The Making of World of Warcraft
Part One: From concept to launch.
Eleven million players. Two expansions. $1.2 billion a year in revenue. 16GB of your hard disk. Billions of hours played. Acres of news-print. A Sam Raimi-directed movie in the works. A billion-dollar grey market in gold and items. An episode of South Park. Therapists creating in-game characters for addiction counselling. Eleven million players.
The sheer magnitude of World of Warcraft is staggering. There's nothing else like it in videogaming, a fact which makes perfect sense to its players - but is frankly baffling to non-players, and those who don't understand the appeal of the online worlds presented by massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs, or simply MMOs). Perhaps because WOW is so huge, so impossible to ignore, it polarises opinions.
Yet all of this can sometimes serve to obscure the most important thing about World of Warcraft. Strip away the hype, the numbers, the media coverage and the debate, and what you're left with is simply a superb game. A game crafted with skill, love and obsessive perfectionism by an exceptionally talented team at the company that built it, Blizzard Entertainment.
If we want to talk about that game - rather than the baggage it has accumulated over the years - it makes sense to go all the way back to the beginning.
World of Warcraft first popped into public view in September, 2001. Blizzard executive Bill Roper had flown into London to make an announcement at the ECTS trade show. Anticipation was high. The already legendary studio had revealed its (as yet unreleased) strategy game Warcraft III at ECTS two years previously, and the announcement of a new Blizzard game was a big deal. Even then, the studio was known for doing few games, very slowly - and very, very well. The smart money was on a sequel to its other strategy hit, StarCraft.

An early sketch of a gnoll [left] defined the look of the game, says Didier.
It wasn't StarCraft II. That afternoon, Roper announced a whole new direction for Blizzard - the company was going to make a massively multiplayer game, letting people roam the Warcraft world as their own characters. Three playable races - humans, orcs and the bull-like tauren - were revealed, and each was going to be fundamentally different. You would be able to play from first-person, third-person or zoomed-out, isometric perspectives.
The reaction was mixed. There was excitement and intrigue, certainly, but there was also a sense of confusion - even disappointment. Why would Blizzard, a strategy-gaming giant, be choosing to muck around with this niche genre? Didn't they know how few people played MMOs? Did they understand what they were getting themselves into?
"It felt like a natural progression," recalls Blizzard's grandly-titled vice president of creative development, Chris Metzen, casting his mind back almost a decade. "We had been working on Warcraft III or different iterations of it for a couple of years at the point when we really started to think about World of Warcraft, and a lot of the creative vision really translated from the Warcraft III experience."

It took a bit longer to get murlocs right, however.
Sam ("Samwise") Didier, the company's art director, interjects. "I'm not sure if this is exactly where it started - but at one time, we had a behind-the-character camera in Warcraft III, much like you see in WOW now. We were thinking of a slightly different, RTS-slash-RPG vibe for the game.
"We ended up going back more to the RTS side, but I remember seeing those first builds of the game: you're running around with the Archmage or the Blademaster, right behind him. You see the horizon, and the enemy camps in front... I think that helped to establish the feeling that, wow, our game would look awesome like this."
It wasn't just this natural progression, however, that inspired World of Warcraft. It helped that the team was spending a lot of time playing certain other games.
"It's funny," admits Metzen, "at the time a lot of us were playing [early MMOs] EverQuest and Ultima Online... Well, we had a secondary development team working on an unannounced project, which we thought was cool, although it was still taking shape - but given that we were such fans of games like EverQuest, the discussion at the time was, well, maybe we can do one of these!"
Playing EverQuest did more than just inspire Blizzard - it helped with hiring, too. Rob Pardo, vice president of game design, had been involved in running a well-known EverQuest guild called Legacy of Steel alongside another player, called Tigole, who was noted in the community for posting incisive commentary on EverQuest on the guild website. Hired by Blizzard, Tigole - real name Jeff Kaplan - would go on to become one of the lead designers on World of Warcraft, and a key figure in the genesis of the game.
Blizzard would soon learn that playing and talking about EverQuest was a world away from actually building its own MMO.
"We knew that it was a mammoth undertaking, but I think, at the time, we had no clue just how big and complex something like this would be," Metzen says now. "Perhaps it was a little bit of naiveté - 'oh yeah, we can bang out one of those, no big deal' - and certainly as we got into it, we would learn that these things are just... very, very complex in their scope."
Even the initial vision for the game wasn't entirely clear. When work started on World of Warcraft, the team wasn't sure of many things, including when it would be set and what it would look like. Many early concepts were much darker and more gothic than the cartoony look that's now so familiar.
"For a good stretch of the early period of WOW, certain components of the dev team had pitched the idea of placing WOW a hundred years in the future of [Warcraft's world] Azeroth," Metzen reveals. "The wars of orcs and humans were long-done, it was a much darker game. At the end of the day, there was a lot of cool art churned out - and this is a little-known story - but as we stood back and looked at it, we just felt that there was a disconnect. It didn't feel like Azeroth."

The interface as it might have been.
Didier takes up the story. "We'd been trying some different things," he says. "We were pushing it a few years ahead, into the future of the world, or rearranging the way that some of the characters would look - and it just wasn't biting for a lot of people. It's like changing Darth Vader from a big scary death knight in the future into a small child. Oh, never mind, sorry, they did that already," he jokes.
"Basically, what happened was that one of the artists on the team just took the Gnoll character from Warcraft III and made it look good at the camera angle that we were using. He kept the same proportions, the same bright colours, the same silhouette with the exaggerated features - and we all looked at that and said, yes, this is what World of Warcraft is going to look like.
"Then he proceeded and did the Kobold, and from then on, that was... Well, it was like, why are we trying to reinvent this thing? Everyone loves Warcraft - let's just make this Warcraft. We don't need any futuristic spin on it, or scary versions of this character, compared to the Warcraft III one. Just make it Warcraft III - that's what the fans are going to love."

Tauren were one of the first confirmed races alongside humans and orcs.
The look, which Metzen describes as "equal parts epic and cartoony", is defining - and it allowed a game with what he freely admits "wasn't necessarily the greatest engine you'd ever seen" to achieve a visual style that could survive years in the spotlight. "Any game will age," he says, "but there's something timeless and Disney-ish about WOW's look. That was a funny secondary benefit of really embracing the Warcraft III look - something it bought us which we hadn't anticipated."
As development on World of Warcraft progressed, the team's lack of MMO experience must have started to make itself felt. Blizzard advertised for designers with experience of the field - a relatively small pool of people in the early part of this decade. One of those people was Tom Chilton, who had previously worked on Ultima Online.
Now a lead designer on World of Warcraft, Chilton recalls that while big questions like the art style or the setting may not have been locked down from the outset, certain game philosophies had been there right from day one.
"One of the core philosophies for the game was that World of Warcraft was going to be more accessible," he says. "That was absolutely a philosophy right from the beginning, before I even came to the team. It was going to be easier to get into, it wasn't going to have the kind of foibles that other MMOs had. There wasn't going to be experience loss on death - that sort of thing."
Other ideas which became vital parts of the WOW experience took longer to crystallise. "The idea that you'd have something to do all the time and the quest-driven nature of the game is something that evolved - it wasn't one of the early philosophies," Chilton recalls. "We built these awesome starting zones, places like Northshire Valley and Elwynn Forest - and then, as we continued to do zones after that, the quests just tapered off. We actually originally expected the game to go into more of an EverQuest-style free-form, where you go out there and you fight monsters until you get to the next level.
"What we found was that all the feedback that we got from our alpha testers was that once they ran out of quests, the game got boring. They were like, 'I don't know what to do any more, and I don't really feel like playing any more once I run out of quests'. We came to that realisation that, wow, this quest thing really works. We need to do this throughout the entire game!"

In the end, these beefy troll models were replaced and wouldn't reappear until the Burning Crusade.
For Metzen, who oversees the fiction of all of Blizzard's worlds, the focus on quests was the solution to a problem he'd grappled with since the start of the project - how to tell stories in the static, restrictive world of an MMORPG. "It was a bit frustrating early on," he confesses. "We were so far out of our comfort zone, constructing something we'd never attempted before - this idea of having to create a static world. It was constraining, not being able to chase a more organic, player-specific story."
"At the end of the day, we concluded that if it does have to be more static, then we sure as hell better input as much heart and character and humour and flavour into the quest experience as we possibly can. It's frustrating as a story guy, sure, because the broad player experience is essentially on a track - but what games like this allow for is the sheer scope of the world, the breadth of the kingdoms and the races, with their own internal strife and their own internal stories, the overarching villains as well as the regional conflicts...
"It was such a big project that needed so much story - so I always felt even if we couldn't get there in terms of unique player experiences, we certainly built something that has tidal waves of story. We felt pretty good about the sheer scope."

Early versions of the game had few quests beyond the starter zones.
Quests became the basic component of the World of Warcraft experience - a decision rooted equally in gameplay and storytelling, Metzen argues. "It keeps you immersed, it keeps a carrot in front of you, it leads your sense of exploration. We wanted story to be the vehicle through which you experience the world, as opposed to chasing down monsters in a field and exploring the world by going from A to Z and getting lost. That was the paradigm in early MMOs - you would simply head out, and if you found yourself in a place that was above your level, you got clobbered and learned not to go there."
The quests delivered another element of gameplay which the team hadn't expected. "We called it the Christmas Tree Effect," Metzen recalls, chuckling. "You walked into a new town, and suddenly there were five or six characters standing around who all had these big gold exclamation points. There's something very rewarding about that - like, ooh! Check it out! There's all sorts of stuff for me to do here! In a purely videogame way, as simple as Mario jumping to catch a coin, that felt really good. It created a fun player emotion."
Chilton joined the team a year before World of Warcraft would launch in North America. He was thrilled to be working for Blizzard, a company he had been a fan of for years - but with 12 months to go, the amount of work left to do on the game was daunting, to say the least.
"I was very surprised by how much stuff hadn't been done," he recalls, laughing. "I arrived and I was like, oh my god! We have to do how much more? We have how long to do it?!"
Not only was the game lacking in content - the level cap at this time was level 15, with little more than unfinished artwork existing for the higher-level zones - but decisions still had to be made about major game systems. "It was still very rough and nebulous about what a lot of the [character] classes would do," Chilton remembers. "A lot of classes were being redesigned, and our entire combat system got redesigned some time after I came on board.
"Huge numbers of game systems didn't exist. The talent system didn't exist, so there wasn't a lot of distinction between characters of the same class, other than what hair or moustache you'd picked. The auction house and the mail system didn't exist. PvP [player-versus-player combat] didn't exist and none of the endgame ideas had been evolved - we knew that we wanted to have raids, but that's all we knew. There was still a ton of WOW that hadn't been built and wasn't really known."
The final twelve months, then, were defined not only by frantic work to get the game into a complete state - but also by a succession of "eureka" moments, as the team hit upon the ideas and solutions that would turn World of Warcraft into the game it is today.

Imagine a world where raids weren't instanced and it was every guild for itself. Blizzard came close to making it reality.
Chilton fondly recalls some of those milestones. "When we finally settled on what the talent system was going to be, that was pretty defining for us," he says. "Before that, there wasn't enough character differentiation. People didn't feel different enough from everybody else. The talent system made a big difference in terms of how people felt invested in their character.
"A eureka moment for our itemisation was when we came to the conclusion that if we were to split stats up on an item, we needed to increase the total stat budget for the item. It sounds like an arcane or a really nerdy thing, but it was a big deal, because we were struggling with how to get people not to just collect items of the same stat. How do you make warriors want items that aren't just pure strength, for example? It was a decision that has defined the way our itemisation works ever since."
Other big decisions were more contentious with the rest of team. The large-scale dungeon raids that characterise an MMO endgame were the topic of many discussions, with everything from the cap on the number of players (figures from 20 to 100 were batted around, with 40 being eventually settled upon) to the question of instancing being argued about passionately.

Blizzard had to cut Battlegrounds from the original release, meaning the only place to fight was out in the open.
Instancing - separating the dungeons from the world itself, so that teams of players could work through them without interruption from other players - turned out to be especially controversial. "Oh yeah, that was a really hot topic," Chilton says. "At some points we even had the idea that some raids wouldn't be instanced and others would be. We were really torn - we wanted to capture the magic of guilds racing towards server firsts, and that sort of thing."
The decision, in the end, went back to WOW's core philosophy of accessibility. "As we thought about it more and more, we really felt like people had an expectation of being able to do the content," he explains. "We would still be able to get some of that feeling of people getting server firsts - they didn't necessarily have to be denying each other access to content in order to be able to do that."
What Chilton remembers as the single most contentious issue, however, was the split between the Horde and Alliance factions - with the sides not only competing against one another, but being prevented from communicating with each other.
"That was contentious right up until the time we launched," he recalls. "The team was pretty divided on that. Jeff Kaplan was pretty against it - he would ask what the point was in splitting up the player-base. People are going to want to play with, well, the people they want to play with!
"Allen Adham, who was the original lead designer, was very adamant that the split was going ahead, because we needed to break the game into teams. If we wanted to have a PvP game, we would want it to be team-based - in a lot of ways, it was like Dark Age of Camelot had done. I was on board with the idea, because I felt like that was one of the advantages that DAOC had over Ultima Online, which I'd worked on.
"DAOC had pre-determined teams, you were either Albion or Hibernia or, er, the other one. Players were split into those teams, and they felt like they were a part of something. It automatically meant that you had people who were friendly to you and willing to help you, who you could join up with - and you know who the bad guys were. In Ultima Online, while not having those boundaries was interesting, it was a huge hurdle for players. People didn't feel like part of anything - they didn't know who their friends were, who they were supposed to be fighting against, what they were supposed to do.
"It was very cool for really hardcore players who could organise themselves into guilds and essentially create their own teams, but it was very intimidating for new players. The split was the right thing to do for WOW, in a spirit of wanting accessible PvP that felt like Warcraft. Eventually Jeff Kaplan came around to the idea - within the last year or so - but right up to launch, there were still people on the team that were opposed to the concept."

A scene all low-level Horde players in the early days of the game will remember - but prefer to forget.
As the launch date for the game approached, the team knew that some sacrifices were going to have to be made in order to get WOW into players' hands. "We had discussions," Metzen remembers, "about whether, if we wanted to get this thing out before we all had grandchildren, we would have to pull back, or scale back conceptually."
Scaling back on the game's ideas wouldn't have fit with the Blizzard way. Instead, some areas were pushed back to be dealt with after release. One of those was PvP - which, when the game launched, was much more rudimentary than the team had planned.
"Everyone on the team wanted PvP in the game," says Chilton, "but we just had this nebulous idea of what it was going to be. We knew that the general philosophy was that we wanted it to be Warcraft III meets Battlefield 1942. A Battlefield perspective, and an action sort of feel, with the epic warfare of Warcraft III - and that was it. That was all we knew. The team was behind the vision, it was just a question of how to accomplish that vision.
"We hadn't really resolved that by the time we launched World of Warcraft. All we had when the game launched was the ability for people to flag themselves as PvP and then fight it out for the sake of fighting it out - then we had PvP servers where people were automatically flagged in the contested territories. That's all we had time to implement by the time we launched."

WOW finally took flight in November 2004.
As the launch date approached, Chilton wondered to himself what kind of subscriber numbers the game would do. "I did feel that we had the best MMO out and that we would do better than other games - I thought that 750,000 to a million, something like that, would have been the upper boundary of what an MMO could achieve. Others anticipated more than that, but..."
They would soon find out if their predictions - and their years of hard work - would be worth anything. World of Warcraft's North American launch date was set: November 23rd, 2004. From that date, for Blizzard, everything would change.
In Part Two: the aftermath of the launch, managing the success of the game, and the lessons learned from WOW's early years and expansion packs.
You may also like...
-
Tera: beta dates and pre-order bonuses
-
SWTOR patch 1.1.2: notes, on test realm
-
Russia and CIS regions blocked from Tera's European servers
-
Rift endless free trial arrives under a year after launch
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
Mobile Controller Group Test
-
The Story Behind XBLA's Biggest Game
-
Retrospective: Grim Fandango
-
Game of the Week: SoulCalibur 5
-
Why Do Developers Give Away Their Games For Free?
-
The Darkness 2 Review
-
Valve makes Portal 2 Space Core mod for Skyrim
-
App of the Day: Armed!
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Review
-
Official Mass Effect 3 Xbox 360 and PS3 console mods revealed
-
Mutant Mudds Review
-
Killzone 1 for PlayStation 3 "delayed indefinitely"
-
Sony improves PlayStation 3 web browser with system update v4.10
-
Mass Effect 3 gets From Dust day-one DLC
-
Vodafone 3G Vita offers free WipEout and 4GB memory
-
Ubisoft apologises after online server switch snafu
-
Massive Square Enix sale hits Xbox Live
-
Square Enix makes Sleeping Dogs official
-
Skyrim gets high-res PC texture pack
-
The Simpsons Arcade on EU PlayStation Store today









Comments (42) Latest comment 2 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Been playing since day 1 and bar from a few breaks I have invested a butt load of time in it.
Best experience I have had in front of a PC... well, apart from the other obvious exception
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Wasn't that EverQuest? And the collective whining resulted in instancing being born.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I don't think I could play it anymore though. At one point I was seriously addicted to it to the point where I was playing it for over ten hours per day and it did worry me that a mere game could have such a hold over me. I'm just glad I took a break from it for almost a year because, despite trying to get back into it, it no longer holds the same appeal for me any more.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I was in the closed EU Beta, I played as the female Gnome Mage named Riel. I started out playing as a Gnome because I thought they were so silly it would be fun for just a beta.
I of course ended up adoring the Gnome race, and my main character became a Gnome Warlock. Same cute face, same hair, except the hair was now red instead of white. I'd like to think it was the same person, who started out as a pure Mage, but ended up as a cruel Warlock. The evil turned her hair red.
Anyway, long story short, I quit the game when TBC came out. I had played the game so much, I had become to hate it.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I just can't play MMO's now, as there's nothing to emulate how fantastically bat-shit insane barrens chat was
I was also even more excited to move into my new place a year ago when I heard it was called The Barrens, and then realised on moving day it was actually The Barons, that made moving day ever so slightly less cool
Comment below viewing threshold Show
.....
Part Sixteen: "Launching the Make you Character's Face Expression Change When Jumping for only €10.99"
Oh right yes.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I also hope anyone at EG is able to remeber the meaning of "journalistic".
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Don't worry it's alive and kicking!
It survived in:
1. General: Ulduar
and before it was in
1. General: Naxxramas etc.
Oh and I will never forget:
1. General Barrens: "High-level ally hunter (don't see level) just jumped from boat coming from Booty Bay."
1 min later:
3. Defense: "Crossroads is under attack!"
*Sigh*
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Having been playing casually (and I really mean casually*) since the open beta, I still enjoy the game today, with the odd break of a month or two here and there. Deffinately interesting to read about it's little know about beginnings
*I've yet to hit the level cap with any of my 3 characters (55 tauren warrior - old main, 20 blood elf paladin - alt, and now 73 death knight troll - current main)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
rarehobo
11/08/09 @ 17:40 WoW is for losers! ha!
MY RESPONSE :-
You are a bumface.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Other games seemed to enjoy making it hard to do simple things like crafting, stat distribution or grouping, but WoW made it all seem a lot easier.
I played for about 3 years, and then had had enough. I still have fond memories of it though!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Why do people seem to think this article is bad journalism? Because it doesn't read like a pretentious EDGE article?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I still believe Blizzard are the only western company who 'gets' that mmo's are a service, not just a one-off game.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Playing a Shammie Dranaei now on Stromscale.
Haven't gone back to my main at all, save to try out isle of Conquest, which was crap.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I found though that the end game devolved into gear, reputation, and/or battle grounds grinding, which I didn't care much for. There was also a nagging feeling that my life was slipping quietly away as I played. So I've been WoW-free for 15 months and counting. Can't say that I'm not tempted to see what I've been missing in the LK expansion though...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
still have fun memories...haven't logged on for a while, but I did after a 6 month break or so and it was a bit weird - it was like going back to a place you used to live, seeing the old haunts etc. sad, i know...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
But being a long time gamer, I must admit its pretty good
Nice article
Comment below viewing threshold Show
and blizz indeed
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I have been playing it since launch myself, bar a few short breaks, and it just keeps delivering.
Hell, me and my wife met in WoW and I ended up moving to another country to be with her, and our kids.
This "game", and I use that term loosely, just draws you in and never lets go, there's just too much to do and explore.
It has it's bad sides, but honestly, what can be perfect in an imperfect world?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I remember playing in a clan game of CS just as WoW was released in the States, and we totally destroyed the team we were playing, who were very strong usually. We obviously started taunting them and joking on about it, and asked them why they all sucked so much - most of them replied that they'd spent too much time playing WoW, and weren't practising together anymore. That was really the first I'd heard of the game, as I was primarily into FPSs back then.
On the strength of their recommendation, and a 94% review in PC gamer, I bought it on launch day in February 2005, and really haven't looked back. Most of the things which I didn't like about the game have been tweaked or removed (like the ridiculous PvP grind to High Warlord/Grand Marshal), and I still find the game interesting and fun enough to log in and play for at least a couple hours a day.
I reckon WoW has cost me about £450 in subscription fees and expansion packs over the last four years, but I don't buy so many games anymore - I'd easily buy 2-3 console or PC titles in a month in the past, and now I only go for the really big AAA titles, so overall I reckon I've saved money from playing the game.
TL
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Certainly my favourite game of all time.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Failing that, I think the only MMO which will "Topple" WoW will be Blizz's next one...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Cant wait for the next one.
More of the same please
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Unlike when I played Everquest, I've never been able to find a mature group of people that I enjoyed playing with and didn't require me to log in every night at 8pm or whatever. I like playing with other players, but I rarely encounter ones that aren't extremely immature - I know one guy who plays in RL and we have a guild of two.... played since launch, never done a raid (in EQ I played in a raid every night hardcore guild).
The only bad thing about WoW is the community.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm a console gamer and no a big fan of PC gaming except for adventures and RTS, seldom like FPS.
And while I really get the idea of MMOs I'm strangely turned of by all the hordes of players (a few friends of mine are really hooked up to the WoW experience) who talk in geek code and follow a really strict gameplay hierarchy, shouting all over the place at each others ... just like the South Park episode.
But many people think it is worth the montly pay so there must be something, and I'm pretty sure I know the reason why WoW is boring to me... the setting is not my thing, if they finally released the Star Trek Online MMO, maybe I'll take a try ... still I'm sceptical because I want to play when I want and when I have time and then not for endless hours.
I'm more like a co-op dude in Army of Two than 40 people storming the castle with micromanagement all over the place...?
Comment below viewing threshold Show