Who's comparing? I just KNEW someone would say that, it's lkike you can't mention another game (as an example of a slick playing game) without people assuming you can't see the differences. Didn't you see the part where I said *I KNOW BURNOUT ISN'T TRYING TO DO EVEN HALF AS MUCH AS GTA*
It doesn't matter what I compare it to - ANY slick/fast/good interacting game would have been valid.
I'm not stupid, I know they are pushing things and that is my whole point, it's like it's become and excuse for poor performance these days, i'm striving for devs to reach a balance and not fuck us over on performance/interaction just so they can hit bullet points and make great looking static pre-release shots.
To think i'm trying to compare those games and saying 'waaah burnout can do it' is way off and insulting. I'm saying that rockstart should strive to get that good performance as a base then layer on what they can without loosing it. There are reasons many simpler games exist and that's because there are still gamers in the world who will take fast/slick experiences over bogged down jeryky worlds who 'if only they ran faster would be perfect'.
man, sometimes I wonder how selective reading becomes part of so many people's lives. read everything and factor in you can't see my tone of voice in pure text. I like GTA, but it has big issues (and not being sold by the homeless kind either)
#3266921, By sharpfish Official GTA IV thread *contains some spoilers*
sharpfish 15 posts
Seen 7 years ago
Registered 9 years ago