MONSTERS VERSUS ALIENS
-
Page
of 2 First / Last -
Is that Kiefer Sutherland's voice I hear?
-
macksed 3,796 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 8 years agoSUUUSAAAAAAN ... glol! -
Dragul 5,478 posts
Seen 7 days ago
Registered 9 years agoLooked hot. Might be really fun! -
Fife 364 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 5 years agoET GO HOME, hahaha looks nice. -
macksed 3,796 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 8 years ago -
PinkSpider 3,346 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 9 years agoThat looks quite cool.
Infact I want to watch it all now pls. -
PinkSpider 3,346 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 9 years agoThat looks quite cool.
Infact I want to watch it all now pls. -
I agree and the double posting makes it MORE SO NOW PLS.
-
Razz 58,183 posts
Seen 20 minutes ago
Registered 11 years agoSaw a trailer for this recently. Looks like loads of fun..gif)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Steam/PSN/XBOX: Razztafarai | 3DS: 1246-9674-8856
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -
Toonster 6,763 posts
Seen 12 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoI saw it last week.
I'd give it about 65%. It's typical Dreamworks fare (excluding the first two Shreks and KFP).
It looks beautiful and there's some amazing animation in it, but the writers really pulled some strings in some parts of the story. It has its funny moments and its share of clever gags, although the blue blob (excellently voiced by Seth Rogen) steals a great deal of them. I really didn't care for the characters, except maybe a tiny bit for the main character, Susan.
So yeah, it's fun and entertaining and looks great, but don't expect the brilliance of KFP. It doesn't even touch that level IMO.
One big plus: Steven Colbert voices the President! -
First two Shrek films?
/scoffs
Anyway, obviously I need to go and see this as well. 'Twould be a bit silly not to really.
Did you get to see it in 3D Toonster? -
ecureuil 74,328 posts
Seen 14 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoI only want to see this because Stephen Colbert is in it. No way I'm going to the cinema on my own to see this movie though, that'd be just a little bit creepy. -
Toonster 6,763 posts
Seen 12 hours ago
Registered 8 years agodisussedgenius wrote:
IMO, the first two Shreks were the pinnacle of Dreamworks animation. The second one wasn't as good as the first, but I still liked the story and it had some great characters and humour. If it makes you feel any better, I thought the third one was pants. Kung Fu Panda, while a great movie, had some kinks in the story. It slightly bothered me how Po suddenly became a kung fu expert through a five-minute montage
First two Shrek films?
/scoffs
Anyway, obviously I need to go and see this as well. 'Twould be a bit silly not to really.
Did you get to see it in 3D Toonster?
And I did see it in 3D, which sort of enhances the experience but there are a couple times when the movie purposefully throws an object right in your face in a way that says, "oooo, look how 3D it is!"
Slightly changing the subject, but if there is an animation that is beautiful, really entertaining, extremely memorable and makes good use of the 3D, I would highly recommend Coraline. Don't know when it comes out in the UK. -
ecureuil 74,328 posts
Seen 14 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoIt's out on April 3rd over here.
Oh god, the cast list. Stephen Colbert, Hugh Laurie, Will Arnett, Seth Rogen, Kiefer Sutherland, Jeffrey Tambor, Paul Rudd. Also Amy Poehler, and I know she and Will Arnett are married, but it's a little odd that they always seem to appear in the same things.
Still, that's a phenomenal cast list. I really can't go see this on my own though. :/ -
Tomo 13,435 posts
Seen 2 minutes ago
Registered 10 years agoGot 4 stars in Empire, although it's hardly the tome it once used to be. -
ecureuil 74,328 posts
Seen 14 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoJust saw it, pretty good movie. The cast list was as good as I hoped, but Seth Rogen really made the movie - every one of his scenes was gold. Hugh Laurie was also very good, with his manical laughter, but Colbert was a little underused. Plus, they should have modelled the President in his image. Loved the nod to Close Encounters. -
martyngates 1,752 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 9 years agoPretty poor film and not very kiddie, all the humor seemed quite adult with very few points that really stand out
Saw it in 3D but didnt look as good as Bolt, just seemed to be in 3D because they could rather than for adding anything to it
Did anyone else find the 2 music scenes just embarrasing to watch rather than 'cool'!
-
Kafeen 493 posts
Seen 44 minutes ago
Registered 8 years agomartyngates wrote:
I thought the 3D was done better than in Bolt. In Bolt I found that images became quite blurry when they appeared to come far out of the screen. Monsters vs aliens stayed nice and sharp.
Pretty poor film and not very kiddie, all the humor seemed quite adult with very few points that really stand out
Saw it in 3D but didnt look as good as Bolt, just seemed to be in 3D because they could rather than for adding anything to it
Did anyone else find the 2 music scenes just embarrasing to watch rather than 'cool'!
-
Goban 8,932 posts
Seen 1 week ago
Registered 7 years agomartyngates wrote:
That's pretty much what I though of Bolt 3D.
Saw it in 3D but didnt look as good as Bolt, just seemed to be in 3D because they could rather than for adding anything to it
I enjoyed MvA, some nice little nods to classic sci-fi. The kids enjoyed it and I was entertained, what more do you want.
Edit: a lot better than Madagascar 2 -
RetardStrong 3,225 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 5 years agosquarejawhero wrote:
Uh, I'm sorry but I thought Kung Fu panda was terrible.
This will be good, given how excellent Kung Fu Panda was. -
d0bbo 688 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 10 years agodisussedgenius wrote:
I met an animator from Dreamworks in a Starbucks in Tokyo a few weeks back (how jet setty am I?). Anyway, he reckons that Shrek 4 is the best they've ever made.
First two Shrek films? -
RetardStrong wrote:
Good for you.squarejawhero wrote:
Uh, I'm sorry but I thought Kung Fu panda was terrible.
This will be good, given how excellent Kung Fu Panda was.
/golf clap -
Razz 58,183 posts
Seen 20 minutes ago
Registered 11 years agoRetardStrong wrote:
That it was. Well not terrible, but certainly not worthy of the praise it often gets. Imo, average at best.squarejawhero wrote:
Uh, I'm sorry but I thought Kung Fu panda was terrible.
This will be good, given how excellent Kung Fu Panda was.--------------------------------------------------------------------
Steam/PSN/XBOX: Razztafarai | 3DS: 1246-9674-8856
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -
uglygamer 11,590 posts
Seen 29 minutes ago
Registered 5 years agoIt was decent. Nothing special, not as good as Halo. I will say 7/10 good. -
ecureuil 74,328 posts
Seen 14 hours ago
Registered 8 years ago -
Toonster 6,763 posts
Seen 12 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoecureuil wrote:
O_O wow, so one of the movie's better moments is completely ripped off?
lol bengali.
Anyway.. WTF. Date added: 03 May 2007
One other thing about MvA is that they literally showed all the funniest moments in the trailers. -
ecureuil 74,328 posts
Seen 14 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoCould just be a coincidence.. -
It probably isn't, to be honest; look at the Antz/Bug's Life - Finding Nemo/Shark's Tale evidence.
And yeah, as I said in the film review thread, it ain't great. Few funny moments, but kids don't get the references for the characters and adults grow bored of this ultra-colourful shallow pap fast. -
Page
of 2 First / Last
