Celebrity Paedogeddon (now feat. other celeb sex offences) Page 83

  • Page

    of 131 First / Last

  • Lukus 29 Aug 2013 14:59:37 19,487 posts
    Seen 56 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    You just hear about it more. Cos it's sexy.

    Paintings & Photographs

  • DaM 29 Aug 2013 15:35:22 13,538 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    Deckard1 wrote:
    localnotail wrote:
    @Deckard1 It was predominantly a family thing though (still is). But there seems to have been a rise in the predatory un-related offender in the last half of the 20th century.
    A rise in the predatory un-related offender being reported.
    Maybe they would have just had a good doing, and warned to stay away from kids/run out of town?

    My dad also thinks he worked next to Robert Black, notorious Scottish child murderer in the same town, when working for the Parks Dept as a student.
  • Kafeen 29 Aug 2013 23:08:14 555 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    AceGrace wrote:
    Are none of our childhood heroes safe?

    Next it will be sooty!
    No, Sooty is a victim in all of this. He ways had Matthew Corbett's hand up his arse.
  • Youthist 29 Aug 2013 23:26:45 10,083 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    localnotail wrote:
    @Deckard1 It was predominantly a family thing though (still is). But there seems to have been a rise in the predatory un-related offender in the last half of the 20th century.
    Is this based on any facts or evidence? Other than you just sort of coming up with it, like.

    "Good chess players think one move ahead. Great chess players think two or three moves ahead."

  • X201 29 Aug 2013 23:46:21 15,755 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I remember seeing the stats for the above and it was something ridiculous like 99.2% of offenders were either family members or very close non-family.
  • Oh-Bollox 30 Aug 2013 01:01:34 5,435 posts
    Seen 45 minutes ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    It was the least favourite part of criminology for me, so I have little in the way of facts to hand, but it is overhwelmingly committed by family members, family friends, or family acquaintances.
  • localnotail 30 Aug 2013 08:49:52 23,093 posts
    Seen 10 months ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    I've got nothing empirical to back it up with, just memories of conversations with the consultant I did my psychiatry block with back in the mid-90s, who was a specialist in paedophilia. Child abuse outside of the family is often about social disconnection and isolation. These factors may well be more likely with smaller families, social mobility reducing community engagement, increased parental working hours and a rise in single parent families, all of which have been more common since WW2.

    So, yeah, just coming up with it, but it is an educated guess.

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  • Youthist 30 Aug 2013 09:02:52 10,083 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    And I suggest it has been going on forever, and it is only because we find out about it going on now being the reason it is now apparently or seemingly more widespread.

    "Good chess players think one move ahead. Great chess players think two or three moves ahead."

  • Rens11 30 Aug 2013 09:06:33 1,465 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    I dunno I'd argue its likely to been pretty much the same pre and post war, just that its reported more often now with attitudes to children and their rights improving over the years.

    Dont kid yourself, Jimmy. If a cow ever got the chance, hed eat you and everyone you care about!

  • Load_2.0 30 Aug 2013 09:13:22 19,681 posts
    Seen 13 minutes ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Nah everyone wants to be famous, ohhhhhh I got wanked off by Rolf.

    I say put the fame seeking "victms" in the same cell as the nonce. That will stem the tide of abuse.
  • LeoliansBro 10 Sep 2013 15:48:04 44,965 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    I'm a bit ashamed to find that I just assumed he was guilty.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • whatfruit 10 Sep 2013 15:49:40 1,694 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    I thought he was too. I bet he was as well. Dirty Dirty brown anorak man.

    He won't be asked to babysit anytime soon.

    bobomb wrote:
    so it's not really on her terms, it's on his terms, because she isn't real.

