If I accuse someone on here, will they get banned?
Paedogeddon - Jimmy Savile and other celebs • Page 58
-
Page
of 78 First / Last -
FWB 39,038 posts
Seen 2 minutes ago
Registered 11 years ago -
MrE26 1,844 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 8 years agoMy predictions for the next round of Celebrity Nonces: Cliff Richard & Noddy Holder. -
FWB 39,038 posts
Seen 2 minutes ago
Registered 11 years agoNoddy has already been picked up, no? -
MrE26 1,844 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 8 years agoReally? Shit, i missed that one! Cliff was my dead cert as well. -
nickthegun 44,246 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoI dont think so. I certainly saw enough of his gurning chimp face on christmas TV this year to make me think he hasnt formally been charged with anything.---------------------------------------------------------
AGP.SRPT -
HurbleBurble 1,373 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 3 years agoCliff definitely, will turn out The Young Ones is a polemic as to why small children 'shouldn't be afraid'. Of nonces.
Will also turn out that 'the song to be sung' will be Sweat by Inner Circle.
Edited by HurbleBurble at 12:39:14 03-01-2013 -
oceanmotion 13,111 posts
Seen 1 month ago
Registered 10 years agoCliff is just one of those, shagged so many women then realised he must be gay and turned to god to keep him in check because he thinks it is wrong. -
kickerconspiracy 495 posts
Seen 2 months ago
Registered 6 years ago -
nickthegun 44,246 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoThe original Celebrity Big Brother lineup was interesting this year. A racist nonce, a wife beater, a drugs cheat, an alky, a coke addict, a cake addict and a woman who sucked someone off in a layby.
hats off to channel 5 for securing such stellar talent.---------------------------------------------------------
AGP.SRPT -
FWB 39,038 posts
Seen 2 minutes ago
Registered 11 years agoQuick google looks like I got it wrong with Noddy. Was he not questioned?
Channel 5... I can't remember the last time I watched anything on that awful channel. Don't go near ITV aside from then CL either. -
Khanivor 38,670 posts
Seen 12 minutes ago
Registered 11 years ago25 years ago? Sexual assault is a hard one to prove when recent. I think that unless the alleged victim was a chid at the time there should be some statute of limitations on such things.
Especially in a country where people will splash the story about the way they can't stop eating carrots even though it makes them shot out of their eyeballs all over the front page of a newspaper for a few grand. -
warlockuk 18,599 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoIt'd be worth taking one for the team just to watch Violet do that.I'm a grumpy bastard.
-
LeoliansBro 35,019 posts
Seen 11 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoKhanivor wrote:
So, USA then?
Especially in a country where people will splash the story about the way they can't stop eating carrots even though it makes them shot out of their eyeballs all over the front page of a newspaper for a few grand.LB, you really are a massive geek.
-
Khanivor 38,670 posts
Seen 12 minutes ago
Registered 11 years agoThere's no equivalent of the Sun here, so no. Plus there are already statutes of limitations.
I'd also be curious to know if the police are using the definition of assault from 25 years ago or the current one. It's my understanding the definition has been broadened considerably over the years. -
LeoliansBro 35,019 posts
Seen 11 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoKhanivor wrote:
UK has printed news. US has news channels. 'And now, look at this fat talentless woman who can open her eyes really wide, wow! Cut to 20 mins of commercials.'
There's no equivalent of the Sun here.LB, you really are a massive geek.
-
Khanivor 38,670 posts
Seen 12 minutes ago
Registered 11 years agoMe thinks your kinda missing the points. -
LeoliansBro 35,019 posts
Seen 11 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoYep, attention seeking media whores are unique to the British Isles.LB, you really are a massive geek.
-
HurbleBurble 1,373 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 3 years ago@Khanivor Law cannot be applied retrospectively so will have to be applied as it was at the time. -
AgeOfChaos 255 posts
Seen 4 months ago
Registered 2 years agoAnyone seen the article on the Guardian right now? Questioning whether the actions of a man like savile are really harmful. I don't mind a debate, but I despaired for humanity while reading it. The Guardian can fuck off.
