Valve: No new Portal this year Related content
-
Half-life 2: Episode 2 - Three games, one box
-
Latest Portal screenshots
- Interview Narbacular Drop [44]
Valve: No new Portal this year News
PC Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 News by Robert Purchese
Valve's Doug Lombardi has told Eurogamer that you won't see a new Portal this year.
Instead, the developer will knuckle down and try to do something as revolutionary as Half-Life 2 was to the original Half-Life - because that's the Valve way.
"In typical Valve tradition, it won't be Portal with different colours," said Lombardi, dressed as a companion cube. "I think that when you hit something like that, you have two choices: you can quickly replicate it and stick it out there - do the opportunistic thing and cash in on it; or you can do the crazy thing like we did after Half-Life was so successful and go off and try and say, 'Okay, that was revolutionary, so its successor has to be equally as revolutionary.'
"That's the spirit I think we're approaching it in," he added. "You won't see a new Portal at retail this Christmas because of that. That's the trade off. People want more, but we don't want to give them more of the same right away because that would just be boring."
Portal was released last October and Valve was surprised at the effect it had; Lombardi says it shocked him to see people dressed as companion cubes as soon as a week or two after release.
The original game - described as an "experiment" - went very well, then, and now Valve is doing plenty of research and development to find out what "more" it is going to offer.
"I think you have to be ambitious. For us, that's really paid off. Half-Life 2 was the right decision, it was painful, six years and upwards of 40 million dollars to develop, but that paid off. That's our recipe," concluded Lombardi.
Are you excited about Portal on PC/Xbox 360/PlayStation 3?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games
Related Games
Portal
Latest Features
-
Portal Interview [44]
-
Portal Interview [19]
-
Portal Review [104]
-
Portal Interview [32]
-
Portal Interview [34]
Latest Videos
Half-life 2: Episode 2 - Three games, one box [12] 17 May, 2007
Latest News
-
Gabe Newell wins GDC Pioneer Award [16]
-
Kim Swift leaves Valve for Airtight [29]
-
Valve bundles 22 games for USD 99 [30]
-
Portal XBLA coming next week [30]
-
Pick up Portal for half-price on Steam [3]
Latest Screenshots
14 December, 2007 [5]
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Comments: 1-35 of 35 in total
|
0
Portal was excellent and is one of very few games I really do intend to play again one day. I'm actually not too concerned that they're not going to rush out more content for this Christmas. I kind of figured we'd probably have to wait for another Orange Box style pack alongside Episode Three anyway, so a bit of a wait for something really good isn't too difficult to endure.
|
|
Triggerhappytel
25/04/08 @ 16:18
0
But honestly, I don't think anyone expected a new Portal this year - this is Valve, after all!
$40 million for Half-Life 2 though? Fucking hell. Its worth it, but jeez, that's a lot of cash. |
|
That_Happy_Cat
25/04/08 @ 16:18
0
Yes... they are in a great position where for some reason they can act as a publisher whilst OTHER publishers let them sell their games over Steam giving Valve enough money to develop new games that compete with the new games those other publishers are publishing.
Valve... kudos to you. Other publishers.... DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH! |
|
0
I sincerely wish more developers would adopt (or were allowed to by their publishers) that blizzard-style "done when it's good and ready" approach to design. It always pays dividends in the long term, in harbouring the devout loyalty of gamers everywhere. I hope they take as long as they bloody well please with portal 2, and I expect it to show every hour of effort that went into it.
|
|
Penguinzoot
25/04/08 @ 16:52
0
Have to admit, I haven't played the first yet (I know, shame on me). I've been saving it for a rainy day so I can fully savour it. But with GTA IV coming out next week, I don't know when I shall find the time ;-)
/glances guiltily over at stack of uncompleted games |
|
0
WooHoo!!! Well I wish Valve would take the time to show the PS3 community they matter. We're still waiting on that patch to fix the shoddy job EA's devs did on OB. They command a lot ot deserved respect, but their attitude towards PS3 development, in retrospect really doesn't do them any favours. If they didn't have faith in the system then they shouldn't have agreed to have their game represented on the platform. Delivering a half arsed job doesn't do anybody any favours.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 25/04/08 @ 17:55
|
|
RabidChild
25/04/08 @ 17:57
0
"In typical Valve tradition, it won't be Portal with different colours," said Lombardi, dressed as a companion cube.
teehee |
|
hiddenranbir
25/04/08 @ 18:13
0
This is why valve rule.
