I wonder how much of it is to do with teachers not having to refresh their knowledge base though.
LB, you really are a massive geek.
Thanks much.
Journey's end.
Loading...hold tight!
Page
of 116 First / LastLB, you really are a massive geek.
3DS: 4055-2781-2855
Xbox: darkmorgado
PSN: dark_morgan
LB, you really are a massive geek.
LeoliansBro wrote:No such thing, if you study it to a high enough level.
Hence the preference for static subjects.
Thanks for expressing interest in my signature!
Chopsen wrote:Talking GCSEs. But yeah.LeoliansBro wrote:No such thing, if you study it to a high enough level.
Hence the preference for static subjects.
LB, you really are a massive geek.
LB, you really are a massive geek.
darkmorgado wrote:Its a nice headline for the government but I doubt it will actually change much. I can't speak for the counties, but domestic incidents in the Met are taken extremely seriously and the definition of a domestic incident has always included those factors. Not sure if I'm reading it 100% correct but this appears to just introduce them as new offences.
About damn time
This post is sponsored by Apple and the iPhone 4S. Think different.
Tom_Servo wrote:Heh. "Please please please keep me as LD leader" is what I heard.
Nick Clegg apologises. This is definitely a good idea...
Ha, it's a non-apology apology!
darkmorgado wrote:First step towards making fifty shades of grey illegal
About damn time
Megapocalypse wrote:RE definition of domestic incidents, the problem was/is mainly with the sentencing and prosecution guidelines rather than how the police handle it and that seems to be the primary focus of these changes (though both need improvement, ultimately its the prosecution and sentencing that was in the greatest need of improvement). Without a separately defined offense of domestic violence, judges and magistrates find themselves restricted to using the sentencing guides for other offences that might broadly fit with certain aspects of domestic abuse without being able to take in the broader impact and scope of it. These changes might give some leeway for sentences that better fit the nature of the abuse rather than giving out minor assault sentences for what was actually sustained abuse over a period of time with more than a simple physical aspect.darkmorgado wrote:Its a nice headline for the government but I doubt it will actually change much. I can't speak for the counties, but domestic incidents in the Met are taken extremely seriously and the definition of a domestic incident has always included those factors. Not sure if I'm reading it 100% correct but this appears to just introduce them as new offences.
About damn time
However, increase offences and you increase amount of people getting arrested. Who's going to deal with the increased workload? I would guess the Met's DV units are the largest in the country and they are woefully understaffed (like every other unit). My area has a population of around 300,000. The DV unit consists of about 20 people including supervisors. At anyone time they will each be working on around 30 live investigations as well as preparing court cases. In the evenings when most incidents occur, there may be 3/4 people on. At weekends this will go down to 2.
And still the government want to give us more to, reduce our numbers and then blame us when the shit hits the fan.
3DS: 4055-2781-2855
Xbox: darkmorgado
PSN: dark_morgan
Megapocalypse wrote:G4S
However, increase offences and you increase amount of people getting arrested. Who's going to deal with the increased workload?
morriss wrote:
My actual real opinion is very insulting and unhelpful.
Page
of 116 First / Last