kalel wrote:See, from a 'violent conduct' point of view I think it is in absolutely no way close to your average violent tackle, I think Hazard was frustrated but there was no malice, he was very calm and I don't think he intended to even touch the kid, just to get the ball back.
Agree entirely with your second bit though, that's why I'm confused it was for violent conduct, and not for bringing the game into disrepute
#9322914, By convz The League Cup
convz 242 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 3 years ago