itinkuravinalaff wrote:Game Trailers gave it a 8.8.
7.9/10 How much were IGN paid!!?
Resident Evil 6 • Page 28
-
Page
of 42 First / Last -
-
Trafford 4,004 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 5 years ago39/40 from Famitsu... -
MadCaddy13 1,268 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 4 years agoJust don't see it as a resi game. See it as a whole new ip and you'll feel slightly better
Edited by MadCaddy13 at 18:58:31 01-10-2012 -
Steve_Perry 607 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 10 months agotheguy wrote:
Yeah I think its fair to note that his reviews are hardly the most balanced online. Bit of an attention seeker.Steve_Perry wrote:
Although it is Jim Sterling writing that review, i find that i quite agree with it and had similar problems. I don't think this game would've fared very well if it didn't carry the Resident Evil branding
3/10 Destructiod review. Ouch. -
theguy 630 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 2 years agoThe 4/10 review of assassins creed 2 put me off his reviews somewhat but i find myself agreeing to an extent with his resi review based on the demo -
GeezaTap 279 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoAnyone know how many gb the ps3 download version is?.gif)
-
-cerberus- 816 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 2 years agooi wrote: Game Trailers gave it a 8.8.
9 for design, 8.8 for story and 8.2 for gameplay. Fucking madness."You see it too? For me, it's always like this..."
(Angela Orosco - Silent Hill 2) -
Ironlungs76 3,542 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 3 years agoTrafford wrote:
I fully expect an incoherent flashmob of fingertwitchers from Famitsu website to come and claim that it's the best thing since Darkfall.
39/40 from Famitsu... -
King_Edward 9,343 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 3 years agoSteve_Perry wrote:
He's also a bit of an old Resi die-hard.theguy wrote:
Yeah I think its fair to note that his reviews are hardly the most balanced online. Bit of an attention seeker.Steve_Perry wrote:
Although it is Jim Sterling writing that review, i find that i quite agree with it and had similar problems. I don't think this game would've fared very well if it didn't carry the Resident Evil branding
3/10 Destructiod review. Ouch.
Even so, the game is clearly a bit of a stinker. -
spudsbuckley 3,808 posts
Seen 1 hour ago
Registered 5 years agoIs the game even that shit though?
My problem with it is that it's a generic-as-fuck action based third person shooter which i've played before a billion times. The industry is just incredibly stagnant now.
It's almost not the devs/publishers fault that it ended up like this. There are only a few different types of game now so they had to slot it into one of the pigeon holes for it to actually sell. -
darkmorgado 22,527 posts
Seen 2 seconds ago
Registered 4 years agoThe CVG review is up there in "questionable" territory -
No scares, no surprises, lots and lots of shooting...
Resi 6 delivers plenty of bang for your buck, and co-op makes everything better. But is it worth a more discerning dollar? Let's put it this way: we wouldn't buy it full price.
Samey shooting starts to grind
8/10
Zero scares
QTE sections wrestle control from you, vehicles drive like boxes on wheels
O_oNow with 80% more Cthulhu!
-
Goodfella 1,951 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 8 years ago8/10 after those comments?
Something is amiss. -
King_Edward 9,343 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 3 years agoMost of the positive reviews seems to based on the amount of game there, rather than the quality. It is like 3 (average) games in one.
Also, shut up Spuds.gif)
-
MadCaddy13 1,268 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 4 years agoTrafford wrote:
Holy shit I thought you was joking
39/40 from Famitsu... -
Steve_Perry 607 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 10 months agoThe cvg one certainly doesn't read like an 8. -
stryker1121 439 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 4 years agoReviews are all over the place. Even w/ Sterling's hyperbole on the D-toid review, Cap's full-on action switchover from RE4 to RE5 was a massive warning sign for this one. Combine that with what the "AAA" industry is aiming for today in terms of sales and you have the so-called "Michael Bay game" that disconnected publishers think gamers want. -
Derblington 19,631 posts
Seen 7 minutes ago
Registered 9 years agoKing_Edward wrote:
Pleeeeease!
Also, shut up Spuds -
Trafford 4,004 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 5 years agoWell a 6 from EG & Edge is encouraging. I'll pick this up before the year is out.
Poverty knocks, so will be looking for a pre crimbo bargain.
I only have this and XCom on my radar anyhow. -
Goodfella 1,951 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 8 years agostryker1121 wrote:
This perfectly sums it up and is applicable for most business practices these days. It's not what the consumers want, it's what the shareholders want.
Reviews are all over the place. Even w/ Sterling's hyperbole on the D-toid review, Cap's full-on action switchover from RE4 to RE5 was a massive warning sign for this one. Combine that with what the "AAA" industry is aiming for today in terms of sales and you have the so-called "Michael Bay game" that disconnected publishers think gamers want.
Fuck you Capcom, fuck all you other lazy bean counting publishers and corporate cunts.
RIP Resident Evil.*
*Sadly this game will sell like hot cakes to the casual crowd and Capcom won't give a fuck. -
SolidSCB 4,532 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 4 years agoCan't even be arsed finishing this. I desperately want to like this. I love everything Resident Evil. I even enjoy the movies a great deal for fucks sake. This though, this is pure, 100% genuine authentic horse shit. -
darkmorgado 22,527 posts
Seen 2 seconds ago
Registered 4 years agoPretty surprised that Games tm went with a 7/10 after the epic trolling they gave it in a recent preview where they basically said it was a candidate for worst game of the year.Now with 80% more Cthulhu!
-
spudsbuckley 3,808 posts
Seen 1 hour ago
Registered 5 years agodarkmorgado wrote:
The cheque cleared.
Pretty surprised that Games tm went with a 7/10 after the epic trolling they gave it in a recent preview where they basically said it was a candidate for worst game of the year. -
darkmorgado 22,527 posts
Seen 2 seconds ago
Registered 4 years ago -
StarchildHypocrethes 22,486 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoHoly fucking utterly wank vehicle sections, Batman! I think I might be done with this shit. -
-cerberus- 816 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 2 years agohello_fi wrote:Your butthurt about Resi is really starting to grate. You've openly admitted you haven't even played the game, so how can you call it "madness"?
I've been playing video games for quite a while now and can smell a stinker from a mile away. Having played the second demo, I can say with certainty that I would never give it a 9 for design, 8.8 for story and 8.2 for gameplay. Because it's fucking madness.
I played the demo and it wasn't for me so won't be getting it, but I'm not making it a mission to tell everyone how shit it is and telling those who enjoyed it that they are wrong."You see it too? For me, it's always like this..."
(Angela Orosco - Silent Hill 2) -
joelstinton 3,999 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoitinkuravinalaff wrote:
I don't know. Their review scores entirely exist in the 7-10 scale. So pratically the game got 0.9/3
7.9/10 How much were IGN paid!!?PSN - Cloudsheaven
3ds: 0645-5746-4715
www.joelstinton.wordpress.com -
darkmorgado 22,527 posts
Seen 2 seconds ago
Registered 4 years agoAn 8.8 for story for any Resi game is madness, frankly.Now with 80% more Cthulhu!
-
darkmorgado 22,527 posts
Seen 2 seconds ago
Registered 4 years agoStarchildHypocrethes wrote:
If it helps the Ada campaign is actually meant to be pretty damn good from what I've heard.
Holy fucking utterly wank vehicle sections, Batman! I think I might be done with this shit.
As in "they should have just jettisoned all the others and just focussed on making the whole game around her" good. Apparently it's also even more old-school resi than Leon's too, with proper puzzles and everything.Now with 80% more Cthulhu!
-
I see a rather large shitstorm has erupted over at CVG towers.
Rob Crossley has intervened in the comments saying he doesn't think it's a good review, and Rich Stanton has gone on twitter saying "HATE having my stuff on CVG. Fuck that site" and also accusing sites that give the game a bad score are lowballing. Despite his own text matching up pretty exactly with all of the lower-scoring reviews elsewhere. Some very poor professionalism there. Funnily enough, he's a contributor to EG, who would count among the sites he is accusing of deliberately lowballing. I think he hasn't done his career any favours at all with all this.
Which all suggests to me that, quite simply, the review should be taken down by CVG, re-done by someone else, and Rich Stanton shouldn't have his work published on CVG anymore (or anywhere else he just collectively insulted like EG, Edge, etc).
At least Rob Crossley managed to maintain his professionalism in his response.
Edited by darkmorgado at 05:26:14 02-10-2012Now with 80% more Cthulhu!
-
Page
of 42 First / Last
