#9400524, By silentbob Crysis 3

  • silentbob 26 Feb 2013 23:02:35 29,229 posts
    Seen 2 weeks ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    Pumpatron wrote:
    silentbob wrote:
    Also, Crysis 3 is good. Far better than the restrictive, series-of-shoeboxes, paint by numbers '2' but waaaay behind the gloriousness-ness-ss of the original Crysis.

    Do people forget about the average opening levels and poor closing ones when talking about the original crysis?

    Crysis's middle levels were brilliant, Crysis at it's best - huge environments, loads of freedom, but interesting with enough to keep you occupied. The earlier levels were big, but a bit sparse. And the closing levels were poor. Crysis 1 was half a great game. For me 2 was the better game overall. I'm looking forward to 3, but waiting for a price drop.
    As I played through it again recently, so I remember just fine what all the maps were like. The issue is that, Crysis is a corridor shooter trying to pretend it's not. The visuals were bland, the maps were uber restrictive and the whole thing felt like a massive step backwards.

    Crysis was good because I enjoyed being immersed in the world and discovering for myself the best tactical solution to the scenario. Crysis 2 had to paint the limited options over the screen in neon for you in every new shoe-box you encountered.

    Actually - the biggest thing missing from Crysis 2 which makes a very welcome return in 3, I can take my time! 2 was all 'GO GO NOW NOW!' and there are elements of that in 3, but I've been able to ponder and procrastinate over levels far more than Crysis 2 ever had the patience for.

    So, you may well prefer Crysis 2, but that probably means you don't like the essence that made the franchise great.
Log in or register to reply