Seems odd for a non-headliner to feature on the poster though, when Jet Li doesn't.
Either that or they all look the same.
Either that or they all look the same.
GHOSTBUSTERS
The Expendables • Page 8
-
Page
of 10 First / Last -
meme 15,810 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 5 years ago -
LFMartins 5,704 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 7 years ago -
jablonski 1,303 posts
Seen 14 hours ago
Registered 2 years agoBig smile when Norris gets a shot!
Despite hating the first one, I'll be in the cinema for this one. -
speedofthepuma 12,918 posts
Seen 11 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoThought the first was rather poor, but I will fall for the concept all over again I think.I've turned off all the avatars and crap, so don't expect me to be impressed by yours.
-
disusedgenius 4,936 posts
Seen 1 hour ago
Registered 6 years agoI really enjoyed the first so I'll be catching this. Directed by the guy who did Con Air as well (and... err.. Tomb Raider!) so here's hoping it'll be deserving of the cast. -
beastmaster 8,177 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoFucking Chuck Fucking Norris! I hope he gets some decent screen time. It's good to see him back. -
Lexx87 20,873 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 7 years agoI enjoyed the first one. It was complete fluff but still enjoyable fluff all the same.Speak the truth hussy!
-
LFMartins 5,704 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 7 years ago -
cianchristopher 6,360 posts
Seen 11 months ago
Registered 4 years agoTerrible decision to make this PG-13. Terrible decision to include Chuck Norris, tbh. Even his stupidest 80s films fail as an example of cheesy guilty pleasures.
Then, having Simon West directing just ensures a bland affair. This'll be fucking godawful. I thought the whole point was to do an OTT 80s-style bloodbath, not a fucking family-friendly action franchise. -
Stallone confirmed it on AICN that it is indeed a PG-13 - boo.You dare to strike Scurrcules!?
-
richarddavies 2,567 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 4 years agoScurrminator wrote:
That webisite is a liar. That ain't cool news. That's not very cool news at all.
Stallone confirmed it on AICN that it is indeed a PG-13 - boo. -
beastmaster 8,177 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoAh, the bloodless, curseless PG-13. It'll probaby be a 15 over here the same as it the first one was on cinematic relase. It changed for the BR.
Most 15 certificates are quite strong these days anyhow.
Whatever Chuck says, goes! Otherwise, he'll kick your fucking head off! -
AdmiralPellaeon 346 posts
Seen 2 months ago
Registered 5 years agocianchristopher wrote:
Amen Brother!
I thought the whole point was to do an OTT 80s-style bloodbath, not a fucking family-friendly action franchise.
If this is getting the Terminator 3 treatment they can just fuck off! -
kingnothing12 481 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 6 years agoSo Norris can break necks and shoot people but he can't say the odd curse word, excuse me but...fuck Norris. -
LFMartins 5,704 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 7 years agoThatīs the American way. Violence is okay, swear words and sex are not. Their ratings rules are strange as hell, for example, you can say fuck 2 times and get a PG-13 but if the movie has someone saying the word fuck 3 times then itīs an automatic R. -
LFMartins 5,704 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 7 years agoI love how Harry Knowles from AICN tried to make it like this isnīt a big deal and then one other writer from AICN goes and writes this on an article about the awesome indonesian action movie The Raid.
I can't wait!
Edited by LFMartins at 19:24:37 20-01-2012
Whatever its rating is, I hope they knock it down to PG or something. Cuz, you know, badassness is awesomer that way...all watered down and whatnot
-
whatthefu 760 posts
Seen 9 hours ago
Registered 7 years agowhat a joke.
take your chuck norris and your pg-13 and go fuck yourself -
meme 15,810 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 5 years agoStill, at least this'll hopefully put an end to Chuck Norris facts.GHOSTBUSTERS
-
whatfruit 418 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 2 years agoGary Busey is missing as the villan. -
Fatiguez 8,355 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 5 years agoChuck Norris can slam a revolving door
but he chooses not to because he finds it offensiveshow me your tits u bitch from ubisoft
-
The-Bodybuilder 11,595 posts
Seen 12 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoCam anyone confirm that, to make it the ultimate 70s/80s action movie, they're gonna have Bruce Lee in a small role?
What? -
whatthefu 760 posts
Seen 9 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoToo early for that sorta thing.
hes only just died -
The-Bodybuilder 11,595 posts
Seen 12 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoAh true. Besides, that's why they got Jet Li. All the same innit? #Racist. -
beastmaster 8,177 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoI'm worried this will turn into a Die Hard 4.0 PG-13 type thingy. -
Fozzie_bear 15,171 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 11 years agoVulgar language = BAD!
Neck breaking = FINE, CARRY ON!
If you're worried about the children, that's an odd set of priorities.Support the Mowgli Dirty Protest!
-
richardiox 5,029 posts
Seen 19 minutes ago
Registered 9 years agoChurch>Children -
oceanmotion 13,385 posts
Seen 10 hours ago
Registered 10 years agoSurprised they even considered Chuck Norris. Every one of his films are weak sauce.
The original Expendables was dull anyway. It has nothing on 80s film other than a couple of actors. About two scenes were fun, the rest was forgettable. It's a waste of fun talent. -
LFMartins 5,704 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 7 years agoBootleg trailer but hey, itīs Stallone fighting Van Damme, who is the villain called (and Iīm not joking) Jean Vilain and thereīs a scene with Arnie shooting and Bruce Willis driving a fucking Smart.
-
And now, the official release of the trailer.
Edit: Oh yeah, the movie is no longer PG-13, it will be R rated.
Edited by LFMartins at 18:21:45 03-05-2012 -
Page
of 10 First / Last
