The Witcher to be re-released Comments by Robert Purchese
Completely polished this time.
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Comments: 1-39 of 39 in total
Poster
|
Clive Dunn
19/02/08 @ 12:09
0
/reads first paragraph
Pauses for 45 seconds whilst loading /continues to second paragraph, gets halfway though...loads again doh. |
|
MouzerMalti
19/02/08 @ 12:37
0
I had borrowed the game from a friend and was discouraged by the numerous crashes I used to have.
Now that the real FINAL version is about to be introduced, I think I'll give it a shot... :) |
|
QPRHOOPS81
19/02/08 @ 12:39
0
i got this game (15 quid bargain) last week. Loading times arent to bad (though im using 1.3 patch not the original). Would be good to have more dialogue though. Im really enjoying it at the moment and am on the second section. Will be cool if they give all the fixes/updates away for free though i bet not everything will be given away.
|
|
SentientNr6
19/02/08 @ 12:43
0
Enjoying the raw version. I am halfway through act II and it keeps getting better.
I reread the review on eurogamer and can't help but wonder how far the reviewer played. eg. Combat This is indeed weird the first hours but it grows on you. Now I can actually experiment and get better at it. You learn to use different tactics for different enemies. I don't see which RPG does a better job actually. Rigid Dialogue. I kinda like this. Hey you're playing Geralt not a politically correct dogoodie. This makes for some funnier dialogues than standard RPG issue. I forgot to mention that loading times are also ok on my system. Probably one of the patches fixed this.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 19/02/08 @ 12:44
|
|
JediMasterMalik
19/02/08 @ 13:03
0
This will improve the game no end, I suppose this is in response to fans, as a lot of the complaints are similar, and seem to be fixed for this release. I adored the game and thought it was one of the best RPGs in a very long time. This will definitely make me go back to it.
|
|
JediMasterMalik
19/02/08 @ 13:34
0
Stupidest comment ever. The same idiotic insult could apply to almost any PC game. Shockingly, many PC games use the mouse. Confusing, I know.
|
|
0
Stupidest comment ever. The same idiotic insult could apply to almost any PC game. Shockingly, many PC games use the mouse. Confusing, I know.
Well, I usually use keys as well... but that’s beside the point, as I wasn't insulting it, just merely making an observation. You have to admit there was a lot of (excess) clicking used in combat. And anyway, I wouldn't say it was the stupidest comment ever (maybe forth or fifth) but not THE stupidest comment ever in the existence of stupid comments. Perhaps you should read EG more? ;) EDIT:spelling :)
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 19/02/08 @ 13:55
|
|
subtlesnake
19/02/08 @ 14:08
0
You only had to click once between each combo, so I wouldn't say it involved more clicking than your typical FPS.
|
|
0
I guess it IS just me then. :)
There probably was an auto-attack option so you didn't have to click every time for your bog-standard attack? Leaving you free to counter attacks with the mouse and use magic using hotkeys? Oh and because WASD was a joke, clicking was really the only viable option for moving.. so i guess that emphasised it a little... The FPS comparison isn't really that accurate... unless you just stand there like a lemon when an NPC attacks and you just single-click the mouse? There was a brilliantly funny review by zero punctuation on elitist magazine hi-lighting the same flaws that I got hung up on, but I cant post the link as the site seems to be down :( I didn’t think it was a bad game by any means, I just don’t think it was the holy grail of PC RPGs that everyone seems to think it is. :) |
|
0
WASD was hard odd to use at first but after an hour or so I found it easy to move around. I thought clicking was well used and while it had flaws it was a great game.
I certainly didn't think I was over clicking, but then again I am a big plot fan so I spent a lot of time investigating various plot angles, talking to people rather than just moving from enemy to enemy. |
|
0
I ditched the mouse-movement for wasd, because it actually felt more natural.. after getting used to it for a while though.
But about clickfest- come on, diablo is a clickfest. Here, you click, wait Geralt do his magic, then click again- about 1 time per second, sometimes you have to wait even more. It aint that bad, you know. |
|
FlamingCarrot
19/02/08 @ 14:54
0
On Act V and i still love it. These enhancements are hopefully going to make it even more enjoyable.
|
|
SentientNr6
19/02/08 @ 15:09
0
how many times do i have to click to win in this version
Well if you play to win you're missing something |
|
fiery_jackass
19/02/08 @ 16:35
0
heh, I'd been trying to get to Yahtzee's review for the same purpose, Zulu.
He's the only reviewer I've properly cared about since Digitiser |
|
0
Great, they waited until I got through what I pray is the worst of the game (Acts 1 and 2) before improving. The impending patch is a nice excuse to put off finishing this a bit longer; just wish it wasn't hogging up 9G of HDD. Now I'm into Act 3 and I see some signs of hope for this game (just enough to belabor the misery really) but I still think the zeropunctuation review is on the money.
|
|
john_silence
20/02/08 @ 11:39
0
Man I love these guys. I currently play it from Metaboli, but I might well buy this enhanced version for the extras.
|
Comments: 1-39 of 39 in total
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Advertisement
