Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 3 Next

Advertisement

War, Interrupted Interview

PC MMO Interview by Rob Fahey

2 November, 2007

Page 1 of 3. Page 2 ->

It's fair to describe EA Mythic's Warhammer as one of the most keenly anticipated massively multiplayer games on the slate right now - so the groans and frustrated harrumphs heard when the company announced a three month delay to its launch schedule earlier today are only to be expected.

Even if it's a bit further away now, though, Warhammer is still a big deal. It's Electronic Arts' first dalliance with MMORPG publishing since Ultima Online all those years ago, for one thing. More interestingly for MMOG players, it's also developer Mythic's next title after the celebrated Dark Age of Camelot, which was much-loved by fans for its large-scale Realm vs Realm battles.

With that in mind, we collared EA Mythic's boss, Mark Jacobs, and shook him about roughly until he spilled the beans on the reasons for the delay - and how the game is taking shape. (Don't worry, no developers were harmed in the making of this feature - it's all done with computer graphics these days.) Firstly, what's going on?

Mark Jacobs: We are extending the development schedule of Warhammer for another quarter, into the second quarter of 2008. We're doing this really for two major reasons.

Number one, to put more polish onto the game - the teams have been working very hard on delivering content, and what we were finding is that they were cutting into the polish time. They were getting things done on a content side - quests, monsters - but they were getting them done a little bit later. When John [Riccitiello, EA supreme overlord] said last night on the conference call that we missed our milestone, that's absolutely correct. We had a choice - either we could continue cutting into the polish time and release in February, or we could extend the schedule.

The other thing that we saw was that during beta, some of our players told us that they didn't like certain aspects. A lot of quests were great, but some of them weren't so great; they loved certain things, but others needed more work. They loved Realm vs Realm play, but missed some of the RvR from Dark Age of Camelot. We looked at that as well, and said okay - we'd better take a little longer on the feature-set.

When you put the two together, between the content polish and the feature-set, we made the obvious, although not easy, call. Take the extra time, get it right, and be sure that when this is released, it is a great game.

'War, Interrupted' Screenshot 1

Eurogamer: So would you say that the work needed on the RvR play, based on your beta feedback, is a major reason for the delay?

Mark Jacobs: That's mostly true; the RvR has been a factor in the delay, absolutely. The only thing I'd like to add is that polish has also been a major factor for us. I've said this before, but right now, the game that has raised the quality bar higher than anyone else, ever, has to be Blizzard's World of Warcraft. Whether you love the game, hate the game or don't really care either which way, you can't argue that the quality that Blizzard put into that product is outstanding.

They have raised the bar beyond all other games. We had a choice - we could have looked at our game and said, "we're going to be feature complete, we'll have some polish, but not quite enough polish." We said no. We didn't want to do it; EA didn't want us to do it.

They wanted this to be truly a great next-generation MMO, and that includes the feature-set - including, like you said, RvR. Realistically, the single most distinguishing feature about Warhammer, just like Camelot, the feature that is key to our success, is RvR. Between that, and the additional polish, that's the reason for the delay.

Eurogamer: What state is the game in right now?

Mark Jacobs: There are two aspects to that - one is what we call feature and content complete, and the other is polish. What we're hoping to have by the end of the year, or early next year, is the game being content complete. That does not mean polished; that means the first cut, or the second cut, of all the stuff is in the game.

In terms of features, then, we're not that close. We've still got a lot to do - we need to add the open RvR that we spoke about in the announcement, and we need to do a bunch of other things. I don't know what percentage that is, exactly. However, the beauty is that if we accomplish that, meet all our goals and get content complete, you can see how much time we're going to have to polish the game before release.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-15 of 15 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
CaptCastle
02/11/07 @ 18:50
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As much as it's cool to hate EA, I wonder if Mythic could have done this without EA's money behind them, or if we'd have gotten a rushed release.
Optyk
02/11/07 @ 18:53
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I didn't know EA were publishing this until now :/

One of the things that made WoW so succesful is the fact that a super computer wasn't needed to run it, even my PC could run it. I will probably have and need a new PC by the time this comes out, however.
Cannibal
02/11/07 @ 19:00
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The guy loves to talk about polish don't he?
Optyk
02/11/07 @ 19:04
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Not to be confused with THE Polish. We don't need any o' them in our games...>_>
Edited 1 times, most recently on 02/11/07 @ 19:04
Stickman
02/11/07 @ 19:35
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Blah, blah, blah, RELEASE THE GAME!
AZA
02/11/07 @ 20:12
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I still think they should have made it 40k we don't need ANOTHER fantasy based MMORPG

oh and it should have been 40k that plays like Planet side, now THAT I'd pay for :P
Cannibal
02/11/07 @ 20:14
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nah, it should of been Gorka Morka. The greatest Games Workshop creation.
AZA
02/11/07 @ 20:33
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Cannibal

You Sir are a genius and 100% correct :)
Katsumoto
02/11/07 @ 21:03
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
heh, a gorka morka mmo. Auto Assault done right?

Personally I thought this was a remarkably frank interview. Lets hope it will turn out to be an undeniable WoW beater.
ZuluHero
02/11/07 @ 21:46
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I would love a Necromunda MMO. Guilds = gangs, or you could just play as a gun for hire or even an upper-class spyre hunter (cool PvP oppertunities). After exploring the slums all day, kick back in a slum bar, get info and quests or hire other players to join your gang (or look for a gang to join) :)

It could even have territory to fight over! :D
Freki
02/11/07 @ 22:34
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There is allegedly a 40K MMO in the works, was announced earlier this year, may turn out to be vapourware, if not will still take several years before it comes to fruition.
Clive Dunn
02/11/07 @ 22:58
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So to summarise - The Beta wasn't good enough ( and everyone I know on it agrees ) and we hope 3 months can fix that.

Call me Mr Cynical but 3 months isn't enough, if EA was serious it would go back a year.

In all honesty, the biggest problem every other MMO has is the expectations placed upon it after the success of WoW. "Is this a game that can attract 9 million subs ?" or "Is this is a project that can attract 9 million subs ?" are very different questions.
Skurmedel
03/11/07 @ 02:40
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I hope this has a niche, because just copying WoW won't work, and there are people out there looking for a different, fantasy-mmo which doesn't follow the WoW-model. Hopefully they've worked hard to do the Warhammer world justice (Relic did a good job with the 40k but that was an entirely different genre)
Katsumoto
03/11/07 @ 10:41
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
oh man, a NECROMUNDA mmo. that would be fucking amazing! Shame they don't even sell that in the shops anymore, you can only buy it online etc. Surely their best game?
groovychainsaw
05/11/07 @ 11:22
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Its a good point about polish, i think one of the main reasons for WoW's success is the simplicity of the UI, any other MMO I've played since always takes a while to get used to, WoW just clicked (especially after one or two early tweaks they made).

Comments: 1-15 of 15 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery