Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Two Worlds Interview

PC Xbox 360 Interview by Robert Purchese

17 June, 2007

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

It's not easy being a role-playing game; not when all everyone talks about is your big brother and how good he is. Sure you're different. That's what they all say. Why should we believe you?

Reality Pump has had this problem with Two Worlds ever since it reared its head back in 2005. At first glance it looks strikingly similar to the much-applauded Oblivion. It's on the same platforms, for starters, has the same free-roaming and sprawling gameplay, plus the graphics look as if they could be twins. But underneath all that is a game desperately trying to carve its own identity; one with mounted combat, an item combination system, and that curious MMO-style multiplayer option.

We had a chance to see how it all meshed together in our recent first impressions, but still felt we weren't getting the whole picture. So ahead of its scheduled early August release, we got hold of Zuxxez (publisher in the US and Germany) big-cheese Dirk Hassinger to find out if it was all just a case of mistaken identities.

Eurogamer: What makes Two Worlds different to a game like Oblivion, and why do you think people will prefer your offering?

Dirk Hassinger: Two Worlds may seem to be in the Oblivion template, but the two games are very different once you get beyond the surface. Two Worlds offers a more focused, grittier experience - and a lot of correlating features are deeper in it. Our inventory system is smarter, our magic system is much more complex, and even the way we handle horses has more depth. Beyond those game mechanics we have a much more complex society, with many more factions working within it. Our overarching storyline is a touch darker and more involved, too. Which is not to say Oblivion is a worse game, just that Two Worlds has more 'meat'.

'Two Worlds' Screenshot 1

"Come back; You've left your undies!"

Eurogamer: How much character customisation will be in Two Worlds? Do you think you offer more choice than any other game out there?

Dirk Hassinger: Our commitment to player freedom means our character customisation is seriously deep. We have no class definitions, which means players are free to sculpt their avatar as they like - based on the skills players choose to learn. There's also a really nice progression as skills improve, and the sense of increasing power is really tangible. What's more, there's no level cap on your character. You can keep on progressing indefinitely if you wish. And by talking to the right people you can even undo all of your skill point assignments, then completely re-specialise your character using the points you've already earned.

Eurogamer: Some observers felt Oblivion could be quite shallow and often repetitive, perhaps leaning towards quantity over quality. What sort of storyline, quests, and linearity will we see in Two Worlds? And how will our actions affect the world around us?

'Two Worlds' Screenshot 2

Real men jog in armour.

Dirk Hassinger: The main storyline in Two Worlds is very different to the one in Oblivion. The basic premise is that the world is split into regions defined by various races. Humans, Orcs, Elves and Dwarves are familiar, but races like the Serpents (snake-based people) and the Trachidis (insectoids) should feel fresh even for die-hard fans of the genre.

The Orcs are the 'enemy' race and have been kept at bay ever since their god of war was slain and his body entombed in a secret location. However, the tomb has recently been re-discovered and the Orcs are about to embark on a holy crusade to reclaim their fallen god. Obviously this means things are about to turn nasty, which brings a sense of brooding menace to the game.

You start out as a wandering mercenary trying to find your missing sister. I'm not going to give too much away, but you and your sister are significant to the main story, which will become clear as you encounter members of a secret brotherhood during your personal story arc.

Two Worlds also has more than its fair share of side-quests. There are hundreds of them, and they can affect more than just your statistics - as each race is split into different groups with separate goals and needs, so there are political repercussions for just about everything you do. It's up to you to decide which faction to work for and if your morality will affect the missions you do.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Two Worlds on PC/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-13 of 13 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
UncleLou
17/06/07 @ 09:33
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's extremely difficult to do mounted combat properly and keep it satisfying for the player, but we've worked out our own solution and it works amazingly well. We have various levels of horse riding skill so that the better you are, the more effective you'll be fighting on a mount. High-level players will be able to shoot arrows with the same accuracy as they have on foot. They can even dual-wield bladed weapons if they wish!

And yet it works a lot better in Mount & Blade, a low-budget game made by two people.

It has to be said, the developers have improved the PC version a lot already with patches. The combat still lacks any tactical depth whatsoever though, the item stacking (and magic system) still makes you completely overpowered in a few hours of playing, and there isn't any "role-playing" to speak of (apart from your skills distribution, if you want to count that.) It's an all-out action RPG, albeit with a very weak action part, that pretends to be more, but never really is. Production values are also fairly low throughout, many things just are tacky and cheap .

There is a certain basic amount of fun to be had if, like me, you like experimenting with different stats and skills and are a loot addict (although the game gives away too much stuff to fast), but don't expect a real, deep RPG.
Metalfish
17/06/07 @ 10:28
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh look; orcs, elves, dwarfs. Get you concept artists to draw something, anything that isn't straight out of tolkien, it can't be that much harder to have something approaching an original idea can it?

(While the serpent people seem slightly more interesting it's not like they are been part of the elder scrolls lore -which I doubt surprises anyone).

@UncleLou, good stuff, can you write a review? I'd love to hear the rest of your thoughts.
Edit: Grammarz!
Edited 1 times, most recently on 17/06/07 @ 11:28
azwipe
17/06/07 @ 10:45
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
agreed. i swear i'll kill myself before i kill another bloody orc.
Poorandugly
17/06/07 @ 10:46
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I want to become excited over this because I could really use a good rpg on the 360 right about now. But I just can't. I think it shines through in the interview that they are uncertain of their own product in some instances. When asked about what differs between Two Worlds and Oblivion, they can't come up with much more than "darker theme" and the item combination system. Doesn't sound like much of an improvement, really...
the_dudefather
17/06/07 @ 12:27
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ UncleLou

just tried that mount and blade game, its pretty awesome
Crea
17/06/07 @ 16:38
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The combat still lacks any tactical depth whatsoever though, the item stacking (and magic system) still makes you completely overpowered in a few hours of playing"

Balance is overrated in single-player RPGs. I don't want balance, I want to feel like a god.
Xerx3s
17/06/07 @ 17:38
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The DII style mp should be quite good. I hope.
UncleLou
17/06/07 @ 21:04
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The combat still lacks any tactical depth whatsoever though, the item stacking (and magic system) still makes you completely overpowered in a few hours of playing"

Balance is overrated in single-player RPGs. I don't want balance, I want to feel like a god.


I am pretty glad that you're in an irrelevant minority with that opinion, but yes, then Two Worlds might be the right game for you.
squarejawhero
18/06/07 @ 10:26
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Metalfish - thankyou thankyou thankyou. It's about time someone use their imagination to create a new universe to wander around it. Guild Wars did it to an extent, but it could go further... Mass Effect time, methinks!
bonker
18/06/07 @ 12:37
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Still gagging for the co-op ...
FortysixterUK
19/06/07 @ 14:44
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Once again I have to disagree with the people who are claiming the game is an
" RPG Lite" or " The combat is shallow".

The game has a single mainline quest, with 100's of sub-quests. Like any other big world RPG ever released. It's fun, enjoyable and takes ages to get through even if you only hammer a quarter of the side quests.

Combat STARTS OFF basic, with a three swing attack then a pause, and the ability to step back out of harms way manually.

Later you learn skills that allow you to :-
:-Berserk ( of course lowers AC temporarily ),
:-Roundhouse with a two bladed weapon when surrounded,
:-Dual wield,
:-kick dust into your enemies eyes( temporarily blinding them thus dropping their guard),
:-learn a skill that lets you pull the weapon or shield from their hands.

And that's just some of the melee combat options, there are LOTS more for archery and 5 schools of magic to learn ( I find attack magic weak, but defence and Buff magic is great), plus the admittedly awkward art of horse back melee fighting.

This game is as good or as bad as you make it.

If you like Oblivion, Morrowind, Gothic 2 or 3, or any of the Might and Magic series, then this is for you.

I'm on my 3rd play through, this time on patch 1.4 and it plays better each time and I find lots of new stuff each play.

It's not a perfect game, as there are still some quest bugs, but they are minor in the least, and won't stop you enjoying the game.

Just patch it to V1.4 and you are in for a great time.

UncleLou
20/06/07 @ 11:41
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Combat STARTS OFF basic, with a three swing attack then a pause, and the ability to step back out of harms way manually.

Later you learn skills that allow you to :-
:-Berserk ( of course lowers AC temporarily ),
:-Roundhouse with a two bladed weapon when surrounded,
:-Dual wield,
:-kick dust into your enemies eyes( temporarily blinding them thus dropping their guard),
:-learn a skill that lets you pull the weapon or shield from their hands.


Not only don't you need any of these skills to win every fight, there still isn't any timing or any skill involved. All you ever need to do is click as fast as possible.

That said, there's the overpowered "step back" button which allows you to kill pretty much anything with a level 1 character armed with a toothbrush, with some patience...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 20/06/07 @ 12:42
FortysixterUK
20/06/07 @ 12:42
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lets face it, you just don't like the game ! ( which is fair enough )

as I said in my previous comment:-

"This game is as good or as bad as you make it. "

Comments: 1-13 of 13 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery