This whole Occams Razor debate seems rather pointless. I've never heard of it before but from what I can gather it would work like this: Fact: my fridge is empty. Conclusion: i shall starve to death. Since that is the simplest conclusion I can draw. Ah but there's a shop down the road? No I can't consider that as I have no proof to say it's either closed or has no stock, therefore I must only reach a conclusion on known facts. Clearly this has led me to a conclusion that is utterly useless and inaccurate.
Can someone then explain what benefit or relevance OR holds for anything?
Can someone then explain what benefit or relevance OR holds for anything?
