Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Why Activision dumped Sierra's games News

PC PlayStation 2 PSP DS Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 Wii
News by Robert Purchese

6 November, 2008

Activision Blizzard boss Bobby Kotick has explained that various Sierra (Vivendi) games were dumped for not exhibiting "potential to be exploited every year across every platform".

Among those dropped during the Vivendi-Activision merger were Brutal Legend, Ghostbusters and 50 Cent: Blood on the Sand. Fortunately, other publishers are pecking at the remains; Atari looks poised to publish Ghostbusters and THQ will do the honours with 50 Cent.

"Why don't we start with the Vivendi Games businesses: there were a lot of different projects and businesses that we identified as not likely to achieve the profit margin potential that we look for," Kotick told investors in a financial call, painstakingly transcribed on Seeking Alpha.

"With respect to the franchises that don't have the potential to be exploited every year across every platform with clear sequel potential that can meet our objectives of over time becoming USD 100 million plus franchises, that's a strategy that has worked very well for us."

The plan is to work on titles that will still in the public eye 10 years from now. And to achieve this, Activision Blizzard has a whopping 15 properties across 70 SKUs planned for 2009 - 40 per cent more than in 2008.

Kotick said these will include new titles in the Call of Duty and Guitar Hero series, as well as film tie-ins Transformers, Wolverine, Monsters Versus Aliens and Ice Age.

There's a Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2 on the way; more James Bond and Tony Hawk outings; and the eventual release of Wolfenstein.

But Kotick also has plans for "three, maybe four exciting new intellectual properties", including Prototype, Singularity and the racing game from PGR brain-box Bizarre Creations.

Guitar Hero will naturally play a key part for Activision, too, and bigwig Mike Griffith is boisterous about the Christmas potential of Guitar Hero World Tour.

"Our retail checks indicate that the Guitar Hero World Tour band kit is outselling its only competitor by a very wide margin," said Griffith.

"The band kit launch quantities are virtually sold out across the channel and even with our manufacturers at full capacity and a continuous flow of supply throughout the quarter, we are likely to not be able to keep up with demand for the band kits this holiday."

Griffith expects rather a lot of money to be made from downloadable songs as well, with more than 25 million tracks gobbled up by fans so far. He also mentioned the possibility of selling these songs "on a subscription basis", but said little more on the matter.

Head over to our Guitar Hero World Tour review to see what all the fuss is about.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Call of Duty: World at War on PlayStation 2?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 59 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Eraysor
06/11/08 @ 13:49
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Activision is the new EA.
PearOfAnguish
06/11/08 @ 13:49
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Translation: if it's not Warcraft we don't give a fuck.


Let's have SWAT 5, ta.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 06/11/08 @ 13:49
retr0gamer
06/11/08 @ 13:50
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Get rid of the interesting projects and focus on the generic tripe and licenses?
bitesize
06/11/08 @ 13:50
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
hmmmm, out of the 3 mentioned that they've dropped, i'd have probably bought 2. of the stuff mentioned that they are publishing, none have any interest for me at all. i guess i'm not really in the actiblizz target mrket then...

the_dudefather
06/11/08 @ 13:51
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Brutal Legend: Aerosmith edition world tour 2009
kangarootoo
06/11/08 @ 13:55
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You can't really blame them. Everyone has a job to do, and some people are employed to look at how best to make money for the company. Those people need to be part of the deal, or people would go out of business too easily for taking their eye off the money.

Its sad I know, but games companies have to make money or they can't make games. How much money they want to make is I guess a relative thing, but it always seems a bit hollow when people comment negatively about how Activision aren't focussed on creating art, when if they were in a position to take the cash instead of the artistic kudos most of them would.
CJF
06/11/08 @ 13:59
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
More specifically, they've just mentioned 4 new IPs that they've got planned. Don't really see what people can complain about...
JonFE
06/11/08 @ 14:03
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Suddenly the *real* reason to split StarCraft II into three separate packages one for each faction is revealed :-P
cyacomini
06/11/08 @ 14:04
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yipee - another Transformers game. Just what I always wanted...



/sarcasm off

Vertical Stand
06/11/08 @ 14:06
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Activision suck of course but its very telling about the state of the industry that Brutal Legend, by far the most interesting of those three has yet to be picked up by anyone...

Edit: @cyacomini yeah Transformers title for PS2 (the good one from down under) will never be beaten, quality game.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 06/11/08 @ 14:07
Eighthours
06/11/08 @ 14:07
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah, because Ghostbusters has never made any money!
Fab4
06/11/08 @ 14:09
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
CoD:WaW becomes all too clear now.
miiiguel
06/11/08 @ 14:11
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Activision was one of the biggest McCain donators, it surely tells something about their views. Not judging, though. Shit is what it is.
PlugMonkey
06/11/08 @ 14:12
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Interesting. Really looking forward to Ghostbusters and Brutal Legend (assuming it ever sees the light of day). Frankly couldn't give a fuck about Transformers, Wolverine, Monsters Versus Aliens or Ice Age.
Mogs
06/11/08 @ 14:15
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Shut up kangarootoo you bellend. It's like saying "You can't blame Saddam for slaughtering his own people, he's a dictator and has to rule with an iron fist. He's not out to please his people, he has to maintain control and order by any means necessary!". And before you start reeling with the predictable "Oh of course because selling games is so like killing people" retort, yes the comparison is WHOLELY valid.
Thunderbolt!
06/11/08 @ 14:16
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
miiiguel,

Come on mate your just stirring the pot now!

Whereas Brutal Legend looked fun it will be a pity if it doesnt find a publisher.

The soundtrack and voice actor are awesome
Dan234
06/11/08 @ 14:16
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"potential to be exploited every year across every platform"

You heard that. If it's not Madden (last two digits of current year), FIFA (last two digits of current year), or Guitar Hero: (band for this year) then it's out.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 06/11/08 @ 14:16
Toothball
06/11/08 @ 14:16
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh dear, it seems the future is nothing but sequels.
Weezer
06/11/08 @ 14:18
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mogs - what the fuck are you on? Making commercial decisions = killing innocent civilians?

er...
miiiguel
06/11/08 @ 14:21
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Thunderbolt! : I don't know what that expression means... (shame)

@ Mogs: That analogy is wrong in so many ways..., man. What do you want? Nationalize Activison? - it's their money, their proprety. Are you a bolchevique now? Outrageous.
Mogs
06/11/08 @ 14:23
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How tedious Weezer. The point is that "Oh it's the nature of the beast" is not an excuse or a defense for bogus actions or practices.
ps3owner
06/11/08 @ 14:24
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
so they are going into the same direction as Hollywood.

sequel after sequel after sequel and the a few prequels to tell the whole story, just from a different perspective and when they are done with milking it they are going to release new DLC every other week for £1 a pop...

BORING
aldo_14
06/11/08 @ 14:25
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How tedious Weezer. The point is that "Oh it's the nature of the beast" is not an excuse or a defense for bogus actions or practices.

Surely at some point, though, it's better for a company to sack people than face bankruptcy?
Thunderbolt!
06/11/08 @ 14:29
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
miiiguel

I don't know what that expression means... (shame)

'Stir the pot -

Someone who loves to proliferate the tension and drama between 2 or more feuding people/groups in public to get a raise of people in hopes of starting a shitstorm of drama and uncomfortable conflict, sometimes for personal gain but oftentimes just for the thrill of confrontation.'

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.ph...

There seems to be quite a lot of it in here as it is!
Mogs
06/11/08 @ 14:30
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
He's not saying that though is he aldo_14? He's saying those games can't be EXPLOITED (what a horrible, revealing word) year in year out & milked for all they're worth. He wasn't saying these games won't make money, just that they won't make the mountains of money Activision is now accustomed to. Which ultimately means less originality, less choice & less games for us gamers.

One thing I will say in their credit is at least they've allowed some of the games to be picked up by other publishers instead of just destroying them completely.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 06/11/08 @ 14:33
dingo75
06/11/08 @ 14:31
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The more I hear those suits that run the publishers these days the less I want to play games anymore! :p
miiiguel
06/11/08 @ 14:32
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Thunderbolt: I'm guilty of that often, but this wasn't one of those times. I think... (I mean, everybody loves Obama, no?)
But I really apreciate the tip on the site! Thx a lot.
Thunderbolt!
06/11/08 @ 14:36
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
miiiguel,

Thats cool :)

Anything is better than Bush!
Farfarer
06/11/08 @ 14:36
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hahah, fuck activision.

I mean, at least they're brutally honest about it but in this instance honesty isn't something that makes me respect them any more for it.
Eraysor
06/11/08 @ 14:42
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Suddenly the *real* reason to split StarCraft II into three separate packages one for each faction is revealed :-P

Too fucking right! XD
insincere_dave
06/11/08 @ 14:42
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"don't have the potential to be exploited every year across every platform"

Good to know that original gaming is safe in the hands of these guys!
FooAtari
06/11/08 @ 14:44
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sad.

In Music and Film there always seems to be room for the niche stuff that people make because they love what they are making.

That just doesn't seem to exist in games. Its not just about making the game you want to make and making some money. It's about greed and making as much as they possibly can (huge difference there), if that means releasing the same game year in year so be it.

I find Activisions attitude these days pretty damn Ironic considering how they came to be.

It's pretty depressing, there are very few games that interest me in the run up to crimbo.
jaxon58
06/11/08 @ 14:45
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Games were dumped for not exhibiting "potential to be exploited every year across every platform".

