Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

Advertisement

Xbox 360 vs. PS3 Face-Off: Round 22 Face-off

Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 Face-off by Richard Leadbetter

2 November, 2009

Page 2 of 4. <- Page 1Page 3 ->

Tekken 6

Quite often we talk about sub-HD resolutions during these face-offs, and usually when one version is running with fewer pixels than the other it is an obviously noticeable bad thing. Tekken 6 is the exception to the rule, and one of the most intriguing cross-format games we've studied in depth for quite some time. On the Xbox 360 at least, you can choose between sub-HD (1024x576) and a native rendering resolution of 1365x768. All you need to do is choose whether you want motion blur active or not.

The PlayStation 3 version of Tekken 6 on the other hand is sub-HD regardless, although you do get bonus anti-aliasing added if you forego the blur, and you don't get that on 360. The full ins and outs of this bizarre situation can be found in this earlier DF blog post, but suffice to say, Tekken 6 goes to show that in very, very rare cases, image quality isn't always just about the resolution. Tekken's additional texture filtering actually gives the sub-HD look on both platforms the edge over the 360 version when it's running in excess of 720p.

For the purposes of the face-off, we'll be sticking to the game's default graphical modes. That means it's motion blur all the way for the comparison video.

While the actual graphics and game content are basically identical across both platforms, Namco does deserve credit for acknowledging and making use of the additional storage offered by the Blu-ray disc format. A lot of the multi-platform releases we cover in the Face-Offs usually fit quite nicely onto a dual-layer DVD. Not so with Tekken 6: the game is a whopping great 20GB up against the more usual 6.7GB of the Xbox 360 dual-layer DVD. So, with an additional 13 gigs used up, where has it gone?

The answer is fairly obvious: Namco has provided two different encodings for its video content depending on the platform. The DVD gets less bandwidth for the video, and a correspondingly lower quality. More than that, on some of the videos (for example the Tekken timeline recap at the beginning of Scenario Mode), frame-rate has been upped from 30FPS on 360 up to 60FPS on PS3.

It's really nice to see some kind of acknowledgement for the storage capabilities of the Blu-ray disc, but it should be stressed that the differences are not hugely significant in the greater scheme of things. Increasing bandwidth on video encoding introduces a law of diminishing returns: doubling the bitrate doesn't double the quality. But regardless, having seen so many games appear in these features with inexplicably lower video quality on the PS3, seeing Namco take the time to make its impressive CG all that it can be is a refreshing change.

There's also another nice touch: similar to Namco's Soul Calibur IV and Ridge Racer 7, PS3 owners get the ability to install the crucial game data to hard disk to speed up loading times. Around 3GB of space is required, and while the install is optional, it's highly recommended because the loading times on both Xbox 360 and PS3 versions are something of a drag.

Gameplay-wise, as someone whose gaming career has encompassed every single Tekken released game to date, I have to admit that it's difficult to find much enthusiasm for what Namco has handed in here. Don't get me wrong - there's very little to choose between the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions, they're effectively as good as one another, but the palpable lack of innovation is beginning to grind.

The Tekken series used to be an accessible, special-effects fuelled alternative to the more po-faced, ultra-hardcore Virtua Fighter series, and for that we loved it. However, from Tekken 3 onwards the game's focus appears to have narrowed and narrowed - each sequel effectively a revised version of the last with very little in the way of progression, and new features that only the ultra-committed enthusiast is going to get excited about. The refinements and new elements are great for the series' long-time fans, but the actual gameplay itself hasn't really moved on that much. It feels old and moribund, even with the graphical facelift.

Soul Calibur IV managed to get away with the same approach with the inclusion of a powerful, fun character-generation system, but Tekken doesn't even have that, with a customisation system that is pretty limited in comparison. Instead, Tekken's approach has been to pave the way for cheap comeback KOs via the new Rage system. It's also "borrowed" the multi-level stages from Dead of Alive and, um, let you bounce your opponents off the floor for further juggle combos that you can do nothing about if you find yourself on the wrong end of them.

All of this, combined with the clumsy-to-play and graphically quite ugly Tekken Force element (aka Scenario mode) makes this something of a disappointing release. However, if you like the old-school Tekken approach to the fighting game, it's difficult to argue that you won't "get your kicks" from this one - it looks better, the additional fighters are actually new and interesting, all the characters are unlocked from the beginning, and in a genre so bereft of support from the major publishers, Tekken's arrival does feel oddly comforting.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Need for Speed: SHIFT on Xbox 360/PlayStation 3?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 187 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Retroid [mod]
02/11/09 @ 13:25
#1
+18
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Marquess of Queensberry rules, please, people.

