Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas 2 Review

Xbox 360 PC PlayStation 3 Review by Kristan Reed

18 March, 2008

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

I'll bring this up again since everyone seems to have forgotten: Ubisoft used to call these games "standalone expansion packs". Everyone knew where they stood. What you were getting was more of the same; new levels built on the same tech with the exact same gameplay, and, as a result, a price tag of less than twenty quid. Take Rainbow Six 3: Black Arrow, and Ghost Recon 2: Summit Strike - great examples of fan service, and we gave both 8/10. Had they been full-price, we might have been grumpier about what were blatant retreads, albeit quality ones. It's all about context.

But since the so-called next generation rolled into town, that approach has been replaced with near-annual updates dressed up as full sequels. GRAW 2 just about got away with it last year, mainly because it was a far more polished offering than the unfinished original and everything it should have been in the first place. Rainbow Six Vegas, though, got most things right first time. More of the same is just...well, going over old ground.

Lasting just seven 'acts' (over 25 scenes each lasting about 10-15 minutes), the single-player campaign is woefully short-lived. Putting the game on at 10am on a leisurely Sunday morning, I'd finished the whole thing before my belly started rumbling for an evening meal - and that's factoring in numerous breaks for snacks, IM chats and idle net-browsing. Your mileage will vary related to difficulty level and your ability to nail terrorists, but the ongoing trend for shorter single-player experiences in blockbuster releases is blatantly in evidence here, with six hours likely to be the average first run-through for most.

'Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas 2' Screenshot 1

Now's not the time for freaky dancing little lady.

Kicking off in Paris five years before the game's near-future setting, the game quickly moves on to the neon trash of Sin City once again, where those dastardly terrorists are up to no good with chemical weapons. "No good", of course, gives us the excuse to shoot some more funny foreigners. Wacka-wacka. The story's not exactly the game's strong point, with a typically anodyne cast and dialogue that washes over you, but, for once, the scale of the task at hand seems credible. It's a slightly more personal affair, where your best efforts don't always yield the desired results. The entire universe isn't going to perish at the hands of someone with short man syndrome or anything; trying to stop trains from blowing up, people being gassed to death and hotels exploding seems a bit more like the sort of thing Rainbow Six would be tasked with.

For the fourth game in a row (if we include both GRAWs), each mission is book-ended by Ubisoft's trademark chopper ride to your destination, complete with stunning, popup-free views. Admittedly the impressiveness of the effect is somewhat dimmed by its predictability and recent over-use, but it's still one of the best ways to get a mission underway, with your briefings and background details formed from the chatter during the journey. On the ground, it conforms to the Rainbow Six template - train stations, office complexes, underground car parks hotels, rooftops, blah - with alternative routes through levels on offer and, thankfully, very little to do on the casino floor (handy, since we left all our money at the games shop).

'Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas 2' Screenshot 2

Frankie Goes To Hollywood plans its latest comeback.

As Bishop, the leader of a three-man squad, you have the option of leading the charge and letting your two team-mates fall in behind you, or playing the cautious tactician and allowing them to take all the risks. Using your men as a battering ram serves as an effective tactic, with their ability to soak up damage curiously far greater than yours - especially if you crank the difficulty level up to Realistic. Employing a recharging health mechanic, this is undoubtedly a far more forgiving affair (even on hard difficulty) than the rather evil old-school Rainbow Sixes, with a fair few checkpoints helping to accelerate progress and minimise the incessant replaying of certain sections. So that's one reason it's a shorter game than it used to be, but let's not forget that seven campaign levels is fewer than usual as well.

While we ponder over the fine detail, it's easy to forget how refined the control system is, and how well it serves a once-complex game. The slick system employed allows you to move freely while dictating the position of your men - whether stacking them up against the next door or requesting them to fall in behind you. Using a combination of context-sensitive commands and intuitive d-pad commands, the game second-guesses your intentions correctly. You can make use of cover by holding the left trigger near to where you want to go, moving the left stick to peek out in the required direction, with options to blindfire too. The overall range of commands has been reduced since, say, 2004's disappointing Lockdown, but all the essentials remain, like being able to frag or flash and then clear, and tagging enemies you want your team-mates to take out first with the left bumper. Ill-advised additions like heartbeat sensors and overly convoluted go-codes are firmly in the dustbin of history, it seems.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Vegas 2 on PC/PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 83 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
syphaa
18/03/08 @ 15:50
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmmm...was going to get it...loved the first one!
Shall have a blast and see what I personally think. Expected score tbh.
George Roper
18/03/08 @ 15:55
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yawwwnnn

Couldn't be bothered one jot by this obvious rehash of the first. Christ, it doesn't even have any spaceships or anything!!
jonsaan
18/03/08 @ 15:58
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Has COD4 raised the bar for online shooters?

oh yes.
bad09
18/03/08 @ 16:01
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The review does sum up my impressions on it. I was excited at first but the more I've seen the less excited I've become.

Probably will still get it just later and cheaper.
Baronen
18/03/08 @ 16:02
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh yawn. Fuck everyone who pays full price or this.
El_MUERkO
18/03/08 @ 16:03
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i'm thinking i might pick up the pc version
Wash
18/03/08 @ 16:05
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@jonsaan

How exactly?
t8yman
18/03/08 @ 16:05
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm buying it, I enjoyed the first, and even if this is short - the terrorist hunt mode can keep me busy for ages. granted COD4 will still take up 90% of my online time, but I am looking forward to thursday.
matrim83
18/03/08 @ 16:06
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Loved the first one. So this is a must buy for me.

How short is it though? Shorter than the first one?
syphaa
18/03/08 @ 16:07
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah the CO-OP/TH are fun, and I will still pick this up I reckon.
Gave me lots of time Online when the original came out.

COD4 has started getting a bit dry for me now, waiting on new maps.
Darren
18/03/08 @ 16:08
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yet another great review from EG in its thoroughness and it tells me everything I needed to know to *not* buy the game. Don't get me wrong, I thought the first Vegas was very good (offline, never played it online), especially the excellent cover system, but I got bored of playing long before the end so there's nothing in this "sequel" that makes me want to play it all again. As with many FPSs, it seems focused on the online multiplayer rather than the single player so it definitely isn't for me anyway.
asphaltcowboy
18/03/08 @ 16:23
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Loved the first one and the multiplayer was superb (Darren, you did yourself a disservice not trying it out!), so this should satisfy I think. I will pick this up at some point, but it would have been nice if it could have been a bit cheaper than normal!
SlackMaster
18/03/08 @ 16:35
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'll wait until this is cheap rather than paying full wack for it. I'll just play through the original and the derth of other games I have to keep me occupied until then.
rashes
18/03/08 @ 16:35
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
so, is there no support for 4 player co-op in the story mode?? Thats a huge huge dissapointment as that was one of the best features of the last one.

Still going to buy it for Terrorist Hunt + Attack and Defend and that canister one.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 18/03/08 @ 16:36
ElNino9
18/03/08 @ 16:38
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I loved the first one, so more of the same is fine by me.
BillyBrush
18/03/08 @ 16:38
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
jonsaan
18-Mar-08 15:58:21 Has COD4 raised the bar for online shooters?

oh yes.

Vegas 1 is better than COD4 online, as much adversarial, 4 player co op, 4 player terrorist hunts...and COD had a 4 hour campaign, people need to stop wetting their knickers over it already as Orange box is a better bunch of games anyway....

this however just sounds like Vegas1 all over again, it just looks exactly the same, they've just churned it out..
Darren
18/03/08 @ 16:38
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@asphaltcowboy - Sorry I don't like tactical online shooters, I find they get incredibly dull very quickly outside of a plot. I have tried R6V online but I didn't enjoy it I'm afraid. Not that there's anything wrong with it, it's just I'm not really a fan of online gaming, full-stop. I much prefer story-driven stuff with a beginning, a middle and an end.
Max_Powers
18/03/08 @ 16:39
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Dissapointing, as expected.

Multiplayer will probably work like a dog to, seeing as this is a Ubisoft game. Let me guess, no decent ranked matchmaking system (Halo3, CoD) but a 'pick your lobby' one that we all moved away from about 5 years ago?
DUFFKING
18/03/08 @ 16:43
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"How exactly?"

By containing men running around with guns shooting each other... oh. Never mind, it just plays a little differently and is a matter of preference instead.
Kiigan
18/03/08 @ 16:46
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As good as Lost then!
Gruff
18/03/08 @ 16:56
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the single player had always been meh

Co-op T Hunt makes this game.

Already despatched from ShopTo :-)
Apologie
18/03/08 @ 16:57
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As i said, far too many good shooter around for me to bother with these one...UT3 and COD4 will keep me entertained until Killzone2, Haze, RFOM:2, Far Cry 2 and Battelfield: Bad Company arrives.
mattigan
18/03/08 @ 17:00
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lost was good
HarryB
18/03/08 @ 17:08
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have this but not finished the first one yet. RAR!!
penhalion
18/03/08 @ 17:15
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I said a few weeks back that it looked so similar to the first one. I think I jokingly asked if the screenshots had been mixed up.....guess my initial reaction to this was right....ho-hum
beastmaster
18/03/08 @ 17:28
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Still not sure about this. I'm more in it for the multi-player. Had the first one and loved it. Got COD 4 but would like something else to have a go at online on the 360. Have Halo 3 but don't really play it that much. Is Ghost Recon 2 worth getting for the on-line?
DUFFMAN5
18/03/08 @ 17:31
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So I should get the first one (never played, but always meant to) and save some money ?
Xerx3s
18/03/08 @ 17:54
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Has COD4 raised the bar for online shooters?

oh yes. "

People keep saying that and while it has entertained me for 3 months, I really wonder what it innovated. The game was fun in MP yes but not earth shattering.
mooseman721
18/03/08 @ 18:04
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This will be worth buying just for terrorist hunt. I had the original and never once thought about getting rid until 360 died. If I still had the 360 I would still be playing R6V. I thought it was better than Gears, I will be picking up a copy of this, more of the same is fine.
penhalion
18/03/08 @ 18:05
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Xerx3s

Call of duty 4 raised the bar in terms of presentation and playability for multiplayer. I'd totally agree with you about it being nothing amazing or really special in the single player arena. I think Vegas 1 is still the most playable single player campaign for this type of game, even though technically it's third and not first person.

Having a game where a head shot on an enemy actually kills them as opposed to 20 head shots (gears stop hiding you know I'm talking about you!) was so refreshing and added immensely to the immersion factor. Especially as a head shot from an enemy was just as fatal.
Mike P
18/03/08 @ 18:07
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A buy for me.

I really enjoyed the first installment, and thought the online component was great. Much as I love COD4, once you've played a game with a really strong fire-from-cover mechanic it feels odd to play a "realistic" shooter that doesn't have it.

Oh and Baronen, maybe if you ask your mum & dad nicely if you can do some chores round the house they might give you a bit more pocket money. Bless.
TheNinkyNonk
18/03/08 @ 18:07
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well I did like the first one, but it does seem as though £10 off the RRP would've been a wise nod to the fans/consumer on the part of Ubi. I used to have a great deal of respect for them but that's changed over recent years.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 18/03/08 @ 18:13
Scimarad
18/03/08 @ 18:14
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I really hate to come across as 'Clancy Nerd' (especially as I'm not particularly a fan anymore) but isn't the organisation called Rainbow rather than Rainbow Six? I'm sure Rainbow Six was a certain Mr Clark's code name.

Wow, that was pedantic:-)

BobsUncle
18/03/08 @ 18:14
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Penhalion
"Having a game where a head shot on an enemy actually kills them..."

I guess you never played GRAW then? A headshot from ANY weapon (even a silenced pistol) will kill in GRAW.

"though technically it's third and not first person"

Not really, if you just let go of the controls it goes into 1st person mode, you actually have to interact and pull the trigger to make it go 3rd person. So really it is 1st person.


And I don't quite get what the reviewer is talking about with this new XP and character customisation system, it had all that in the first one anyway.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 18/03/08 @ 18:20
XdarXideX
18/03/08 @ 18:21
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good old Eurogamer... reviewing games with price and previous installments in mind. Sorry but regardless of the price this game is great fun (playing it right now) even if it has mostly the same kind of gameplay as the first Vegas. Price shouldn't be taken into account at all when it comes to judging the quality of the game. If it was £20 the game isn't BETTER for it... just awesome value for money.

I'm especially enjoying the fact I can now gain EXP by playing the campaign mode.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 18/03/08 @ 18:22
Apostle
18/03/08 @ 18:42
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sort of expected, but I've pre-ordered already and it's in the post. I know I'll enjoy it, but the real question is whether the multiplayer holds me enough to stop me going back to CoD4.
GitSomE UK
18/03/08 @ 19:06
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bargain bin buy for me this one and only if I haven't got anything else to do.
Crofto
18/03/08 @ 19:32
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow, this website is confusing.

You read a review for WoW with the score being 10... which automatically makes this website loose respect, and yet here's a review for a highly anticipated game getting a 7/10 (which seems accurate).

I dunno. All I can say is that I wish this website was more consistent with reviews.
Chufty
18/03/08 @ 19:38
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Meh. Couldn't even be bothered to try this at Play.com Live because it looked uninspired and shovelled.

It would be nice if EG could review the PC version of games like this though, when they talk about 'intuitive use of the d-pad' it worries me that the control system and responsivness might be consolenerfed.
gringohairpiece
18/03/08 @ 19:59
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well i'm getting it for £6 so not too bothered about the score. I really enjoyed the single player campaign in the last one and the online team terrorist hunt was awesome. So more of the same will be welcome
Edited 1 times, most recently on 18/03/08 @ 20:10
patchbox360
18/03/08 @ 19:59
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfN_cZqGA...

OH SHIT!!!!!!!!!!

p.s. only on ps3
Edited 1 times, most recently on 18/03/08 @ 20:00
krudster [mod]
18/03/08 @ 20:08
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To clarify, the ranking feature, while present in the previous Vegas, was only included in the multiplayer mode. The addition to all modes makes a big difference to how you play in single player I found.
Ajay
18/03/08 @ 20:10
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Any word on whether the PC version's been implemented properly this time around, or is it the same half-arsed "That'll do" monstrosity the first one was?
WiseNail
18/03/08 @ 20:19
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Loved the first one so I'm getting this (£35 from Amazon), so what if it's more of the same, it just means more of the same great gameplay as before. These forums make me laugh, loads of comments from supposed gamers always looking for reasons NOT to buy a game / console.

In the last few months I've played and enjoyed Bioshock, Orange Box, COD4, Halo 3, Metroid Prime 3, Unchartered, Stranglehold, Timeshift, Fear Files, Army of Two, The Club and Medal of Honor Airborne but I'll still find room for this before GTA4, MGS4 and Haze.
mainaman
18/03/08 @ 21:15
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
People buy semi-realistic shooters for MP.And the campaign is longer than COD4's.Beter mechanics and more customisation online than COD's MP as well.A must-buy for FPS fans.Still flawed,but not overpriced if you play online.
mainaman
18/03/08 @ 21:15
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
People buy semi-realistic shooters for MP.And the campaign is longer than COD4's.Beter mechanics and more customisation online than COD's MP as well.A must-buy for FPS fans.Still flawed,but not overpriced if you play online.
Res
18/03/08 @ 21:18
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wouldn't consider being able to switch to 3rd person to see around corners without the enemy being able to see you a better mechanic myself.
mainaman
18/03/08 @ 21:20
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
TPV is unrealistic,but i meant better movement and aiming.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 18/03/08 @ 21:20
Retroid [mod]
18/03/08 @ 21:41
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Six hours for the single player?

FUCK YOU UBISOFT
tapper
18/03/08 @ 22:10
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I remember when Rainbow 6 was known as quality tactical shooters.

Comments: 1-50 of 83 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery