MS: XBLC games "poised to break out"
Into "proper money making territory".
Microsoft's Charlie Skilbeck believes Xbox Live Community Games are "poised to break out" and that we're turning the corner toward developers making real money on the channel.
"I'm fairly sure nobody has made a million bucks yet, but I'm fairly certain it's only a matter of time," Skilbeck, a developer account manager, told a Develop Conference audience during his Community Games for Fun and Profit talk today.
"We're getting to the point now where we can see a momentum behind the platform that we think is definitely going to catapult it into proper money-making territory. We know there are multiple games that have made a profit already."
One of those games that hasn't, however, is Clover, whose maker Daniel Jones is an outspoken critic on the "financial validity" and "woeful marketing" of the Community Games - now Indie Games - service.
"Those guys," Skilbeck added, addressing Tank Strike maker Daniel Steger as well, "I understand they're upset, they've made a lot of effort and it hasn't done what they expected. But I know it has exceeded expectations for others."
Skilbeck said he felt that, like the iPhone App Store, the Indie Games channel is getting over the initial wave of "junk" and apps that come with running an "unmanaged portfolio". Quality projects are close, he said, claiming that he knows "plenty" of multi-month, multi-man projects in development right now.
"We can expect the quality bar to start rising rapidly," boasted Skilbeck. "It's definitely poised to break out."
Apparently over one million people have downloaded the XNA Game Studio tools and the graph of submissions is "rising rapidly". "It's getting real traction now," said Skilbeck, who announced that 338 games are approved for download today. And that number, he added, is likely to grow "substantially".
Skilbeck wouldn't bet on a timeframe for us to see these "commercially viable" projects from more ambitious teams, however.
Another criticism levelled at the Indie Games channel has been exposure for the games. Skilbeck isn't aware of any changes being made to the dashboard to address this, but reckons the soon-to-be-implemented community ratings will help dramatically.
"What we're going to see is the community rating feature make a big difference. We expect that to change the game completely, in terms of being able to find the gooduns. That's the problem, right? With the community ranking feature I think we're just going to suddenly see the real gooduns become really visible."
Migrating to Xbox Live Arcade is another possibility, but to do this a game must have a publisher. Going it alone is "not happening any time soon", and there are added costs to doing so. But if that is the goal, then the Indie Games channel can be used as an effective prototyping tool.
"This is an extremely cheap way to prototype ideas," said Skilbeck, who reckoned a day or two was all one would need to produce a "simple", working project. And, he added, "A really good community game will trump any CV."
Skilbeck wasn't sure about developing and selling solely for PC using XNA, and suggested focusing on Xbox 360 as early as possible in the development cycle. You'll need a premium version of the XNA Game Studio to do so, however, plus a retail Xbox 360 to play your game on. Still, the combined cost of this shouldn't be more than 200 quid.
The Game Studio recently also updated to version 3.1, adding Avatar and Xbox Live Party support - an anticipated feature Skilbeck said will arrive on Xbox 360 with the next dash update, whenever that is.
Natal, too, will eventually be supported, although Skilbeck explained there is a "lag" between feature release and XNA support - Avatars being a case in point.
You may also like...
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
Face-Off: The Darkness 2
-
App of the Day: Sir Benfro's Brilliant Balloon
-
Sony admits "dropping the ball" with Demon's Souls
-
Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Vita Review
-
CD Projekt: Witcher 2 intro cinematic "the most expensive asset we ever created"
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
Grand Slam Tennis 2 Review
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 performance tip: make a new manual save
-
One Piece: Unlimited Cruise SP Review
-
Gotham City Impostors Review
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Review
-
Mass Effect 3 FemShep trailer debuts
-
The Darkness 2 Review
-
Valve admits hackers accessed Steam transaction log
-
Epic's Sweeney on graphics tech: "the limit really is in sight"
-
Double Fine Adventure passes Day of the Tentacle budget
-
Next Xbox has tablet-like touch-screen controller - rumour
-
Sony: The Last Guardian is making "slow progress"
-
App of the Day: Superman
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 now live for Xbox 360
-
EA announces starry Syndicate voice cast
-
Blizzard legally opposes Valve's Dota trademark application
-
King Arthur 2 Review









Comments (13) Latest comment 3 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
As opposed to "not actually making money"?
This will always be a difficult balance. The more open a distribution system is, the more tat there will be on it and the harder it will be to find the good stuff. Does XBLC even have a rating system? MS need to start developing systems that will float the quality stuff to the top, then maybe it will become a viable starting point for a small developer to make money.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yes because working on your own to create a simple game is a great indicator of an individual's ability to work as part of, and contribute to the large teams required in modern game development . .
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Strawman. A good community game doesn't demonstrate the LACK of ability to work in a team, any more than doing bugger all does. But producing a community game demonstrates a certain amount of self motivation and self organisation, which an employer WILL be interested in.
And contributing to a large team varies in importance depending what your job is. Some people can be very good at completing the tasks farmed out to them to a high standard, without ever really getting involved in team discussion and problem solving. It just depends what their job is.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
So if - for example - you were interviewing two guys for a job in a development studio. And Guy A had a published game on XBLC that he made in his bedroom whilst working part-time in a factory. And Guy B had nothing but a glowing CV full of experience working in a team... You'd actually pick Guy B?
Seriously?
Having a game at all, even just a demo or proof of concept, is surely better than any written CV and would be an advantage over anybody that didn't have one. That it could be endorsed by MS is even better.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
They won't be making any money from me.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
[Edit - Apparently I can't spell.]
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I would choose the guy with the best suit
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Even Wikipedia page doesn't tell anything about it's availability.
So, release it first, break out then...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Well to be honest, the industry is so small that I will usually ask people who have worked with the glowing CV guy and if they rate him then we'll take him on. It's not that creating games isn't an achievement, but normally we are looking to recruit a specialist in a certain area with proven experience in that role. Obviously if looking to scale up a team with more generalists/lower level guys over a greater time frame then I'd consider an enthusiast for sure.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm also interested that Natal will have eventual support. I know it's a while off but I'm curious on how they will handle the Natal interface.