publicity sure, but if someone's been found not guilty of something, should they really be stirring up the pot? I'd imagine they couldn't be sued because it's not their own writing, but still, they chose to publish it.

    Looking for a new gaming podcast to listen to? LOOK NO FURTHER!

  • Deckard1 3 Feb 2014 10:09:42 27,197 posts
    Seen 2 minutes ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Don't really now much about the history of it to be honest, but is she definitely a fruitcake and not "the most expensive lawyers in the world made her look like a fruitcake"
  • Youthist 3 Feb 2014 10:09:58 10,010 posts
    Seen 21 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:
    Its a bit of a double edged sword.

    If he does nothing, he almost endorses it.

    If he takes it to court, every sordid detail of Allens life is writ large for the world to see, guilty or not (see: Kevin off Corrie. Not guilty but utterly humiliated).
    Yeah - 'allegedly' there is a lot more to the Kevin story than was revealed however, so let's not feel too sorry for him. Allegedly.

    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realise half of them are stupider than that

  • nickthegun 3 Feb 2014 10:13:36 58,807 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I dont feel sorry for him. Maybe a better, non-noncey analogy would be nigella.

    She took those two italians to court and had all her dirty laundry aired to try and establish her as an unreliable druggy.

    You can bet that if it went to court, every sordid part of allen and farrows split would be pawed over in forensic detail (for better of worse).

    Ugh, like the revelations that michael jackson used to show kids pictures of diseased cocks.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    He totally called it

  • kalel 3 Feb 2014 10:16:38 86,392 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Deckard1 wrote:
    Don't really now much about the history of it to be honest, but is she definitely a fruitcake and not "the most expensive lawyers in the world made her look like a fruitcake"
    It was the police doctor appointed by the court that concluded the story was invented, and likely made up by Mia Farrow.
  • sport 3 Feb 2014 10:18:18 12,561 posts
    Seen 10 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Hold on, did kalel just say he's with a 17 year old?!?
  • nickthegun 3 Feb 2014 10:19:25 58,807 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    There really are no winners in this scenario.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    He totally called it

  • sport 3 Feb 2014 10:21:51 12,561 posts
    Seen 10 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:
    There really are no winners in this scenario.
    The only way to win, is not to play.
  • CosmicFuzz 3 Feb 2014 10:29:10 23,246 posts
    Seen 38 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    sport wrote:
    nickthegun wrote:
    There really are no winners in this scenario.
    The only way to win, is not to play.
    Whoever wins... we lose.

    Looking for a new gaming podcast to listen to? LOOK NO FURTHER!

  • binster 3 Feb 2014 14:52:59 509 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Never thought I'd read this :

    "The Chuckle Brothers have arrived at Southwark Crown Court to give evidence in the DLT trial."
  • neilka 3 Feb 2014 14:57:23 15,665 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    "Mr. Chuckle, I put it to you..."
    "To me?"
    "To you."
    etc.
  • Dougs 3 Feb 2014 15:04:18 66,709 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    :D
  • binster 3 Feb 2014 15:17:41 509 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Not far off...

    "Younger Chuckle Brother Paul reprimanded for speaking in the first-person plural."

    I'm surprised they didn't walk in carrying a plank.
  • neilka 3 Feb 2014 15:20:33 15,665 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I thought they were both called Barry?
  • Steve_Perry 3 Feb 2014 15:28:29 3,584 posts
    Seen 8 hours ago
    Registered 2 years ago
    Racist.

    VIVA STEFANSEN

  • CosmicFuzz 3 Feb 2014 15:40:20 23,246 posts
    Seen 38 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Oh dear, oh dear.

    Looking for a new gaming podcast to listen to? LOOK NO FURTHER!

  • Page

    of 121 First / Last

Log in or register to reply