3D gaming : yes or no?

  • Page

    of 15 First / Last

    Previous
  • Deleted user 11 May 2010 15:42:55
    I've noticed lots of people stating that they have no interest in 3D TV and I'm curious as to why this is?
    I'm assuming it's because the "HD generation" is still relativley new and people don't want to spend yet more money on new equipment?.
    My assumption is though , even though we will be forced to buy 3D TV sets, our existing hardware will all receive upgrades (like the PS3) which will allow 3D to be compatible with it?
    Anyone who has played a game in 3D or watched a football game in 3D will realise how impressive and exciting it is.
    My 3D experience is limited : I have seen Avatar in a 3D IMAX, I have watched two football games in 3D and I purchased the GOTY Batman : AA and they have all impressed me (some more than others!).
    I think too many people still think of 3D as a gimmick that started in the 80's when the technology wasn't there to support it. Today, in 2010, we ARE ready for 3D and I am currently in the process of putting money together for my 3D upgrade - happy days.
  • ZuluHero 11 May 2010 15:46:03 4,482 posts
    Seen 3 days ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    YES. I'm still on an old flatscreen SDTV - when I buy a HDTV I will look for one with 3D.
  • Deleted user 11 May 2010 15:48:06
    No.
  • Psychotext 11 May 2010 15:48:38 56,552 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    No.
  • dominalien 11 May 2010 15:48:49 7,266 posts
    Seen 2 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Actually, after seeing a demo in a sony store, I'd say a tentative yes.

    PSN: DonOsito

  • Pac-man-ate-my-wife 11 May 2010 15:49:43 7,023 posts
    Seen 15 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    If I don't have to wear glasses I don't mind. If I do then I'm not interested.
  • malteaserhead 11 May 2010 15:50:06 13,443 posts
    Seen 1 month ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    No. It'll be too expensive and gimmicky for the first few years.
    3DS: more likely to get into that in 2011 than the whole big telly thing.
  • RyanDS 11 May 2010 15:50:47 10,436 posts
    Seen 18 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    No. Beacause I am half blind in one eye and it wuld be a waste for me. And if I can't have 3D then none of you fuckers should either.
  • Physically_Insane 11 May 2010 15:52:40 9,801 posts
    Seen 14 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    No
  • billythekid 11 May 2010 15:52:44 11,587 posts
    Seen 1 minute ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Yo
  • chasejamie 11 May 2010 15:52:49 818 posts
    Seen 2 months ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Yeah, I also can't see 3D so I can ignore all the fuss and concentrate on gameplay/story. I'm not bitter.
  • FogHeart 11 May 2010 15:54:34 1,040 posts
    Seen 7 minutes ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    Argh! It's so frustrating! Don't just say 'no'. Give reasons! "No, the cost/utility ratio is too high". "No, it kills my eyes." "No, I wear glasses and this leaves me behind" "No, the tech is inferior to xxxxxx" "No, it doesn't look good enough" "No, wearing cheap glasses mars my ultracool persona" etc.

    Is it so hard?
  • glaeken 11 May 2010 15:55:12 11,346 posts
    Seen 6 minutes ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    I am interested in it but not enough to buy a new TV interested. I just bought a nice 1080p TV set about 6 months back and plan for that to last me at least 5 years. My prior TV set actually lasted me over 10 years.

    Apart from my TV purchasing schedule I really don't believe there will be the non gaming content available to justify 3D for years yet. Buying into 3D at this stage is just going to cost you a big premium for a TV that will in all likelihood be superseded by something far better before 3D even starts to hit the big time. Far better to way and see for the moment.

    Personally I think we are actually 10 years off of seeing 3D as big thing in the home.
  • Physically_Insane 11 May 2010 15:55:46 9,801 posts
    Seen 14 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    FogHeart wrote:
    Argh! It's so frustrating! Don't just say 'no'. Give reasons! "No, the cost/utility ratio is too high". "No, it kills my eyes." "No, I wear glasses and this leaves me behind" "No, the tech is inferior to xxxxxx" "No, it doesn't look good enough" "No, wearing cheap glasses mars my ultracool persona" etc.

    Is it so hard?

    Because 3D is shit.
  • dutchspeededup 11 May 2010 15:56:05 5,484 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    FogHeart wrote:
    Argh! It's so frustrating! Don't just say 'no'. Give reasons! "No, the cost/utility ratio is too high". "No, it kills my eyes." "No, I wear glasses and this leaves me behind" "No, the tech is inferior to xxxxxx" "No, it doesn't look good enough" "No, wearing cheap glasses mars my ultracool persona" etc.

    Is it so hard?

    No.
  • estoo 11 May 2010 15:56:09 2,876 posts
    Seen 21 hours ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    No
  • Articulate-Troll 11 May 2010 15:56:38 3,100 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    3D is always coming and going. And the sooner it goes this time the better.
  • mcmonkeyplc 11 May 2010 15:56:53 39,732 posts
    Seen 18 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    Perhaps but no.

    Come and get it cumslingers!

  • DFawkes 11 May 2010 15:56:58 24,981 posts
    Seen 3 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Yes, I like 3D. It's the pricey specs that hurt most of the time, but I like anaglyph. I use iZ3D drivers on my PC that render pretty much any game I play 3D (except UK Truck Simulator, if that helps anyone).

    Grghl fnarr, grhl gnnrl! - Christina Bale as Batman

  • pinebear 11 May 2010 15:57:19 8,564 posts
    Seen 5 days ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    NeoGAF kills my eyes, goodness knows what pretend-3D will do to them.

  • heyyo 11 May 2010 15:57:45 14,364 posts
    Seen 4 months ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    pswii6o wrote:
    Today, in 2010, we ARE ready for 3D and I am currently in the process of putting money together for my 3D upgrade - happy days.

    No.
  • the_dudefather 11 May 2010 15:58:01 9,506 posts
    Seen 4 minutes ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    no...FOR NOW

    (ง ͠į ͟ʖ ͡į)

  • Lukus 11 May 2010 15:58:26 19,582 posts
    Seen 17 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Depends.

    Paintings & Photographs

  • Deleted user 11 May 2010 15:59:06
    pswii6o wrote:
    even though we will be forced to buy 3D TV sets
    Will we?
  • Deleted user 11 May 2010 15:59:54
    billythekid wrote:
    Yo
    Nes.
  • Lukey__b 11 May 2010 16:00:26 3,716 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    No.

    Iím another where 3D doesnít work with my current set of eyes. Well, the coloured/polarised glasses donít work anyway. Not sure about the ones that use Ďshutterí glasses or the tech where you donít use glasses at all. That I would be interested in seeing, but itís not something Iím gagging for simply because I donít think it would improve games that much.

    'Sup, what's guanine?

  • dutchspeededup 11 May 2010 16:00:50 5,484 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Cosmopolitan wrote:
    billythekid wrote:
    Yo
    Nes.

    Yo? Nes? When will we come together as one? You know, for the kids.
  • ronuds 11 May 2010 16:02:48 21,786 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    No.

    I don't see what the big deal is. It's still TV or a movie or a game - 3D makes it no better. We've had 3D for as long as I can remember... not sure why I'm supposed to suddenly care so much about it now.

    I don't remember anyone ever clamouring for it when movies weren't being made in 3D. We get Avatar in 3D and suddenly I'm not supposed to be able to live without it? HAHA! This is the TV makers telling us what we want, rather than us telling them.

    Well, I do not want.
  • Page

    of 15 First / Last

    Previous
Log in or register to reply