kalel wrote:Just cause I hate to see you right about anything:
He's 22 years old. As a striker he's not supposed to be at his prime at this age. I don't think selling him at a lower price than they paid for him can be considered depreciation when he's supposed to have his best years ahead of him.
Berba on the other hand was bought at his peak. So selling him had a factor of depreciation included AND yes there was a significant loss.
So in conclusion, see the first line.
Edited by mcmonkeyplc at 11:19:35 31-01-2013
Come and get it cumslingers!