That makes me feel ill. The new EA indeed.
rock27gr
06/11/08 @ 14:53
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So they're adopting the same kind of strategy that gave EA theit bad name? The one they are know abandoning in part?

Then again, that strategy also made EA the biggest 3rd party publisher around, so...
SpaceMidget75
06/11/08 @ 14:56
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I echo Mogs' second (more sane) post.

We all know that businesses are in it to make money. That's not what I take issue with here. He never said these games wouldn't make a profit. He said that they can't be exploited year on year!

That's fucking atrocious and an example of why Activision and EA have turned into a bigger shower of cunts over the years.

Thank god for digital distribution I say.

I'm really looking forward to 2 of those games.... (you can guess which) =]
cam_guin
06/11/08 @ 15:03
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Transformers, Wolverine, Monsters Versus Aliens and Ice Age...Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2 on the way; more James Bond and Tony Hawk outings"

"the eggs of numbing inevitability" I think Bill Bailey once said.
samaran
06/11/08 @ 15:08
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
fuck these guys for dropping blood in the sand. i'll happily allow someone else to exploit 6000 yen out of my bank account in exchange for that game.
berelain
06/11/08 @ 15:10
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Shit, over-egged games coming our way, then!
Weezer
06/11/08 @ 15:43
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mogs, I'm not defending the guy's actions! I'm saying that comparing what he's said to Saddam Hussein's systematic gassing of innocent Kurds show a bit of a lack of compassion or understanding.

But yes - I agree with the sentiment. It's like having triplets and only favouring the tall, pretty one 'cos it might become a rich celebrity one day... Of course, behind every great sequel is some original IP. You'd hope.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 06/11/08 @ 15:46
Thalanos
06/11/08 @ 15:49
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Makes you wonder how Guitar Hero ever got made.

Edit: Oh yes, that was RedOctane, picked up by Activision when it was 'exploitable' enough.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 06/11/08 @ 15:51
Freek
06/11/08 @ 16:03
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It makes business sense. But shouldn't the PR department step in to make sure nobody actually goes out and explicitly starts talking about how to milk a franchise and the consumer for every last penny??

At the very least try to avoid using the word "exploit".
Edited 1 times, most recently on 06/11/08 @ 16:04
Matfink
06/11/08 @ 16:03
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Call of Annualisation: IP Exploitation 09.
Bah. Surely the millions of profit they make could shelter a few creative underdogs?
aldo_14
06/11/08 @ 16:07
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
He's not saying that though is he aldo_14? He's saying those games can't be EXPLOITED (what a horrible, revealing word) year in year out & milked for all they're worth. He wasn't saying these games won't make money, just that they won't make the mountains of money Activision is now accustomed to. Which ultimately means less originality, less choice & less games for us gamers.

One thing I will say in their credit is at least they've allowed some of the games to be picked up by other publishers instead of just destroying them completely.


He's not, but neither is he really being Saddam Hussein either. Any company, like it or lump it, has a responsibility to make money for its shareholders, investors and even staff.

Yeah, there are ethical issues in it - and the priority of jobs over xx cash is very different depending on your position - but this comes from an earnings call made after the Vivendi merger and an almost $200m loss last quarter. Of course he's going to focus on strip mining the studios for cash, he's talking to people that are only interested in it (the kind that love words like exploitation and franchise)- same as a developer hypes their game for its gameplay etc in a press conference to games journos.

It doesn't mean I approve of dropping the games (especially not Brutal Legend) and firing people, but it doesn't make him an OMG Evil Dictator Of Capitalism either. I'm pretty sure most mergers result in jobs being lost in the aftermath (and that always sucks), but it's a bit hyperbolic to compare it to dictatorial mass murder.
michaelius
06/11/08 @ 16:09
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
At least they are honest :)
curtlikesmeat
06/11/08 @ 16:16
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Meh, just vote with your wallet and don't by God of War 5.
polaris70
06/11/08 @ 16:30
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
They are not only exploiting games but also us, the customer. There is no chance of me buying COD:World at War until it comes down to about £15-£20 quid. The game is nothing more than a re-skinned mod (I got bored after 4 hours) and should be charged as such. Outrageous words from Activision, the new EA.
neilka
06/11/08 @ 16:59
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I look forward to people still talking about Monsters versus Aliens in 10 years time.
smelly
06/11/08 @ 17:07
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>Yeah, because Ghostbusters has never made any money!

But it cant be easily turned into a yearly franchise with regular shitty updates (which is what they want)
PierrePressure
06/11/08 @ 17:11
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The man Kotick is quite clearly a cock.

Capitalism at it's worst.
IronCladChicken
06/11/08 @ 17:33
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@smelly
I think Ghostbusters2 prooved that it could very easily be made into anoyther shitty franchise?

Comments: 1-50 of 59 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery