Advertisement
Wiseman wants to film Gears trilogy News
Xbox 360 PC News by Robert Purchese
Die Hard 4.0 director Len Wiseman plans to turn Gears of War into a film trilogy.
He confirmed his role at the helm during a red carpet chat with website Bloody-Disgusting, and shed some light on his masterplan for the IP.
"The hope is that we're wanting to do three movies and really cover the bases on everything. Basically a harder edged Lord Of The Rings," said Wiseman.
"It's going to be much more [on the] science fiction side of it than the creature side of it. I've always been much more of a sci-fi action fan than a horror fan."
Apparently Wiseman began looking into Gears of War after picking the shooter to appear during a scene of Die Hard 4.0.
"I just really connected with it; the design of it the world, the whole thing," added Wiseman. "So I actually bought an Xbox 360 to start researching what it was."
Pirates of the Caribbean and Collateral writer Stuart Beattie will be doing the script, and the whole project will be overseen by Gears of War creative director Cliff Bleszinski.
Legendary Pictures, of 300 and The Watchmen credit, has stumped up half the cash for the project, and production company Temple Hill Entertainment reckons a launch next year is likely.
No Hollywood actors or actresses have been linked with the project. Maybe Bruce Willis will join in.
Advertisement
Are you excited about Gears of War 2 on Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games
Thanks!
Related Games
Gears of War
Gears of War 2
Latest Features
-
Gears of War Interview [104]
-
Gears of War Interview [27]
-
Gears of War Review [235]
-
Gears of War Review [815]
-
Gears of War First Impressions [125]
Latest Videos
Gears of War - Top 5 achievements [3] 21 October, 2008
Latest News
-
Next Gears may be on next-gen consoles [54]
-
Epic expects photo-realism in a decade [56]
-
The Rock to play Fenix in Gears film? [65]
-
Gears film "looking incredibly good" [43]
-
Epic reveals 10-year plan for Gears [117]
Latest Screenshots
3 May, 2007 [4]
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Poster
|
0
The games have an adequate story at best (heck, the original can be played without factoring in the plot at all) so a movie based on it sounds like a rather stupid idea.
If movie-makers must insist on making videogame movies then they should - at least - use better source material than Gears of War. Half-Life, for one, destroys every single aspect of Gears of War from a plot perspective. |
|
Doctor_What
26/01/09 @ 14:38
0
"I actually bought an Xbox 360 to start researching what it was." This wasn't the first thing that he did?
Then again, ignoring the game's story might be the best idea... |
|
muscleblade
26/01/09 @ 14:43
0
"A Gears film based around another squad might be not bad, as long as he doesn't just retread what Gears story there is - I don't want Fenix in it at all. "
Exactly how they should do it. Different cast and maybe even different timeline could rescue the film and not ruining the game franchise. |
|
PearOfAnguish
26/01/09 @ 14:50
0
"I wonder if the film will be laggy like the game!"
It won't be viewable in cinema screens using Sony technology. |
|
Unclebenny
26/01/09 @ 14:54
0
The fact that gears gets all it plot points into a few seconds of expoisiton during short cutscenes does not for a good film make. I was very dissapointed that after all the talk of gears 2 having a deeper story about Doms wife, all this lead to was a very short interlude in the main quest when they go off to try find her. Gears story telling is poor at best and I found it confusing at worst.
Lets make a film of sonic the hedgehog. It could be la biopic charting his rise to fame and steep fall into normal life because he spends all his money on a gang of cronies who follow him round ruining his projects after that. Eventually all the drugs turn him into a werehog... or something. |
|
PearOfAnguish
26/01/09 @ 14:58
0
Maybe it'll be about a group of very short, hairy soldiers who walk a long way to throw a bit of jewellery into a volcano
|
|
0
Ha ha. Let's compare:
The Lord of the Rings - Huge bloody book that can't be completely squeezed into 3 films running to almost 10 hours (extended edition). Gears of War - Computer games with a couple of minutes of exposition Hmm, an apples and oranges comparison anyone?
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 26/01/09 @ 15:09
|
|
0
I would vote for a half life movie too. We all know what gordon freeman looks like and the sinister grey suited council would make a great mystery villain. Heck I still don't know what they want even though episode three is on the horizon. All we do know is that Grodon is somehow special enough to them that they don't seem to want him dead. At the same time they couldn't give a flying fig about anyone else.
The gears movie would only work in a hamburger hill, killing fields kind of way and not an epic LOTR way. There is no equivalent ring quest. We can assume that either the locust are emulsion mutated humans or were around before man arrived and are actually fighting for their home world. It's also now implied that the emulsion is actually a living sentient entity that is itself fighting for survival against those that are using it as a power source! seriously. The gears plot is way too supid and vague to make a movie out of it. |
|
0
"The Lord of the Rings - Huge bloody book that can't be completely squeezed into 3 films running to almost 10 hours (extended edition). "
True.. but 90% of LotR is Hobbits singing ;) "We can assume that either the locust are emulsion mutated humans or were around before man arrived and are actually fighting for their home world. It's also now implied that the emulsion is actually a living sentient entity that is itself fighting for survival against those that are using it as a power source! seriously. The gears plot is way too supid and vague to make a movie out of it. " Sounds like about 90% of the Japanese animation plots. Evangelion anybody?
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 26/01/09 @ 15:15
|
|
0
I assumed that Gears was in Die Hard as a sponshorship deal - especially as when Brucey first rescues the kid playing the game in is done as a Gears style shoot-out. Lock to cover - pop out aimed shots - dive to new cover point - blind fire - grenade - roadie run - repeat etc..
The only thing missing was chainsaws and active reload! Also - LOTR seems an odd comparison, but hey - may as well compare to something well known even if it is rubbish |
|
Slabbathepave
26/01/09 @ 15:17
0
The whole thing is fucking stupid. Every aspect of it, from every angle conceievable and covering every sentient being involved. Fucking stupid.
Gears of War 2 made me laugh...laugh hard. Fun game (if a little OTT) but for gods sake do not try and give these Unreal Tournament skins character depth....i mean for gods sake what kind of fucking retard takes Gears seriously on any level? I refuse to accept the irony because it wasnt intended, therefor its fucking stupid. Gears is stupid. If you treat it as anything else....your stupid. Stupid. |
|
TLKCydonia
26/01/09 @ 15:25
0
Sounds good. I think people who were expecting a Gears movie to be a deep, thoughtful film full of exposition were just barking up the wrong tree. Any Gears film was always going to be a plot-light action blockbuster, and expecting anything else would just be foolish IMO.
But anyway - yay. |
|
GrumpyLlama
26/01/09 @ 15:43
0
Why are all movies based on games crap? Simple almost without exception the plots of games a crap. The only game that has impressed me with plot or characterisation recently was Portal. If you want interaction play a game. If you want a good plot read a book. I doubt there will ever be a Citizen Kane of games as the plots in modern games a just an excuse to shoot things in the head over and over again.
|
|
kangarootoo
26/01/09 @ 15:46
0
@Crofto
"The games have an adequate story at best (heck, the original can be played without factoring in the plot at all) so a movie based on it sounds like a rather stupid idea" Yeah, 'cos an action film without a plot is like a fish without a bicycle, right? ;) "and the whole project will be overseen by Gears of War creative director Cliff Bleszinski" Ah |
|
kangarootoo
26/01/09 @ 15:48
0
As a point of reference, I quite liked Diehard 4.0, but the plit was proper nonsense.
|
|
bodypopper
26/01/09 @ 15:52
0
I agree Half Life would be a better movie. Gordon not talking doesn't matter - it means no one can disappointed as long as it's a decent actor with a beard and glasses. Ed Norton or Ryan Reynolds would be great in the role I reckon.
Gears is a lot fun to play but as a move it would play like a homerotic Top Gun tribute. With added aliens and gore.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 26/01/09 @ 15:54
|
|
GrumpyLlama
26/01/09 @ 16:01
0
The plot in Halflife is laughable. Okay for a game, but bad even for an 80s B movie. Neighbours has better storylines and more emotional impact. Maybe it is because games a traditionally targeted at young males.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 26/01/09 @ 16:02
|
|
captainrentboy
26/01/09 @ 16:21
0
I think it'll be good, I'm not asking for facking Casablanca 2 here, I want rediculous OTT action sequences, blood and gore galore, a few laughs and fannytastic special effects. I think Wiseman is more than capable of bringing the goods. Die Hard 4 isn't that bad and I'm not sure why it's sooo hated, the action is inventive and as long as you've got the 2 disc dvd it's still full of the same ole McClane wisecracks. I mean the series was going downhill right from the off, I don't think numero 3 stood the test of time particularly well.
And Len's Underworld films, well, y'know, they ermmmm, had Beckinsale in leather looking hot as a mother fucker! :)
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 26/01/09 @ 16:21
|
|
0
Praise for the Die Hard 4.0 movie just shows that you can find anyone who will like any movie, especially if you've got an established fanbase. Hell, I know someone who thought the new Indiana Jones was pretty good, and a couple of people who really enjoyed Don't Mess With The Zohan.
No offence meant to captainrentboy and kangarootoo of course, we all have different tastes :) |
|
0
FORGET ABOUT FREEMAN!
