WiiWare threshold is misinterpreted - dev
"Sounds a lot more evil than it is."
An anonymous developer has confirmed to Eurogamer that a WiiWare sales threshold - below which a studio makes no money - exists, but says it has been misinterpreted by the press.
"I'm concerned this recent threshold news is generating an artificially negative wave of press. The spirit of the threshold was never to screw the developer - it was, as far as I can tell, a quality control mechanism to prevent the service from getting overrun with a bunch of crappy games," the source told us.
"Once the threshold is crossed, the developer is retroactively paid for every single unit sold below the threshold. I know there has been confusion on that point in the past."
The threshold, according to a freshly-published report by Kotaku, is 6000 copies for a game bigger than 16MB in North America. Smaller games need to sell 4000 units. In Europe the bar is halved, as bigger games need to top 3000 copies and smaller games need to break the 2000 mark.
The report claims WiiWare titles have two years to reach their target. If successful, Nintendo gives the developer 65 per cent of the money made.
"From the stats I've seen and heard developers report, the threshold is easily surpassed within the first day, or at least the first week, for many games," the source explained.
"I hear rumours within the dev community that Nintendo recognises a problem here, where occasionally an entirely legitimate game just doesn't make it, and is looking for a way to make exceptions, to ensure small devs are paid even if the threshold is not reached. Just rumours though, so who knows.
"I just fear this is one of those things that sounds a lot more evil than it actually is," added the source.
Nintendo has refused to comment on the existence of the WiiWare sales threshold, telling us anything that goes on between itself and developers is "private and confidential".
You may also like...
-
Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Vita Review
-
Sony admits "dropping the ball" with Demon's Souls
-
Grand Slam Tennis 2 Review
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 performance tip: make a new manual save
-
One Piece: Unlimited Cruise SP Review
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
App of the Day: Superman
-
Next Xbox has tablet-like touch-screen controller - rumour
-
Gotham City Impostors Review
-
Mass Effect 3 FemShep trailer debuts
-
CD Projekt: Witcher 2 intro cinematic "the most expensive asset we ever created"
-
Valve admits hackers accessed Steam transaction log
-
Epic's Sweeney on graphics tech: "the limit really is in sight"
-
Sony: The Last Guardian is making "slow progress"
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 now live for Xbox 360
-
Blizzard legally opposes Valve's Dota trademark application
-
Double Fine Adventure passes Day of the Tentacle budget
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Review
-
EA announces starry Syndicate voice cast
-
The Darkness 2 Review
-
David Braben discusses consumer Raspberry Pi release
-
Sony confirms LittleBigPlanet Karting development
-
Amnesia: The Dark Descent follow-up teased
-
Namco Bandai to publish new Star Trek title
-
Sony showcases Vita's Discovery Apps









Comments (14) Latest comment 3 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Shame it hasn't worked.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Suddenly the choice of Steam for indie games such as The Path makes more sense.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm all for the strategy that got the PSone into the market - flood it with anything and everything! A low threshold should discourage real garbage at least, without making Wiiware seem like a bad option. There's some nice stuff on there, as well as some drivel. I'm fine with drivel though, as long as I can avoid it and get the good stuff
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
That one statement about quality control kind of killed that devs argument there and then. Everything he\she\it said after that was null and void.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Madness
Comment below viewing threshold Show
if developers cared, they wouldnt put games out on it would they?
Seems to me the only moaning thats going on is by the forumites who it doesnt effect anyhow!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
with the split being a very favourable one of 65/35, then if as a developer you were worried about sales and getting paid, you would break even by buying 65% of the required amount
if you have to buy less then you're into profit (though obviously you have to decide if spending the time and capital on buying all those games is going to be worth it)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show