WOW to add 1m more subs - analyst
WAR won't have "a negative impact".
Lazard analyst Colin Sebastian reckons World of Warcraft can add another million subscribers to its total of 10.9 million in the next year, and that it will shrug off competition from Warhammer Online.
"We expect a net addition of 1 million new subscribers to World of Warcraft over the next 12 months, driven in part by the launch of the [Wrath of the Lich King] expansion pack, as well as by ongoing growth of the game in China," Sebastian said (as reported by Edge Online).
He recognised Warhammer Online's achievement in recruiting 750,000 players, but reckons it won't dent the progress of the Blizzard juggernaut.
"We do not expect [Warhammer Online to have] a significant negative impact in the near-term on World of Warcraft - and note that preorders of the upcoming [WOW] expansion pack rank as one of the best selling games on Amazon.com and other retail websites," Sebastian said.
He advised investors to buy Activision Blizzard stock after being impressed by last weekend's BlizzCon event, where, he said, he couldn't find anyone interested in WAR. Funny, that.
In other words, he went to a convention, talked to fanboys, and did some internet shopping as research. No wonder the financial world is in collapse.
Can WOW forge on to 12 million subscribers? Will WAR's superior PVP game steal players away? Commence your trolling in the comments, but remember - there's every possibility that both those things might happen.
You may also like...
-
Glorious Technicolor 49
-
GeForce GRID: Can Cloud Gaming Match Console Performance? 41
-
Day Z: The Best Zombie Game Ever Made? 132
-
Game of the Week: Ghost Recon Future Soldier 24
-
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review 132
-
App of the Day: Penny Time 9
-
Gravity Rush Review 69
-
Dragon's Dogma Review 140
-
New Star Wars franchise to be unveiled next week 122
-
Diablo 3 Review 245
-
Rockstar to push Max Payne 3 "to its limits" on high-end PCs 63
-
Sony patents method to interrupt your gaming with an ad 171
-
Wii U Aliens: Colonial Marines is best-looking version because of console's "more modern tech" 117
-
How The Elder Scrolls Online hopes to avoid repeating Skyrim bug fiasco 39
-
Dirt Showdown Review 89
Comments (24) Latest comment 4 years ago
Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I've got both WoW and WAR and they both get equal love!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
750000 was the number of purchases of boxed copies. Even if there's 50% update, that's only 375000 subscribers.
Saying that, that is just in English in the USA and Europe. WoW runs French, German, Spanish, Russian and Chinese servers so it's hard to compare the figures.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Anywho yea WotLK will steal players back out of couriosity HOWEVER no one is thinking long term properly - whos to say players wont steam thru the content 'firsting' everything and then come 2-3 months down the line leave WoW yet again as 'there is no content' ala TBC again?
WoW didn't gain '11 million' overnight and it sure as hell wont lose that number overnight either, same can be said about WAR you only get mass exiduses when a game doesn't deliver and is very poor quality, neither game is such, both games are soild if you view them as length of exsistance (ie WAR for a month old game is great qualitly compeared to the first months of things like TR, Vanguard, AoC etc etc)..
If anyone could hazard a guess what will happen over this next year WoW will gain it's '12 million' then drop to 10 over 4-5 months and WAR is going to slowly gain users as it opens up in the world and possily hit about 3 million come 2010.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I am a blizzard fan, so I have no interest in playing anything that does not have the blizzard logo attached to it.
….see my point. Blizzcon is for Blizzard fans. Asking ppl if they are considering playing Warhammer at a Blizzard fan convention is not good research in my book.
As I said, I am a Blizzard fanboy and I have paid 70euro to go to the WWI. Do you really think I have any intention to play an MMO of a competitor?
…plain stupid
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Will this EG journalist's bias be made more transparent?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Anywho yea WotLK will steal players back out of couriosity HOWEVER no one is thinking long term properly
A proposterous assertion; WotLK will retain players who buy it for precisely the reason that people play WoW in the first place: they enjoy it. Many of the changes in WotLK have been made to make the game more approachable and fun for demographics on the fringes of their subscriber base (or not, dependent on your view of casual players). These changes are not simply for show; they're intended to make the game more fun in the long term.
As I said, I am a Blizzard fanboy and I have paid 70euro to go to the WWI. Do you really think I have any intention to play an MMO of a competitor?
I went to WWI. I have played other MMOs. I will, presumably, play other MMOs. The reason I'm choosing not to, however, isn't because of some ridiculous concept of loyalty to Blizzard. The reason is simple: theirs is the best MMO out there at the moment.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Will this EG journalist's bias be made more transparent?
----
My left and right buttocks' PVP game is superior to WoW's. Seriously, PvP is something WoW doesn't do well at all. The PvE stuff, quests, crafting, it's all good. But PvP is very much the poor relation in WoW.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'll probably go back to warcraft for the new expansion and if I like it then WAR gets the back foot and no sub.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Was gonna quote this out as well. It's certainly arguable. WoW has much better combat, more balanced classes, proven battlegrounds and world content, and dedicated arena tournaments.
Of course I'm playing devils advocate, but WAR still has a lot to prove.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think WaR can coexist. The PvP I have experienced is quite accesable and means you can dip back in for it whilst still playing WoW. I have taken the plunge and gone for a 6 monther on it. However I do find (like Lotr online) that it is hard to play for more then an hour at a time, whereas on WoW I can play for rather longer without headaches etc.
But for me WaR will not replace WoW, but has replaced LOTR as my second mmo.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
…plain stupid"
Yes. That is plain stupid. If it's a good game then it's a good game. That's why I'm going to play it.
Not just that, but don't forget where Warcraft got half it's ideas from in the first place
But yeah. Be a fanboy dumbass and dismiss a perfectly good game just because it's from a different franchise. The world'll miss you.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
i dont remember wow starting with 10 million subs, do you?
any way, you cant spell analyst without fucking wanker
Comment below viewing threshold Show
ROFL...
As a 3 year long WoW player I have always thought that WoW PvP is a total joke (yes and I did PvP a lot from time to time). It is broken by design and will never work. WoW combat engine is a PvE engine.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Bottom line is WoW and WAR are like Pepsi and Coke, same idea but different ways of making it.. There isn't really a 'better' it's more of 'preffered'.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
HOLY SHIT. You found a journalist with an OPINION?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
WAR's issue is, that whilst it has superior world PvP and battlegrounds/scenarios as current, that's the exact thing Blizzard are focusing on in WOTLK, having completely neglected them throughout TBC.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It just seems a bit strange to me to do research at a fan-convention.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Three whole years and £350 of laughing at how shit it is eh?