Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Tom Clancy's HAWX Review

Xbox 360 PC PlayStation 3 Review by Richard Leadbetter

5 March, 2009

Page 2 of 2. <- Page 1

On Xbox 360 (the version reviewed), overall impressions of the graphics remain highly favourable throughout, especially in light of Ubisoft's attempts to run the game at a full-on 60fps with anti-aliasing set to the max. There's sporadic jerkiness (especially evident with the thankfully-not-used-much cockpit view) but the overall impression is that it looks smooth and the control response is crisp and effective.

You can expect a comparison with the PS3 version in the next Eurogamer Face-Off. But based on what we've played of the demo (check out the tech analysis over on the Digital Foundry blog), initial impressions are that it's another decent conversion from Ubisoft: better than 360 in some places, worse in others.

Online options include a drop-in, drop-out co-op mode that sees the single-player campaign mission segue into quad-gamer mayhem - something I enjoyed it a great deal. There's a real sense that you and your wingmen are up against impossible odds. While a co-ordinated strategy reaps obvious dividends, going your own way Maverick-style remains a viable option; not a bad thing when so many online games see you teamed up with a bunch of non-communicative strangers.

While this doesn't make for an experience with a massive amount of depth, there's a real sense you're taking part in a larger-scale conflict. Supplementing this is the 16-player Deathmatch mode: fun as far as it goes (especially with the mode-specific support weaponry) but an option with limited longevity.

The good thing about the online options as they stand is that any kill in any mode counts towards your XP total. As in Call of Duty 4, the more points you have, the more prizes you have access to: in this case, bonus planes to fly and more weapon payload configurations. There are 40 levels to attain, and a run-through of the single-player game in normal mode got me up to level 20.

'Tom Clancy's HAWX' Screenshot 1

Although online is very entertaining, you can't help but feel that it could've offered so much more. The player vs. player options are limited (although at least one more gameplay variation is coming via DLC along with bonus plane packs), and a full-on HAWX vs Artemis spin on the campaign mode is sorely missing.

The more you play HAWX - whether online, or in single-player - the more you get the sense that although it has the nucleus of something special, there is a huge amount of potential yet to be realised. First up is the vast array of planes and weapons selections on offer. All good, and satisfying to unlock, but the default plane and payload options are always more than enough to take down the threat of each campaign.

There's no sense of there being much of a tangible advantage in gaining all this extra stuff. This is a shame because it's the key to the game's longevity - the single-player campaign is over quickly (around 8-10 hours in normal mode) and it should be the lure of further unlockables that brings you back.

'Tom Clancy's HAWX' Screenshot 2

The planes themselves are also much of a muchness, exhibiting little in the way of unique features. I'd expect the F-117 stealth fighter to handle like a dog, but it doesn't. I'd also expect it to be somewhat immune to radar, but it isn't. Any and all of the stealth fighters in the game seem to act very similarly to the more standard aircraft. Bearing in mind the decades of technological advances in the various aircraft HAWX offers, this is a surprise and a disappointment. The Clancy franchise should be synonymous with tactical depth and intelligent gaming, but here the gameplay feels homogenised and dumbed down.

Take HAWX for what it is, not what you want it to be or what it could have been, and you have a game that's certainly enjoyable to play, especially online. Ace Combat fans will love it, so it's a good job this title is compatible with the Namco game's bespoke flight sticks.

But in essence, HAWX is a victim of the high standards set by the other titles in the Clancy franchise. Games such as EndWar and Ghost Recon manage to strike a balance between being fun to play, while offering real challenge and depth of gameplay. This game doesn't, and as a result it's hard to recommend it as a must-buy.

6/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Tom Clancy's HAWX on PC/PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 75 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Law07
05/03/09 @ 13:56
#1
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
lol
aphexstwin
05/03/09 @ 13:57
#2
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
you twat. i was gunna be first but had to log in!