:)
klem578
02/11/09 @ 13:30
#4
+32
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Captain scarlet : So, remind us why you're here exactly?
Don't like 'em ? Don't read 'em , simple as that mate...

For multi-platform owners these articles are pretty nice and informative regarding on which version you're going to spend your moolah.
gilroyneil
02/11/09 @ 13:32
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So non PS3 exclusives suck? Who knew? ;-)
mingster
02/11/09 @ 13:36
#6
+17
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
We want faceoffs for Dragon Age Origins and MW2 including PC version as it will probably be the winner.
Hypercube
02/11/09 @ 13:36
#7
+25
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@klem578 - I find there's two types of people who read these face-off articles. Those who want to read about platform differences and perhaps use the information to make a choice, and then there's the other type where it's all about making themselves look big (and, mostly, a bit stupid) on the internet.

It's usually self-evident which ones are which! ;)
Shinetop
02/11/09 @ 13:44
#9
+16
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So, Brütal Legend is Double Fine's first game? I wonder who made Psychonauts, then.
Moonprince
02/11/09 @ 13:46
#10
+7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Would be an idea to get pc in these too as given the choice between 360 and pc I'd like some reference...
siro
02/11/09 @ 13:50
#11
+13
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Moonprince: That doesn't make much sense, as on PC, it depends on the hardware provided and in game settings. Also, it will always look much better with the right hardware.
bad09
02/11/09 @ 13:52
#13
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm with Moonprince, now PC is my first choice on Multiplatform I'd really like to see how it shapes up against the console versions.

Although I suspect that might be difficult as there are so many different hardware options and varying performance results for PC.

Edit - Siro beat me to it!
Edited 1 times, most recently on 02/11/09 @ 13:53
Geordiemp
02/11/09 @ 13:55
#14
-10
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Only Brutal Legend is of any interest here for me, so toss a coin for xbox or ps3..

Nothing really AAA or interesting....

Note if GT can do 1080 P and 2 x MSAA at 60 FPS using SPU's, then its obvious the 2 other racing games here are optimised for PC. You would think EA and codemasters would be optimising for Xbox and Ps3 by now...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 02/11/09 @ 14:09
scorpius45
02/11/09 @ 14:00
#15
+9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
They should bring sound quality into these comparisons.
cianchristopher
02/11/09 @ 14:07
#16
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Very nice DF, very nice. Keep up the good work!

I've got OF:DR on PC, and I'll be buying most of my multiplatform games on PC from now on.

Looking forward to the Borderlands triple-face-off (hopefully Modern Warfare 2 will get one too!)
sparkymark75
02/11/09 @ 14:10
#17
+7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bit weird why they would lower the quality of the 360 image on Il-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey to match the PS3.
Whizzo
02/11/09 @ 14:15
#19
+7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the self-same champions of hardcore PC gaming are unlikely to find much to fault with in this particular first-person shooter

/splutters in amazement

Flashpoint is true to its roots

Ok now you're taking the piss, you are joking I assume?
Vertical Stand
02/11/09 @ 14:17
#20
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Whilst I've tried to overlook the faults of this largely below par HD generation of hardware (I'm increasingly of the belief that this cycle will age badly in the same way the first 3D consoles did) and the additional problems caused by Sony with the PS3, from the demo the tearing and frame rate issues in IL2 were off putting to the extent I'd rather wait and pick it up on PC at a later date.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 02/11/09 @ 14:18
Dr_Strange
02/11/09 @ 14:20
#21
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Maybe if developers started to write a PS3 engine from the ground up i.e. Heavy Rain, Uncharted, Killzone 2, etc then they would benefit from the system.

Porting game code to the PS3 doesn't work well, as we've seen all this gen. Developers should get off their lazy arse, after all, gamers are paying good money for these average games.
Gazza_UK
02/11/09 @ 14:21
#22
+20
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Really annoying as a ps3 (only) owner, when developers just don’t cut it when porting. I know the 360 will always have a slight advantage on the best of ports, but OP is just stupid, similar to the Orange Box a while back I guess.

Plus, you guys, who either take the piss, or overly protect the ps3, are just embarrassing. Everyone knows what ps3 exclusive titles can do, enjoy them rather than bitch about them.
GamerG
02/11/09 @ 14:22
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Once again proving if you want to see the best on multiplatform releases generally you need to go with the 360

Well done to MS for coming out with a console a whole year ahead of Sony and still matching it and even bettering it in terms of performance
Dr_Strange
02/11/09 @ 14:27
#24
+9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
GamerG
02/11/09 @ 14:22
Once again proving if you want to see the best on multiplatform releases generally you need to go with the 360

__________

No, you go with the PC. My PC versions of Mass Effect, Grid, Bioshock, L4D, FEAR 1/2, Dead Space, Orange Box, Pure, Burnout Paradise, Oblivion, etc, eat n' shit the 360's.
Dave52
02/11/09 @ 14:29
#25
+14
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So, kinda same old same old... I can't tell the difference between any of them with the exception of OF-DR. Conclusions to draw: PS3 is a bitch to code, but most developers are getting better at it.
SeesThroughAll
02/11/09 @ 14:31
#26
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's also "borrowed" the multi-level stages from Dead or Alive

While I agree that Tekken is not famous for innovation, this is factually wrong. Multi-level stages actually are coming back from Tekken 4. Nothing to do with Dead or Alive.
Tyrell
02/11/09 @ 14:32
#27
+9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Here's my take on it: I only buy console exclusives, for everthing else i buy on the PC.

I've got more titles for my PC, than my consoles.
Ashen-Shugar
02/11/09 @ 14:33
#28
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Maybe if developers started to write a PS3 engine from the ground up i.e. Heavy Rain, Uncharted, Killzone 2, etc then they would benefit from the system. "

Most developers do not have the budget, timescales, manpower, or insider hardware knowledge to extract decent performance from the PS3. In most cases it's simply not financially justifiable.
GamerG
02/11/09 @ 14:39
#29
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Dr_Strange

yer, if you dont want to put up with the hassle that is PC gaming
rare uk
02/11/09 @ 14:42
#30
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Was that Michael Jackson in Tekken? Looked like him
Dr_Strange
02/11/09 @ 14:43
#31
-5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ashen-Shugar
02/11/09 @ 14:33
Most developers do not have the budget, timescales, manpower, or insider hardware knowledge to extract decent performance from the PS3. In most cases it's simply not financially justifiable.

_________

OK, wait a minute, these developers are creating multiplatform games, therefore they would benefit in the long run of creating an engine (which they can upgrade, like Source) specifically for the PS3.

Yeah, it'll take money, but that's why they are creating multiplatform games in the first place.

UE 3, Source engine, etc, all suck on the PS3 because they weren't created with the PS3 in mind. They are specifically PC orientated, hence why games port to the 360 better.
Dr_Strange
02/11/09 @ 14:45
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
GamerG
02/11/09 @ 14:39
yer, if you dont want to put up with the hassle that is PC gaming

____

That's such a cliche reply, PC gaming has never been easier to set up. Your referring to the old 486 PC DOS days!
Moonprince
02/11/09 @ 14:49
#33
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
siro - Yeah, crossed my mind as I wrote it but having said that, majority people have a PC in some form and it wouldn't take much effort for Eurogamer to fix up a comparable PC to PS3 / 360 (surely the average cheap PC from shops meet / exceed that standard)??

Not that big a deal for me really, just a passing comment as given the choice, I usually go PC.
360_RROD
02/11/09 @ 14:50
#34
-10
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show

Most developers do not have the budget, timescales, manpower, or insider hardware knowledge to extract decent performance from the PS3. In most cases it's simply not financially justifiable.


Naughty Dog have a workforce of 85 and have built their own engine. PS3 development is seriously over-exaggerated.
Geordiemp
02/11/09 @ 14:53
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Most developers do not have the budget"

Chicken and egg, maybe if they put more effort into the titles, they would get more wolrd wide sales, and hence a bigger budget
jimboton
02/11/09 @ 14:54
#37
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I agree with posters above, this face offs should really be 360 vs PS3 vs Pc whenever possible.

Also, it would be great if you started taking input lag into account, that article DF did a while back on the subject was very promising..
muscleblade
02/11/09 @ 14:57
#38
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Tekken 6 and Brutal Legend isnt even availaible for PC.

I wouldnt dream of playing them on one even if they was.



GamerG
02/11/09 @ 15:00
#39
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Dr_Strange

No I am not, I'm talking about keeping on top of the latest hardware and having to play around with settings to get thrings running at a decent clip.

I have a dual core PC with a 4850 graphics card and I expected the performance to be in excess of my 3 year old 360 which i'm not entirley sure it is because games stutter and I see more screen tearing than I do on my 360. I reckon if he played around with the huge amount of settings on the games i'm sure I can make it better but I always end up powering the 360.

Tyrell
02/11/09 @ 15:01
#40
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show

Tekken 6 and Brutal Legend isnt even availaible for PC.

I wouldnt dream of playing them on one even if they was.


Ever heard of plugging a 360/PS3 pad or Arcade Stick into the PC. Nah, didn't think you have...
donnie080208
02/11/09 @ 15:12
#41
-9
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thankgod i didnt take a chance and buy operation flashpoint on the ps3,what is strange is that it uses the EGO engine which performed well on sonys system in the dirt2 comparrison. Tekken6 is about equal with both having good and bad sides BUT that face off does prove that BR is of little advantage this gen to INGAME visuals when a title based on ps3 arcade archeitecture is still sub HD.
Dr_Strange
02/11/09 @ 15:15
#42
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
GamerG
02/11/09 @ 15:00
@Dr_Strange

No I am not, I'm talking about keeping on top of the latest hardware and having to play around with settings to get thrings running at a decent clip.

I have a dual core PC with a 4850 graphics card and I expected the performance to be in excess of my 3 year old 360 which i'm not entirley sure it is because games stutter and I see more screen tearing than I do on my 360. I reckon if he played around with the huge amount of settings on the games i'm sure I can make it better but I always end up powering the 360.

_____________

You're lying! I''ve got a Q6600 cpu, with 4gb ram, and an 8800GT gpu, a modest card to say the least and running all my games at 1680x1050 with 60+ fps (with the exception of Crysis)

Yet, you're running a 4850 gpu (with a decent cpu, i don't know about your ram) far better card than mine, yet you say your struggling to get the same performance as your 360.

Man, you must think we were all born yesterday. I don't buy it mate. You've just made up a lot of bullshit and for those that know better will acknowledge it.
j-bo
02/11/09 @ 15:16
#43
-5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Geeez, what a dull and uninspiring bunch of games - it's amazing how given all the top notch games I am excited about, not even one of em featured here.
donnie080208
02/11/09 @ 15:18
#44
-7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Bit weird why they would lower the quality of the 360 image on Il-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey to match the PS3. " Sorry to say it, but it seems that it is the ps3 holding back the dev friendly xbox360 in multiplat games not the other way round as many foretold. How many other games has the 360 been slightly"downgraded" to make the ps3 look as equal? none?,loads? who knows,as it would be very bad publicity indeed
chessboxer
02/11/09 @ 15:21
#45
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ GamerG

Maybe the problem you're having is to do with Catalyst drivers rather than an actual hardware problem. Catalyst drivers are notoriously shit.
Tyrell
02/11/09 @ 15:21
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@donnie080208

Didn't i tell you in a thread last week to get back to school!
farticusmaximus
02/11/09 @ 15:22
#47
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is not a PC game thread, it's a 360/PS3 faceoff.

If you want to discuss PC gaming take it to a PC gaming thread.
donnie080208
02/11/09 @ 15:25
#48
-10
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@drstrange "Porting game code to the PS3 doesn't work well, as we've seen all this gen. Developers should get off their lazy arse, after all, gamers are paying good money for these average games. " Rubbish maybe sony should have made a console these "lazy" devs can program for, rather than throwing bits together that sound good on paper. Slightly mad,codemasters,valve etc.. have been responsinble for some of the best games going and because of sonys design arrogance ps3 owners are getting the short end of the stick. In the real world publishers want to make money and dont have infinite time and budgets. Its like making the fastest aeroplane in the world BUT no pilots in the world can fly it.(i.e. a waste of time)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 02/11/09 @ 17:45
Tyrell
02/11/09 @ 15:25
#49
-3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show

This is not a PC game thread, it's a 360/PS3 faceoff.

If you want to discuss PC gaming take it to a PC gaming thread.


This is a videogame site...don't start!
360_RROD
02/11/09 @ 15:27
#50
-5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@donnie080208

Yer as bright as a blackout! Sigh...

Comments: 1-50 of 187 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery