Inertia, I get what you mean. Like I say, maths is an abstract system and it doesn't diminish it or bring in subjectivity to say that it can't be used to prove facts within empirical systems.|
I don't have anything more to add to what Chopsen says above. I think Newton is an amusing example to pick though. He was aware that his laws of gravity did not correctly describe the orbit of Mercury - and he ascribed this to god interfering with its orbit! So his flaw was that he was mixing an embryonic form of science with a 'faith' system. Our (incomplete) knowledge of gravity today only shows the power of the scientific method and its triumph over other claimed systems of knowledge.
Edited by JammyB at 22:53:05 14-02-2012
#8423392, By JammyB Militant Secularisation
JammyB 756 posts
Seen 6 months ago
Registered 11 years ago