  • Grax 10 Sep 2013 15:50:25 2,296 posts
    Seen 11 hours ago
    Registered 1 year ago
    i think everyone did, it was bound to happen though. They couldn't convict everyone on tv in the 80's

    i jsut hope for the girls sake she was making it up, would hate to think that someone (anyone) could get away with ruining someones life like that. Though if she did make it up, then the reverse is true
  • billythekid 10 Sep 2013 15:51:20 11,403 posts
    Seen 48 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Cleared but tarnished probably forever.
    It is seriously wrong how the accused has no right to anonymity before conviction. Although in high profile cases I don't see how the identity could be kept secret.
  • Psychotext 10 Sep 2013 15:52:25 55,057 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    There will always be the suspicion.

    You really have to wonder what possessed the girl to go through with it (if he really, really was innocent).
  • LeoliansBro 10 Sep 2013 16:03:20 44,965 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Every high profile conviction, they should arrest five celebrities, given the four unconnected ones 10k, and try the fifth behind closed doors.

    LB, you really are a massive geek.

  • billythekid 10 Sep 2013 16:07:58 11,403 posts
    Seen 48 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    It's quite unimaginable the extent to which his life is now fucked. Not being able to go anywhere without people giving dirty looks, shouting abuse or even physical attacks.
    Even after being totally acquitted he'll still be known as peado Kev and the accuser can carry on her life with total impunity and anonymity.
    Seems only two people know what if anything happened between them, and one of them has to live with their conscience.
  • johnson81 10 Sep 2013 16:08:41 391 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    I think it's wrong for the tabloid's to be allowed to tar and feather a suspect before any convictions. Same with Matthew Kelly, every time I see him on the box, I think nonce. Wrong I know as he was cleared, but the doubt is always there.
  • Load_2.0 10 Sep 2013 16:14:12 19,681 posts
    Seen 13 minutes ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    I followed this, read some of the court statements. From that admittedly limited info the evidence/testimony was pretty tenuous IMO.

    No one can say what happened except for the those two but I am glad he wasn't convicted on the evidence that was I had seen.

    No real happy outcome in this situation, either way someone is getting fucked over.
  • whatfruit 10 Sep 2013 16:15:01 1,694 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    @Shikasama they will have him back and he will save a kid in the first few months maybe get him a good man family story line him doing the right thing. Memory forgotten was Ken Barlow ever convicted of being a nounce.

    bobomb wrote:
    so it's not really on her terms, it's on his terms, because she isn't real.

  • Grax 10 Sep 2013 16:17:21 2,296 posts
    Seen 11 hours ago
    Registered 1 year ago
    @whatfruit nah shik is right, they will pay him off. Even being cleared of all charges it is too much of a risk to their ratings.

    In about a year or two he will go on CBB and people will either change their minds about him or ofcom will get shit loads of complaints from the Jeremy Kyle crowd
  • Grax 10 Sep 2013 16:18:56 2,296 posts
    Seen 11 hours ago
    Registered 1 year ago
    what is the likelihood of this falling back on the accuser?? Because technically she should be in the firing line if the claims could be found baseless but who would want to take the risk
  • whatfruit 10 Sep 2013 16:24:07 1,694 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    @Grax How integral is he in Coronation street? Is he major character or is he on the way out anyway?

    If he still brings the ratings they will find a way for him to bounce back. Maybe stick him on the chat show circuit where he can have a amiable chat before explaining these "malicious" accusations. If Parky was still around he would be the #1 candidate.

    bobomb wrote:
    so it's not really on her terms, it's on his terms, because she isn't real.

  • BeardedGamerUK 10 Sep 2013 16:27:56 1,651 posts
    Seen 28 minutes ago
    Registered 1 year ago
    He'll end up being 'interviewed' by Piers Morgan.
  • nickthegun 10 Sep 2013 16:33:42 61,348 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    whatfruit wrote:
    @Grax How integral is he in Coronation street? Is he major character or is he on the way out anyway?
    They have, effectively, written him out. They put him on a bus to germany and I dont think anyone could care less if he came back.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    My man gives real loving that's why I call him Killer
    He's not a wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am, he's a thriller

  • Page

    of 131 First / Last

Log in or register to reply