(Anyone remember their blood starting to pump as they heard that and the music started? Brilliant moment) I thought Half Life's subtle background-storytelling was done really well, only really bested by Half Life 2 (other than in games which massively use storyline, such as Planescape: Torment). It compares very favourably to the crap that is much modern fiction. |
|
0
I think people are possibly forgetting a much greater argument to be had here...
Who would you have cast as Marcus Phoenix? On the one hand I'd love to see someone like Bruce Willis, even though he doesn't really fit the age range. Tbh I'm only thinking of him because someone mentioned Die Hard. I think John Cena would hit the character right on the head (would need a slightly gruffier voice though). |
|
ShogunAssassin
26/01/09 @ 16:52
0
I imagine it being a lot like 300, with the blue screen background graphics. Actually, 300 is quite an adequate comparison to make, since that movie, while being pretty good, brainless fun, didn´t have much of a plot and also starred big, homoerotic wrestlers pouring gallons of blood.
I´m not expecting greatness here, but if done properly, this could actually be decent. I´m actually looking forward to this movie, at least out of curiosity.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 26/01/09 @ 16:52
|
|
kangarootoo
26/01/09 @ 17:03
0
@skillian
I have absolutely no plans to watch the Zohan movie. I did however enjoy the new Indy film (it wasn't great, but I wasn't bored). I like swashbuckling as much as I like monster B movies, as much as I like Pans Labyrinth. I liked Die Hard 4.0 because it had good action cg heavy scenes, and therefore provided what I expected from a Die Hard film. Its not in my top ten mind, and I don't consider myself to be in the core fanbase of either film :) |
|
Thunderbolt!
26/01/09 @ 17:14
0
Zohan and the Love Guru are tied for my worst movies of 2008.
And whats all the praise for the Half-Life storyline, did I miss something or had I just seen it done much better on the X-Files? |
|
0
@kanga
Indeed mate, everyone has their own thing. I'm a huge fan of Spider-Man 3 and Alien Resurrection which were both pretty much universally panned, plus I didn't actually think The Dark Knight was that impressive, despite loving Batman Begins. There's loads of other examples too of course.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 26/01/09 @ 17:19
|
|
0
Gears of War is probably a better basis for a film than Half Life. Half Life had a very basic plot, clunky and cliched by film standards. What set it apart was that it set a new standard for story telling within games, the actual story iself was fairly ropey.
Gears of War has a (reasonably) original setting and the games at least hint at a history and back story. As run and gun action games, they don't (and probably shouldn't) spend too much time on the plot. The quality of any films based on the franchise is down the script writer and director. Wiseman's original Bourne film was very good, but only took the ghost of a premise from Ludlum's novel. However, it benefitted from not sticking too closely to the source material. However, the Gears movie will no doubt be panned by critics if cleaves to the plot of the game or abused by fans for deviating from it. :o) |
|
0
Just reunite the cast of Armageddon. Easy.
If this was ludicrously bombastic and 18 Rated I'd watch it. The trouble is, Hollywood seems to have lost the knack. They don't make films as preposterously entertaining as Con Air any more. They make - and this is apt - Die Hard 4. A weak, comedy/fantasy addition to the series, as far as I'm concerned. This'll have no physical effects, no real strain of wit (the comedy, I'm assuming, will be as misfiring as it is in the games) and it'll just look exactly like Doom. Though Wiseman will probably opt for some Saving Private Ryan-esque documentary shaky-cam just to irritate everyone in the cinema and obscure the violence sufficiently to make it a fun-loving, family friendly 15. And Vin Diesel will be Marcus Phoenix. I don't think they will even consider making a Gears film without Marcus. |
|
patchbox360
26/01/09 @ 18:26
0
ahh those street fighter adverts to the side, ahh street fighter 4 - i cannot wait!
|
|
0
@Crofto
The games have an adequate story at best (heck, the original can be played without factoring in the plot at all) so a movie based on it sounds like a rather stupid idea You haven't seen many action movies I take it? :) In very broad terms the plot is similar to Lord of the Rings both can be summed up as: a massively powerful evil menace threatens to wipe out everyone, no quarter will be given, no mercy will be shown, it's up to a bunch of heroes to sort it all and save everything by delivering a macguffin to the heart of the enemy's territory. It's the spectacle they want, the sheer scale of catastrophe and what's at stake. Regardless of whether or not you think the plot in the games is good enough with a good cast and good script it could be good. Mind you, I wouldn't take any bets on it actually being good. :) @bodypopper Gears is a lot fun to play but as a move it would play like a homerotic Top Gun tribute. Well, Top Gun itself had some pretty strong homoerotic elements, so I think that'd be this would be a pretty amazingly gay movie. ;) |
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