And silly numpties like Koei drool and get no respects (or monies) from me. ---$40 million for Half-Life 2 though? Fucking hell. Its worth it, but jeez, that's a lot of cash.--- The cool thing is, they didn't set that as the budget. They just got on with developing and whatever the end cost - so be it. I consider a rather risky thing but god damn it, the reward was well worth it.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 25/04/08 @ 19:14
|
|
0
I'm strange - I felt very "meh - that was okay but overhyped" after playing portal from beginning to end.
Then you should've played it before the hype. I might have felt the same way if I'd only played it now. The internet has ruined Portal, and I'm so glad I got to it before that happened. 'Okay, that was revolutionary, so its successor has to be equally as revolutionary.' To be honest I don't agree with that assessment of Half-Life 2. |
|
muscleblade
28/04/08 @ 07:35
0
Valve is fantastic. Take your time guys. HL2 Episode 3 will be great. Make it short but sweet like episode 2.
|
|
0
"A level editor for this would be a fantastic addition, enable user created content. Like the N+ one, but bigger. :o) "
Frumper, check out the Hammer editor, Valve released it yonks ago (previously Worldcraft), and it allows you to create your own levels. I would be happier if they said "we are going to make something as revolutionary as HL1" instead of HL2, because 1 was a much better game. Sure number 2 was more rounded and polished, but it never really had those awesome standout moments that made 1 such a good game for me. All IMO of course. |
|
0
"To be honest I don't agree with that assessment of Half-Life 2. "
Gotta remember that when HL2 came out not only did it raise the bar technically (hey, it still looks perfectly acceptable today, and the facial modelling /animation laughs in most other games' faces.) but it integrated physics in a way that hadn't really been -successfully- done before. It also came out at a time when it was still very common to take players out of the action and into a pre-rendered or non-interactive cutscene, but now we've seen the way Valve do it, it's often seen as detrimental to the game to do this, except for effect (like in Bioshock). Maybe it doesn't seem so revolutionary now, because most of its best features have just been absorbed into Modern FPS games, but I remember playing it when it came out, and there was nothing like the city at the beginning, or slicing your way through ravenhol(d)m at the time. I'll concede that it didn't change the way we think about games forever, which is maybe what you want 'revolutionary' to mean. I think it was more like a series of mini-revolutions. |
|
0
I don't agree that it really looked that good. Doom 3 came out earlier, and THAT raised the bar in terms of completely hiding the polygons and making us feel as if we were looking at a CG movie. HL2, in comparison, just felt like HL1 with sharper textures.
The physics were nice, but have they really influenced anything? The only physics we really see to this day are hardly of consequence, just some falling barrels or chucking stuff at the enemy (basically just another way to shoot). Also, I don't get what everyone's deal is with Ravenholm. Aside from (only) the first time I encountered one of those fast jumping headcrab zombies, it seemed really boring to me. Just felt like... just another HL2 engine level made by a fan in the level editor, with low lighting. Idunno. It seemed mundane, especially in comparison with some of the "on the road" sequences with the boat or the buggy where you'd stop at points of interest every now and then (which is really the only thing I remember the game fondly for). And this: It also came out at a time when it was still very common to take players out of the action and into a pre-rendered or non-interactive cutscene, I've been hearing this stuff for a while, but you know what? I can skip a cutscene. Being forced to sit around and wait for the NPC to stop talking and unlock the door for me is, IMHO, much, much more aggravating than a skippable cutscene. And when you do want to watch a cutscene you don't have to worry about story elements you missed because you happened to not be looking where the game wanted you to look. |
Comments: 1-35 of 35 in total
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