2nded!!!
Quint2020
05/03/09 @ 13:58
#3
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I called it.
rarebit
05/03/09 @ 13:58
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
is the expression 'meh'? yes...yes... i think it is.
Genji
05/03/09 @ 14:02
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I somehow read the title as "Tony HAWX something or other".

Looked at the pictures, and thought "shit, this doesn't have anything to do with skating anymore"
aphexstwin
05/03/09 @ 14:03
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
not as good as ace combat for me. the sat scans werent all that good and its another tom clancy scifi shooter with wings. all the clancy games are getting scifi these days tbh
RexRunti
05/03/09 @ 14:06
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Come back Freespace 2, all is forgiven.
Physically_Insane
05/03/09 @ 14:10
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Aw, I really wanted to buy this. Oh well...
Dr_Wadd
05/03/09 @ 14:14
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've tried the demo of this, and the third-person viewpoint when you go into assistance off mode pretty much kills any chance there would have been of me buying this. I found it totally detracts from the concept of it being a flight combat game.
SEVQA
05/03/09 @ 14:17
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was in two minds about this - now my mind is made up!

No purchase!
porkman
05/03/09 @ 14:18
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Played the demo and with all Jet fighter type games you end up firing at dots. WW2 and WW1 are much better for flight games.
bonker
05/03/09 @ 14:19
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I can't help but pre-emptively facepalm any "Tom Clancy"" stuff these days - not the best franchise in the world this I fear ... (Unless it's just me!)
Ceatlan
05/03/09 @ 14:19
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I agree Dr_Wadd, in the demo I found the distant 3rd person point of view complete useless. All of sudded instead of playing 3D combat flight game I was playing an old school 2D shooter similar to time pilots, except with a pseudo depth which you had no real perception of because of the distance you were away. It completely ruined what had started out feeling like a great flight combat game.
steoc4
05/03/09 @ 14:24
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I actually had a lot of fun with the demo. There are better games out there but this is something I'll want to pick up when the price drops in future.
seasidebaz
05/03/09 @ 14:26
#15
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Boo!
OllyJ
05/03/09 @ 14:26
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I would like to get this but yeah that assistance camera made it hard for me to control....
PearOfAnguish
05/03/09 @ 14:29
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Adding to the allure is the guiding presence of master storyteller Tom Clancy"

Tom Clancy's involvement with this game started when he received the royalty cheque and ended the day he cashed it in at the bank.
asphaltcowboy
05/03/09 @ 14:32
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I quite enjoyed the demo. Review seemed so positive right up until the score :/
Anthony_UK
05/03/09 @ 14:32
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmmm is it better than Ace Combat then?

Also is the 6/10 partly because it's not Ghost Recon in the air? For me the Tom Clancy name used to mean you knew were getting a semi realistic war game of some shape or form, so sticking the same badge on a very arcadey flight sim doesn't sit well with me as enjoyable as it was...... But at the same time, I'd like to think the game wasn't marked down because of that reason.
Crofto
05/03/09 @ 14:35
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
*Copy and pastes post from the Bikini Squad comments*

What, no 10/10?

WTF

---

Ubi-Soft will be angry at you people... maybe that explains why the 404-Not Found message is displaying in the usual advertisement spots for me? ;oP

I know I know... you'll make up for it by overrating some shitty Ubi-Soft tagged title in the future... I get it.
seasidebaz
05/03/09 @ 14:37
#21
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Crofto:

My reckoning is they'll score Beyond Good & Evil 2 marks above what it should get. Then balance will be restored :D
UncleLou
05/03/09 @ 14:45
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I liked the external cameral once I used the much better "expert" controls.

I don't see how you'd let that mode put you off buying this even if you don't like it though, it's not like you need to use it (except in the tutorial) - provided you like the game from the cockpit/behind plane perspective, of course.

For me, it's a buy. It's essentially Ace Combat (which I love) with a more sterile presentation, but a nice etxra mode for pretty airplane ballet.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 05/03/09 @ 14:51
thelatestmodel
05/03/09 @ 14:45
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Adding to the allure is the guiding presence of master storyteller Tom Clancy"

Tom Clancy's involvement with this game started when he received the royalty cheque and ended the day he cashed it in at the bank."


This.

Really disappointed with the demo and won't be buying it. I'm a flight sim fan, but I do like arcade flying games as well. This just isn't a good game.
VicViper
05/03/09 @ 14:50
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@seasidebaz

BG&E2 will get the marks it deserves, I hope, if the can make it equal or better than the original then happy days.

Well doesn't look I'll be abandoning ace combat series in my top Arcade Dog fighter games.
Widge
05/03/09 @ 14:53
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't like middle ground games, make my flying games like Afterburner!
marilena
05/03/09 @ 14:57
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"My reckoning is they'll score Beyond Good & Evil 2 marks above what it should get. Then balance will be restored :D"

So, BG&E 2 will get a 12/10? That would be something!
UltimateWarrior
05/03/09 @ 15:05
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Really like this review. I like the way videos explaining certain points are included within the text. More of this please Eurogamer.
Artemis_Matsas
05/03/09 @ 15:06
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ok, so it's official: If a game does not attract a positive review from a given site, then the review gets postponed until the official release.

brilliant strategy.
OllyJ
05/03/09 @ 15:12
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Uncle lou

Because you can't do the fancy tricks in normal view, I don't understand why I should ever be taken out of the cockpit view...???

WHY?
UncleLou
05/03/09 @ 15:15
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Did you really feel in any way limited in the cockpit perspective?

You can essentially do the same trick. Brake, turn the plane around. Where's the problem?
kinky_mong
05/03/09 @ 15:15
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Crofto: That's three comments section in a row I've read where you've made some "chip on your shoulder" comment about Eurogamer's review scores. It prompted me to read your bio on your profile and after the laughter had subsided I formed the impression that you are quite a pathetic individual.

Good day.
rauper [staff]
05/03/09 @ 15:15
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
artemis: We posted the review as soon as we could, but we didn't get code until later than usual - nothing sinister going on regarding timing from our perspective.
galerian86
05/03/09 @ 15:16
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't think HAWX is a flight sim. More like going for arcade flight game. You don't have to worry about ammo that much, and pulling off stunts is a breeze. From the demo that I played, it is decent!
UncleLou
05/03/09 @ 15:18
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"It prompted me to read your bio on your profile and after the laughter had subsided I formed the impression"

Heh, excellent. Cheers for pointing that out. :D
Katsumoto
05/03/09 @ 15:27
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lol yeah i've read that profile before too, I was almost in tears. Classic stuff.
MyPointIs
05/03/09 @ 15:27
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You can count another one who was completely baffled by the anyoing 3rd person pseudo 2D camera the demo IMPOSED on you to play. It does NOT work.
UncleLou
05/03/09 @ 15:35
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Imposed in the tutorial.
Chtulie
05/03/09 @ 15:47
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No love for 'Secret Weapons over Normandy' in the intro?
autogunner
05/03/09 @ 15:47
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i loved the demo but could not complete the TUTORIAL as the bots that tailed you were so hard i spend most of the time dodging missiles.

I think the ERS and assistance off modes work to an extent, although ERS is a bit of a winbutton.
Ceatlan
05/03/09 @ 15:48
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
UncleLou,

So they lost a sale because the demo screwed my opinion. Why should I bother any further, its not like I normally buy games where I disliked the demo. The tutorial definitely gave me the opinion that it was a major part of the game, and I stopped playing almost as soon as that part started. Its not my job to try to like games, its the demo and tutorials part to sell the game to me. I have more than enough things to do with my spare time to not waste it further on things that are trying there hardest to put me off.

Maybe I'll give it a second chance based on your comments here, but maybe not. It might be an example of a bad demo spoiling a potentially good game.


Edited 2 times, most recently on 05/03/09 @ 15:50
UncleLou
05/03/09 @ 15:53
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I really don't care if you buy it or not. I was just pointing out a factual error in your post.

I simply don't get why people complain about a voluntary feature they don't need to use (which is pretty obvious if you play the "real" mission instead of just the tutorial).

By all means, don't play the game because it is too arcadey or whatever, but stop it with the "the external camera ruined it" posts.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/03/09 @ 15:54
RedSparrows
05/03/09 @ 15:54
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Kinky, ta for pointing out Crofto's profile, it's always fun to read something so un-self-aware. :D
Dr_Wadd
05/03/09 @ 16:00
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ UncleLou, I didn`t get around to playing the mission proper and see there if I could avoid the third-person camera, so thanks for the heads-up, I shall give it another go, although if it does change my mind I`m not sure my bank manager will thank you ;)
farticusmaximus
05/03/09 @ 16:00
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@UncleLou

In fairness, it's not made clear that the external view is not mandatory during the game. I switched off after a few minutes of being in external view but would have carried on if I had known.

In fact I'll go back and give it another shot tonight armed with that knowledge.
Ceatlan
05/03/09 @ 16:03
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
UncleLou,

Sorry I was not trying to be inflammatory or even agressive in my post. I was just trying to point out how dangerous a demo/tutorial can be. I didn't even try the real mission because after I encountered the distant 3rd person part of the tutorial I was just so astounded that anyone thought something like that could be a good idea in a flight combat game, especially as to me it seemed like the tutorial was making a big thing out of how cool it was and how important it was to the game. I pretty much stopped right away after that. Now if it is really not a big part of the game and you don't actually have to resort to using it at all, I may give the demo another go, but it definitely shows how dangerous demos can be.


Edited 2 times, most recently on 05/03/09 @ 16:04
PearOfAnguish
05/03/09 @ 16:06
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh no, please tell me that Crofto bio is a joke.
UncleLou
05/03/09 @ 16:10
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Don't worry, you didn't really sound aggressive. I am afraid I do, sorry about that, but I have an extremely annoying bellyache today which I can put the blame on!

But really, try the "normal" mission - you can easily finish it without ever using the assistance off mode.

Though as I said earlier, if you haven't, try the assistance off mode with the "expert" controls as well. They're the same then as in the cockpit, as instead of being simplifiedm but different, which just ended up confusing me. Whether you're liking them or not (I do, because it really looks extra-ordinarily pretty), I think a developer that obviously has put some thought into a new feature, and has made it non-mandatory no less, deserves some credit rather than so many "it's ruined" comments. Not just here but also in the forum, and on RPS, so having to repeat for the 10th time today that you don't need to use them made me a bit grumpy. :)
marilena
05/03/09 @ 16:33
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Heh, Lou, you seem to have convinced one bunch of people, now you only have 13758 Internet forums to go!

Good luck with that :P.
bad09
05/03/09 @ 16:39
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought the demo was fun, I really liked the 3rd person view, along with the missile cam it made some great scenes!

Might pick this up, especially now I know a flight stick is out next week to! I haven't used one since that old PS1 dual stick monster!

/ puts on flight jacket and shades listens to take my breath away......
Anthony_UK
05/03/09 @ 16:43
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The unassisted 3rd person view is alot more easier to use set to normal rather than advanced. Set to normal, pressing the stick left, will simply make you plane turn left rather than barreling roll on itself.

I found it strange at first untill attacked a tank in the middle of some buildings, heading directly up at the sky over the target, then switching to unassisted mode, pulling back on the stick and braking (making the plane stall and flip over on itself almost stopping in mid air) then switching to assist on, firing up the engines and unleashing a couple of missiles at the tank now directly below me.

/damn just sold it to myself
/hates posting on my iPhone (mercy grammar police)
Edited 2 times, most recently on 05/03/09 @ 16:50

Comments: 1-50 of 75 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery