#9361574, By TarickStonefire A Good Day To Die Hard

  • TarickStonefire 11 Feb 2013 16:28:25 4,572 posts
    Seen 30 minutes ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    Aretak wrote:
    Then again, 2 and 3 were both shit too, so it's not like it's ruining a classic franchise or anything. Easy enough to pretend the first one has nothing to do with any of them.
    Wha-huh? Oh come on, 1 and 2 are both 'Die Hard' classics. I mean 1 has the obvious advantage of being so unexpectedly awesome, but 2 was also great fun and kept it all in one place (mostly) which I liked.

    3 just feels like any old action romp really, but it's still a fun enough film that just happens to have John McClane and a Brit in a dodgy accent in it.

    It's just 4 that phoned it in fun-wise, so far. Well, for me anyway.

    Edited by TarickStonefire at 16:29:13 11-02-2013
Log in or register to reply