Edited by AgeOfChaos at 15:57:36 03-01-2013 -
RichieTenenbaum 1,613 posts
Seen 8 hours ago
Registered 2 years agoFor some reason, I don't believe Jim Davidson is guilty. Never seemed like the nonce type. -
jellyhead 24,346 posts
Seen 4 weeks ago
Registered 10 years agoPaedophilia: bringing dark desires to light
He says it's part of the human condition and spectrum of sexuality and we should all sit and have a chat rather than burning paedophiles at the stake as not all of them act upon their urges and encouraging them to talk should allow help to be given rather than suppressing desires until it reaches dangerous levels.
I can see what he's saying but it doesn't sit right with me. Though as is said not every paedophile is a child-abuser and not every child-abuser is a paedophile.
Still to me this fiasco is more about the complicit allowance of vulnerable adults to be in the company of and abused by celebrities and others of high status in society.
That's what disgusts me, the abuse of trust by those who were tasked with protecting the vulnerable.
Edited by jellyhead at 16:20:45 03-01-2013This signature intentionally left blank.
-
imamazed 1,744 posts
Seen 23 hours ago
Registered 6 years ago@RichieTenenbaum I think he's "only" accused of abusing two girls in their twenties. So a sex-offender but not a kiddy-fiddler.
Of course, I could be wrong on that. -
neilka 11,922 posts
Seen 48 minutes ago
Registered 8 years agojellyhead wrote:
Sounds like a bit of a nonce if you ask me.
Paedophilia: bringing dark desires to light
He says it's part of the human condition and spectrum of sexuality and we should all sit and have a chat rather than burning paedophiles at the stake as not all of them act upon their urges and encouraging them to talk should allow help to be given rather than suppressing desires until it reaches dangerous levels.if you have nothing intresting to say then you might as well just throw your bags on the truck and drive away
-
thelzdking 3,380 posts
Seen 19 hours ago
Registered 4 years agoAgeOfChaos wrote:
If you mean this article then you should probably read it a bit more closely.
Anyone seen the article on the Guardian right now? Questioning whether the actions of a man like savile are really harmful. I don't mind a debate, but I despaired for humanity while reading it. The Guardian can fuck off. -
RichieTenenbaum 1,613 posts
Seen 8 hours ago
Registered 2 years ago -
glaeken 10,366 posts
Seen 22 hours ago
Registered 8 years ago@RichieTenenbaum Well the allegations are from two women who would have been in their 20's at the time so I don't believe that would put him in nonce territory.
I have no problem believing Davidson might have been sexually aggressive given he was always in the tabloids at the time for womanising. I do think we are getting into a tricky area though when everyone at the time the crimes were said to have taken place would be adults. It's not as cut and dried as when one party clearly could not have given consent as in the case of paedophilia. This is something that happened between adults 25 years ago and you have to wonder how well any of them would remember the exact details of what happened. -
KennyPowers 94 posts
Seen 1 week ago
Registered 2 years ago
Edited by KennyPowers at 16:41:08 03-01-2013 -
AgeOfChaos 255 posts
Seen 4 months ago
Registered 2 years ago@thelzdking
Not having it mate. I applaud an attempt to approach things from a different angle, ask questions that should be asked etc. But there is no excuse for this type of thing. It's a strange article, and I wonder what direction it will take. -
RichieTenenbaum 1,613 posts
Seen 8 hours ago
Registered 2 years agoBasically it's ok to be a nonce as long as it's mainly googling what your doing and not fingerbanging the young. I think that's what the Guardian article is saying. -
@AgeOfChaos I agree there can be no excuse for it. However we have to bear in mind how different the general perception of some of these offences were in the seventies. While obviously sexual assault is still the same, perving on 14-16 year olds appears (from tv clips at least) to have been am everyday thing... Still is in the Daily Fail.
-
Page
of 78 First / Last
