Uncharted 2: Among Thieves

The action-adventure goes online.

Surprises don't come often in this job. Whether it's down to leaks, or rumours, or press cynicism, or PR plans that slow the flow of information from a trickle to a drip - or just the fact that so many games developers so reliably do what exactly you'd expect them to - it's rare to see a games journalist raise an eyebrow, never mind gasp in shock. So it was with great satisfaction that Naughty Dog stunned a room full of us, from all around the world, with its Uncharted 2 presentation in baking-hot Los Angeles last week.

"Inside the studio we have a strong sense of theatricality, I think that's part of what makes the games as enjoyable as they are," smiles co-lead designer Richard Lemarchand a little later, every inch the Englishman abroad with his summer blazer and tidy hair. "We couldn't resist the temptation..."

Like all good theatrical surprises, it started with a feint: a video showing Nathan Drake leaping and scrambling up and over the tin shacks of a Nepalese village, much like what's already been seen of the game. Then he reached a rooftop, and the camera panned down to reveal a gaggle of enemies... with red nicknames over their heads. Uncharted 2: Among Thieves has online multiplayer.

In brief: there are two five-on-five competitive modes that we know about (more to come, we're assured), plus co-op campaigns for three players that are separate from the single-player story, but revisit much of it in tweaked form. We played all these modes. There will also be a "cinema" replay mode that captures full matches with free camera control, and a stat-tracking website. The feature-set seems to ape Halo 3's - hardly a bad role-model.

'Uncharted 2: Among Thieves' Screenshot 1

Naughty Dog's dirty jeans engine remains second-to-none.

Online multiplayer isn't a surprising feature in itself, of course, but we never expected it of Uncharted. Although it did have its fair share of gun battles, 2007's Drake's Fortune cast itself as the PS3's romantic lead, a dashing yarn of light-hearted, ledge-hanging high adventure in the Tomb Raider mould. It had puzzles, exploration, treasure hunts and platforming ("traversal" is what they're calling it now, apparently). It was the very model of a single-player action-adventure. It doesn't seem an obvious candidate for online multiplayer.

"It is obvious!" disagrees Naughty Dog's co-president Christophe Balestra, a serious-looking coder with a French accent and close-cropped hair. "Looking at Uncharted, the first one, Drake is never by himself, there's always somebody with him. And we felt that we had the game mechanics to do it. We have a great cover system, and while you're climbing on walls you can shoot enemies... We thought we could use the verticality of the levels and do something unique, something new."

"Unrestricted combat" is Naughty Dog's buzzword for Uncharted 2. "We're extremely excited about the unrestricted combat," says Lemarchand. "We did a couple of important things - first of all, we made it so that no matter what traversal mode Drake was in, he could still grab his gun and take aim. Immediately that means that we can create a combat set-up anywhere in the game. The other thing that's just been very important for the single-player and multiplayer experience is that we've allowed Drake and his allies and enemies to do all of their traversal moves on any moving object."

'Uncharted 2: Among Thieves' Screenshot 2

New poster-girl Chloe takes the treasure in Plunder.

Basically, this means you can take aim with your weapon and fire from any pose and any vantage point - clinging to a ledge, a ladder, a pole. Conscious that Uncharted sometimes felt like two games tacked together, a shooter and a platformer - "It has its own rhythm, but to us they felt slightly separate," allows Lemarchand - Naughty Dog has sought to blur the lines and blend them completely. You can shoot while climbing; you climb to shoot.

The result, in competitive multiplayer, is an extremely athletic, free-roaming and opportunistic variant of the third-person cover shooter. The strict frontlines, back-alleys and choke points of standard map design don't really apply. You don't need to learn where all the sniping points are when you can shoot from halfway up a wall. You don't need to seek the long way round to sneak up on a rooftop menace when you can clamber up and pull him off the ledge. You don't need to jump around like a hyperactive child on a trampoline when you can dodge fire with elegant, motion-captured dives.

You do, however, need to think a bit about where and when to do your shooting. You won't be circle-strafing too often in Uncharted 2; shooting from the hip while running full-pelt is very inaccurate, and movement while holding L1 to sight your gun is extremely slow. This serves to slow the pace and halt the flow a little, at least while you're still unused to the slightly different rhythm of Uncharted 2's deathmatch march. With all the clambering and cover, the controls are on the elaborate side for a multiplayer shooter, with lots of contextual variation; but they're predictable and well-tuned, and the animation is fantastic.

We played rounds of team deathmatch - a self-explanatory race to 25 kills - and Plunder, a capture-the-flag variant in which teams track down treasure artefacts and try to get them back to their respective safe points. The latter encourages closer teamwork, as the heavy statues slow down and disarm their bearers, and force them into the open somewhat. Teams are split into heroes and villains, the former a cast of scruffy, bare-headed adventurers including Drake himself, the latter a shadier bunch of black-clad goons.

The Nepalese village map is a dense tangle of muddy roads and dilapidated buildings, littered with cover opportunities and signs to hang off one-handed. Weapons are honest, sturdy firearms in the AK47 vein, plus grenades, and there's a simplified and weighty melee that offers an instant kill from behind. Initial impressions are very Gears of War, very Metal Gear Online, but that's not exactly fair - conditioned by years of manipulating stolid soldiers, most of us just weren't thinking in terms of Uncharted 2's freedom of movement.

If the competitive multiplayer presents fresh mechanics in a standard setting, Uncharted 2's co-op is a more unusual proposition all-round. Three's a crowd by most standards, and the scenarios on offer sit somewhere between the complete co-op campaign of Resident Evil 5, say, and the map-based challenges of Resistance 2. They are self-contained mini-adventures that rehash parts of the single-player game but have been remixed for co-op play, light on the platforming (sorry, traversal) and heavy on the frenetic combat - at least, in the example we played.

'Uncharted 2: Among Thieves' Screenshot 3

Co-op in action. Points bonus for torching Fiat 500: unconfirmed.

In a gritty, but slightly more urban Nepalese setting once more, Drake, Sully and new girl Chloe fight through tangled streets, cloistered courtyards and ruined launderettes. Enemies pour at them from all directions, encouraging more movement and improvisation, and less rehearsed cover-flank-advance tactics. There's scoring to keep you motivated.

Fallen comrades stay alive for a little while and can be revived on the spot if you get to them in time, otherwise they'll respawn at the last checkpoint. Some of the stealthier enemies creep up behind players and grab them in a chokehold - a team-mate will need a very carefully-aimed headshot or well-timed melee to save them. It's not all cloak-and-dagger by any stretch of the imagination though, as later in the level you're faced with hulking, armour-clad, minigun-touting brutes straight out of Army of Two.

'Uncharted 2: Among Thieves' Screenshot 4

It's a very grenade-heavy game.

In fact, you could call Uncharted 2's co-op Army of Three, and the comparison is by no means an insult. It's robust, rough-and-tumble, contained and exciting action, with some neat co-op mechanics, marred only by a couple of ugly checkpoints with spawn-camping AI. The moments that require player co-operation to progress - gathering at a set point to give each other boosts over a fence, for example - seem to be rather perfunctory pacing devices at the moment, but we're sure Naughty Dog can come up with some more imaginative uses for them.

Naughty Dog went this route with the co-op because it wasn't prepared to compromise the true single-player adventure that fans of the first Uncharted expect. "The thing is, when we started work on Uncharted 2, we developed the story for the single-player at the start and then we decided to do co-op," says Balestra. "You'll be able to play three big sections of the single-player with different set-ups, so the enemies aren't exactly the same, you might need your friends to progress through the level. We still wanted to not take any shortcuts in the story just to make it work for multiplayer or vice versa - we wanted to make the single-player as good as we can."

These co-op set-pieces will be tied together with cut-scenes to give them a narrative thrust. "We created a bunch of original content for the new sections in terms of the in-game cinematic moments that tie the experience together," says Lemarchand. "They're actually very cool. It's almost like little glimpses into a parallel universe where different combinations of characters are taking on sections of the single-player experience in a completely original way."

They can even be mixed and matched with other multiplayer modes and each other, he reveals. "In fact, we've devised a whole bunch of different playlists, schedules of different combinations of locations and game modes that players can choose, and then play experiences that work really well."

Though neither he nor Balestra will be drawn on the possibility of downloadable content (other than to say "we're definitely very enthused, of course"), Lemarchand does reveal that Naughty Dog intends to keep these playlists updated. "Because of the way that the technology's structured we can create new playlists on the fly that are small bits of data that propagate over the network without the need for any kind of intrusive download. That'll let us do special events," he says.

New to online multiplayer - the only social game it's ever made was racing spin-off Jak X - Naughty Dog has clearly been doing its homework. Playlists on rotation, a website boasting stats and leaderboards, a currency system across the multiplayer modes to give you a little persistent encouragement: Uncharted 2 has everything the modern multiplayer game could need or want, including the cinema replay mode, aimed at machinima enthusiasts as much as exultant teabaggers.

'Uncharted 2: Among Thieves' Screenshot 5

Teams are split into heroes (dirty jeans) and villains (gimp masks).

Every multiplayer game (deathmatch, anyway - "we're not sure yet" if it will be supported in co-op, says Balestra) will be recorded to your hard drive. It can be replayed from any player's point of view or from a free camera, and broadcast online to anyone in your party. Characters' lips will even by synced with voice chat, allowing virtual movie directors to act out scenes.

Naughty Dog has thought of everything. But has it really thought about why it's adding online multiplayer to Uncharted 2? Has it thought about whether all this boisterous skirmishing is the right thing for these characters, this setting, this style of game, and what it might do to Uncharted's already delicate balance of carefree adventure and strife? Some might cynically claim that Naughty Dog has added multiplayer just because it can, because everyone else does, because it's what the market expects.

'Uncharted 2: Among Thieves' Screenshot 6

New poster-girl Chloe takes the treasure in Plunder.

Balestra is firm. "No, absolutely not. Not pressure from the market, it's something that we've been wanting to do. One thing I want to say is that we added more people to the team to do multiplayer. We don't want to have less levels or worse storytelling in single-player because we wanted to do multiplayer. It's going to be a great experience in single-player."

We'll have to take his word for it for now - and since Naughty Dog's high standards are a matter of record, that's easy enough to do. After Drake's Fortune, it's easy to have confidence in the quality of the solo adventure. After playing the game and talking to Balestra and Lemarchand, it's easy to believe they have an equal grasp of what it takes to make a multiplayer hit - and we won't have to wait long to know for sure. Uncharted 2 has a public multiplayer beta lined up for June, and anyone who picks up Sucker Punch's inFamous in the US gets automatic entry. The surprise won't last, but hopefully, the smiles will.

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is due out exclusively for PS3 this autumn.

Comments (51) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Widge #1 3 years ago

    EG, if you get to a stage where you have an interview with these guys.... ask if the co-op will have some sort of AI director to keep things eternally fresh.

    and yay, this sounds great.
  • the_dudefather #2 3 years ago

    Co-op? F-yeah!

    The orignal was a pretty charming little game (reminisant to Sands of time for me) , so looking forward to this
  • silke #3 3 years ago

    Fuck. I knew I wished for too much. Well, at least now I know what to blame when the singleplayer campaign proves to be four hours in length and not even near the first game in quality. I for one certainly didn't want any multiplayer. Let some games remain singleplayer affairs, please.

    But of course, if they do prove me wrong, I'll be more than happy to admit it.
  • Gaol #4 3 years ago

    I was worried about the addition of multiplayer but this article is reassuring.

    Looks awesome so far. Expectectation level now very high :)
  • Ninja_Tino #5 3 years ago

    Do NOT like the Fiat 500 joke. As my photo shows, I have one. Great car. Take it back!
  • suicida #6 3 years ago

    Why? Why does every game need a MP or co-op mode shoehorned into it these days? As the poster above said, as long as the singleplayer campaign doesn't suffer as a result I won't mind but this article hasn't exactly got me singing from the rooftops...
  • gohda #7 3 years ago

  • Pedrolot #8 3 years ago

    Most wanted game for me this year.

    Without a doubt.
  • RESIDENT_nEVILe #9 3 years ago

    As long as it doesn't affect the quality of the single player campaign Naughty Dog can stick the entire first season of Noel's House Party on the disk, for al I care.

    Off course, if multiplayer is any good I shall be the first to apologise, but recently all I've seen MP modes do is divert money, resources, dev time and disk space from the main event. But ND are a talented bunch, so who knows?

    I didn't play Uncharted and think 'yknow this would be great as an online Capture The Flag type game or maybe if they shoe horn in an annoying AI buddy to steal my ammo and chase me with green herbs and generally act like a fuckwit... ' Sorry, wrong game.

    What I did think when I first played Uncharted was 'What an amazing old school adventure game - could do with a bit more climbing/exploration and a bit less tearing/shooting.'
  • shotgun44 #10 3 years ago

    do not want co-op! I just don't use it. why do devs insist on adding coop to EVERY game!? not everyone knows 20 other gamers who all buy games religiously :/
  • Burkey123 #11 3 years ago

    I'll echo the comments about single player not taking a hit because of multiplayer.
    The first one is fantastic and hoping that this one is just as good in single player. Multiplayer, meh.
    Edited by 1 at 27/04/09 @ 19:24
  • Darren #12 3 years ago

    Just watched the co-op/multiplayer trailer over on GameTrailers.com and although I've no interest in that element of the game particularly, I can't deny that it looks stunning graphically, especially the animation, and it's already looking very slick and polished.

    Loved the original game for its sheer cinematic epicness so the sequel is high up on my Most Wanted Games of 2009 list. Well, actually so far it's a short list with only this and Banjo-Tooie so far but it's early days yet so I'm sure it'll get longer. :)
  • septimus #13 3 years ago

    Loved the first one, and I don't think they are stupid enough to mess this one up.

    Game of the Year... again.. for me.
  • dominalien #14 3 years ago

    Well, here goes my chance of getting that platrophy in U2. I really don't see myself playing any multiplayer anytime soon.

    I'm glad multiplayer is DLC in RE5 - this way I'll probably get the plat sometime. Same goes for Bioshock - I just don't care for the stupid challenge rooms, and I'm well on my way through Survivor to get the remaining trophies including plat. ME - got the plat, didn't have to wade through any more time trials than absolutely necessary. Would not have been possible had the extra content been included with the game from the start.
  • the_dudefather #15 3 years ago

    Games have managed to pull off adding a MP experience to a previously single player game before, MGS4 for example, it's as complete as any other MGS game, even with the current gen upgrade (in before lolmovie) and it featured a completely separate MP mode, GTA4 is another example

    The first game apparently sucked according to the internet (at the time) due to being a gears/tomb raider clone, now this time around the first game was perfect and they are ruining by adding multiplayer

    wait for a review/preview/play it yourself before making your mind up, just don't write off the game too early because of an extra mode and proclaim it an 'epic fail' or whatever because of Resi 5.
  • Erebu #16 3 years ago

    @ Crofto

    It's too early to judge the game, let's wait till we get more information.
  • El-Dev #17 3 years ago

    It's nice of Crofto to put his photo up so we know he's not an "acne ridden little twat".

    Probably wouldn't spend much time playing Uncharted 2 online as I don't like playing shooters online. Never have doubt I ever will.
    I would like to see more puzzles, bit less shooting and no zombies/monsters. If those things happen then it will be the greatest game ever made in my opinion.

    It looks pretty awesome as well, other developers should take notes from Naughty Dog.

    Ninja-tino, that car is nearly as gay as your uniform.
    Edited by 1 at 27/04/09 @ 20:11
  • Rodchenko #18 3 years ago

    Naughty Dog are inevitably going to spend their limited development time - which would have previously been exclusive to single-player content - on both aspects, and thus it doesn't take a brain surgeon to work out the result.

    It doesn't take a brain surgeon either to actually read an article to its end before mouthing off lengthy whinging posts and calling other people names. Because there it says that they hired extra people to implement the MP in order to not take away from the SP experience.
  • NotSoSlim #19 3 years ago

    Everyone bitching...go watch the vids available!! Whats wrong with it..looks mint

    http://uk .ps3.ign.com/dor/objects/142259...
    Edited by 1 at 27/04/09 @ 20:44
  • bad09 #20 3 years ago

    co-op. The curse of the current gen (and that's coming from someone who loves L4D!).

    Please. DO NOT GIVE THE SINGLE PLAYER A AI CO-OP BUDDY! Make them different modes or something. I don't want co-op but I want Uncharted 2. PLEASE no more killing games I like with co-op. PLEASE.

    Anyway, gone from excited to "ah, man another RE5" until proven wrong.... :(
  • Ninja_Tino #21 3 years ago

    Damn, gamers are such whiney bitches. Never satisfied. Ever!
  • drewman5150 #22 3 years ago

    Looking forward to this, the first one still holds up as a first rate example of the genre, and I'd be very surprised if this doesn't disappoint.
    Not too fussed about the five-on-five, but co-op should be excellent.
  • bad09 #23 3 years ago

    Hang on it may be OK. I didn't see it in this article but just read one of EG's "split the feature into news" articles and apparently it is a co-op MODE, so (hopefully) SP is intact....
  • JediMasterMalik #24 3 years ago

    Sounds good that's for sure. I do hope that they improve the explore/adventure of the single player, add puzzles and don't focus too much on the shooting. Considering they now have MP for the trigger happy lot, hopefully they can cut it down in the SP.
  • bad09 #25 3 years ago

    Yeah that's pretty smart thinking JMM, the one problem I had with Uncharted was it is a little bit too shooty. More exploration/puzzle elements and a slower shooting pace would be nice, if you want to ramp it up you just head over to MP. Everybody wins!
  • peterfll #26 3 years ago

    Mulitplayer a surprise? Really?

    How about mind-numbling fucking obvious.

    Is no decent single playing game safe? What's wrong with just making a really really great single player game these days?

    Yes, I'm not much of a multiplayer gamer, but I do like an engaging, well made single player only games and my concern is they're becoming increasingly rare thanks to developers like Naughty Dog assiging resources to making what was a very satisfying single player game into another multi-player bore fest that, heh, probably will be OK but won't set the world alight like most other tacked-on multiplayer modes.
  • shogo10 #27 3 years ago

    No pressure to add multiplayer in this day and age? Right.
  • Katsumoto #28 3 years ago

    You're all forgetting that Crofto is a big gamer with pretty strong but informed opinions on games
  • VandelayIndustries #29 3 years ago

    "Damn, gamers are such whiney bitches. Never satisfied. Ever!"

    Yeah. Where are all those people who were pissing and moaning (and those gloating) over KZ2's lack of co op? I was looking forward to this game anyway, this is the best gaming news I've heard in long long time.
  • shotgun44 #30 3 years ago

  • Ryze #31 3 years ago

    I've only read 90% of the first page, and this is already looking mighty interesting.

    They better have full Home and friendslist functionality in this.
  • Doctor_What #32 3 years ago

    Please be good. Please be good.

    I loved the first one - like others, it's among my tops games of this generation. I was disappointed that the love interest isn't being carried across from the first game, and now multiplayer has been thrown in the mix? I'm really trying not to think about 'Warrior Within'...

    But if any studio can get away with it, it's probably the ND guys. I've not failed to love one of their games yet.
  • Grayvern #33 3 years ago

    If they added extra staff for this then im not worried about the game itself although itll make me feel guilty just like all the shooters I buy and then don't play online.

    + The real important question is how many players on a ps3, co-op is far better in the same room, also the fact that im trying to avoid buying a blu-tooth headset.
  • Beano #34 3 years ago

    Multiplayer and co-op in Uncharted... I did not see that one coming ;)

    The first one was great (better than Gears) and I'm really looking forward to the sequel - although I'm a bit nervous that the multiplayer modes will take developer focus way from the single player campaign like it did with Resistance 2. Hopefully I'm wrong and all elements will be awesome :D
    Edited by 1 at 28/04/09 @ 06:58
  • MrMud #35 3 years ago

    I dont understand why.
    Uncharted was a good singleplayer game, there simply was no need to turn it into multiplayer.
  • makeamazing #36 3 years ago

    I guess the problem is that there will be a section of people who will complain about no MP (including reviewers), so I guess if they are able to add it without affecting the single player version then its probably best that they do (though I am not bothered about online play myself).
  • Doctor_What #37 3 years ago

    It's to prevent resale on the second hand market - if it's single player only then it goes back second hand a lot faster than a mutliplayer game. As simple as that.
  • Fab4 #38 3 years ago

    Fuck me...you give people a greater choice of playing modes and you get castigated. The guy, at the end of the article, said the MP wouldnt take resources from the SP so if you don't want to play MP...er...dont?
  • Les #39 3 years ago

    Don't care about co-op but it's a smart move from a money perspective: It probably adds around a 10 percentage points to the average review score (given that reviewers are co-op whores), which correlate favorably with sales numbers...
  • DrDamn #40 3 years ago

    I'm not a fan of shoehorning but I think the MP at least sounds interesting. Specifically for the reasons they mention that you can shoot at any time. Climbing, Hanging etc. If that is done well and the levels are well designed then it could be a good and unique experience - something different.

    SP on the other had they need to change a few things to get me interested in for a second time. How about using the nice climbing/movement engine to implement some puzzles which tax the brain rather than it just being reduced to a way to get to the next fight? Fights need a bit more variety and not rely so heavily on "yet another wave of bad guy blokes". Shooting needs to be tightened up a bit too. Oh and while it looks very nice in the shots lets have a solid framerate without tearing this time please. :)
  • AusFreelancer #41 3 years ago

    Oli is it another 8/10? (PS3's 10). And will Mr Leadbetter be doing a "technical" comparison on why the 360 version of Rockstar table tennis has 0.0004 more fps than this, despite running at a higher resolution? Aye? Just asking....
  • SleepyMagpie #42 3 years ago

    Only for a PS3 exclusive owner would this rate as another "game of the year".

    I have yet to see such a polished, accomplished piece of software, result in a drab, charm-less, uncharismatic game to a degree the first one did. And there have been some polished pieces of programming turning out gray over the years.

    Why people go on about this series I have no idea.. Oh wait, PS3 exclusively, right!

    Well, at least getting one got me Valkyria Chronicles.
  • AusFreelancer #43 3 years ago

    Ay c'mon sleepy not everyone likes halo either (me included - I think that's drab). Each to their own.
    Edited by 1 at 28/04/09 @ 10:56
  • kinky_mong #44 3 years ago

    @ Crofto: "I smell Resident Evil 5 failure all over again."

    The game that you've played repeatedly in order to get 1000 gamerscore on?
  • SleepyMagpie #45 3 years ago

    Ok, AusFreelancer, I was a bit mean there, to each their own indeed. I hope it turns into something all of us can like though. -Without tasting like chicken, if possible.

  • AusFreelancer #46 3 years ago

    mmmm Chicken......as long as its not a turkey ;p
  • Darren #47 3 years ago

    @kinky_mong - Ignore Crofto. He claims he hates Oblivion but still managed to play it for over 100 hours regardless. Personally if I don't like a game then I don't play it but then I'm clearly not some sort of masochist like Crofto! I think he just hates games myself. ;)
  • aphexstwin #48 3 years ago

    could this be where the blur-ray storage size comes into its own again? mgs4 with all its cutscenes and size of environments and other things like the wealth of weaponry and upgrades, coupled with its multiplayer definitely wouldn't fit onto a dvd9. given the propensity for multiplatform games to come on one dvd9 sized nugget for fear of extra licensing costs, it may be a bonus this is a ps3 exclusive (god knows sony need as many exclusives as they can get) so they can fit a large and varied mp game onto the disk, as well as a very expansive single player world. of course the main crux is development time, how much can ND afford? well, they could bank against the popularity of the first game and dip into the red a little for this one, who knows? the proof of any pudding is in the eating, and i will be happy to spit it out if im wrong.
  • WestBullet #49 3 years ago

    @aphextwin

    What on earth are you talking about?

    Blu Ray lets you have more weapons and upgrades!? Sorry, but that's a load of rubbish. Stuff like that can be compressed heavily. All blu ray is being used for at the moment is packing the disc with tons of uncompressed content to counteract the slow read speed of the PS3's drive.

    The only reason that the MP will be good in this game is if Naughty Dog make it so. It's got nothing to do with disc space. Blu Ray storage is the biggest red herring this gen.
  • aphexstwin #50 3 years ago

    can no cunt 'speak their mind', as invited, on this s(h)ite without getting leapt on?
  • zakrocz #51 3 years ago

    I hope the sequel is better than the first one. When i bought my PS3 recently, all i heard was how great the original game was so i borrowed a copy from a friend and while the game is ok it's not this great underrated treasure that many people have claimed it to be.