Batman Arkham Asylum in favourable comparison to the Xbox 360 version shocker!

  • Page

    of 4 First / Last

    Previous
  • m0thr4 28 Aug 2009 15:05:06 787 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Still expecting Digital Foundry to give the PS3 version the customary bashing but enjoy this one while it lasts:

    http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=14110
  • Retroid Moderator 28 Aug 2009 15:05:37 44,724 posts
    Seen 20 minutes ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Awww, bless.
  • Deleted user 28 August 2009 15:05:56
    I can't glean any enjoyment from this. My purchase of the 360 doesn't feel justified anymore.

    AND ITS ALL YOUR FAULT.
  • Dirtbox 28 Aug 2009 15:09:29 78,133 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    Marginal suck margin.

    +1 / Like / Tweet this post

  • Retroid Moderator 28 Aug 2009 15:10:07 44,724 posts
    Seen 20 minutes ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    /Reads

    So.... in other words, it's damned close.

    A SHOCKING WIN THERE
  • Syrette 28 Aug 2009 15:10:33 43,430 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    m0thr4 wrote:
    Still expecting Digital Foundry to give the PS3 version the customary bashing

    Oh do be quiet.

  • funkyd 28 Aug 2009 15:11:03 7,522 posts
    Seen 11 months ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    I like how PS3 fan boys can't take it when Digital Foundry doesn't prefer the PS3 version, so it must be MONEYHATS
  • L_Franko Moderator 28 Aug 2009 15:11:36 9,694 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    Thank god I now know which version is best.
    My life seems somehow complete. I'm free!
  • Dirtbox 28 Aug 2009 15:12:22 78,133 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    There has to be at least three multiformat games where the PS3 comes out on top.

    +1 / Like / Tweet this post

  • Fletche 28 Aug 2009 15:13:26 3,418 posts
    Seen 8 months ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    I really couldn't give a toss, too much crap is spoken in regards to which version is the best, if you enjoy playing the version on the console of your choice then I don't think you missing out by not playing the other version that has a miniscule faster frame rate
  • neilka 28 Aug 2009 15:13:44 15,907 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    The ST version will be better.

    A map is like comparing velocity and speed.

  • Deleted user 28 August 2009 15:14:10
    They're both roundly shat upon by the PC version however and I can use my 360 controller on without any farting about.
  • Deleted user 28 August 2009 15:14:39
    C64 is better than Spectrum.

    FACT.

    Amstrad CPC can fuck right off.
  • Deleted user 28 August 2009 15:15:02
    boabg wrote:
    They're both roundly shat upon by the PC version however and I can use my 360 controller on without any farting about.

    potentialhardwareconflictsandlackofsofalol
  • Deleted user 28 August 2009 15:15:59
    Yu bluddy idyut.
  • m0thr4 28 Aug 2009 15:16:37 787 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Retroid wrote:
    /Reads

    So.... in other words, it's damned close.

    A SHOCKING WIN THERE

    No, it wins. Actually wins. As in, "better", albeit marginally. This hardly ever happens for the PS3 so true fans of that platform (as opposed to the sulking Xbots I seem to have enraged thus far) should appreciate this.
  • andymale 28 Aug 2009 15:16:44 9 posts
    Seen 8 months ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    squarejawhero wrote:
    C64 is better than Spectrum.

    FACT.


    SO true.
  • Deleted user 28 August 2009 15:16:50
    squarejawhero wrote:
    C64 is better than Spectrum.

    FACT.

    Amstrad CPC can fuck right off.

    Amstrad CPC 464 has the amazing cartridge slot so you could pretend it was a console.

    Bit like Windows Live in an abstract way :p
  • neilka 28 Aug 2009 15:19:41 15,907 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    When's the Game & Watch version out?

    A map is like comparing velocity and speed.

  • neilka 28 Aug 2009 15:20:11 15,907 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    uglygamer wrote:
    squarejawhero wrote:
    Yu bluddy idyut.

    Do you thinki its worth changing it and going back all the way to shop for the PS3 version?
    Yes, go now! RUN LIKE THE WIND!

    A map is like comparing velocity and speed.

  • GeeMacca 28 Aug 2009 15:20:20 2,794 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    I don't remember any of these head to heads for older generations of consoles, especially to the point where everyone gets their knickers in such a twist about them, either way, unless you DO play them side by side, you'll never notice. File under who cares.
  • Darren 28 Aug 2009 15:20:33 8,808 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    m0thr4 wrote:
    Still expecting Digital Foundry to give the PS3 version the customary bashing but enjoy this one while it lasts:

    http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=14110

    Oddly, they made no mention of the 360's 2xAA versus the PS3's 0xAA something I noticed straight away from playing both demos, but I guess the free Joker DLC swung the vote in the PS3's favour. That's fair enough but ignoring the extra content, which doesn't come on the disc anyway, the 360 version is, unsurprisingly, the better of the two technically even if the differences are only marginal. ;)

    PS3, PS4, PS Vita, Wii U, Xbox One, PC (Intel Core i7-4770K, 16 GB, 3 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780, Windows 8.1 Pro), iPad 4, iPad mini with Retina Display.

  • cianchristopher 28 Aug 2009 15:20:46 6,360 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    @m0thr4: That Lens of Truth article didn't even mention the fact that the Xbox 360 version has 2x AA whereas the PS3 version has none at all. In my book, that's crap. Anti Aliasing is a crucial part of a "which graphics are better" debate. Also, they pretty much ignored the benefits of SSAO on the 360 version (again completely absent on the PS3 version) which is also a big plus for the Xbox.

    Instead they said stuff like "ooh the camera's a bit further back from Batman on the PS3" and "we think the lighting and shadows are better". Which is fair enough, and I'm not disputing the camera, lighting or shadows preference. But DF at least provide details on framerate drops and torn frames and anti-aliasing etc. So I'll take their word for it over the Lens of Truth.
  • Deleted user 28 August 2009 15:21:13
    I buy two copies of all my games.
  • mrpon 28 Aug 2009 15:21:56 28,893 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    andymale wrote:
    squarejawhero wrote:
    C64 is better than Spectrum.

    FACT.


    SO true.
    Go away Tony Hadley.

    Give yourself 5 or gig, you're worth it.

  • Azazel 28 Aug 2009 15:24:24 726 posts
    Seen 3 weeks ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    squarejawhero wrote:
    C64 is better than Spectrum.

    FACT.

    Amstrad CPC can fuck right off.

    Outside NOW.
  • cianchristopher 28 Aug 2009 15:26:01 6,360 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 5 years ago
    Also, read the comments beneath that Lens of Truth article. They're all talking about the better graphics on the Xbox 360 version.
  • Page

    of 4 First / Last

    Previous
Log in or register to reply