Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest Hands On

Xbox 360 PC PlayStation 3 Hands On by Robert Purchese

9 December, 2008

Page 2 of 2. <- Page 1

Then it was off to Minas Morgul, the home of the Witch King, for a spot of Capture the Ring. This is a capture-the-flag mode with the One Ring, but, as Frodo found out, carrying it makes you a bit slow and effeminate, and the gold band (extra-large backpack-sized) slows down the bearer as they make for base and a point. We went on to do a similar round in Mount Doom, as you do, but one rather oiled, overseas developer knew exactly where to go, the spoilsport, so we lost a lot, although the mini-map and on-screen pointers would have been helpful if we hadn't been so cack-footed.

The other round was the outrageous Hero Team Deathmatch, where you're no ordinary rank-and-file fighter but one of five stars of the jumbled tale. On the evil side there's the Witch King, the Mouth of Sauron, Wormtongue, Saruman and Lurtz (the Uruk-hai who kills Boromir), then for good there's Gandalf, Aragorn, Agent Smith, Éowyn and Will Turner from Pirates of the Caribbean. The first team to 50 points wins, and our encounter outside The Black Gate was almost neck and neck, although good ultimately prevailed. There's regular Team Deathmatch, too, but why you would want that over Heroes is beyond our comprehension.

It's also worth pointing out that the Ring Bearer mode once talked about has disappeared, at least as far as we could see or were told. This would have put Frodo, adorned with Sting blade and invisibility ring, against a pack of Ringwraiths, who fight amongst themselves to return the ring to their master. Frodo could become invisible, but doing so would mark his location on the mini-map. If this was still in the game, anyway.

And 'talked about back at announcement' brings us to our main concern: we first heard about Conquest back in May, just seven months ago, and yet the game is ready for launch next month, and this is the first time anyone's been allowed to play it. Developer Pandemic has a decorated history, what with Battlefront and Mercenaries, so why not shout about Conquest?

Maybe it's because technologically Conquest appears dated. The visuals are messy and drab, and it's actually quite hard to tell the evil side apart, which is rescued only by the protruding gut of the chunky Orc Mage, or the weapons each class carries. And this is all but final code. Perhaps Pandemic has been chopping detail in favour of epic battles, but there's nothing of the sort in multiplayer. The crowds we did see, as background for the single-player tutorial, looked as if they could have been whipped out of a racing game stadium.

'The Lord of the Rings: Conquest' Screenshot 2

Ent you had enough yet?

We're also curious as to why the single-player game wasn't on show. It's a hefty bulk of the concept, with key battles from the books, and campaigns as first good and then evil. We could have been wowed by Gandalf tackling a Balrog, or the scope of Helm's Deep, Pelennor Fields, or the Evil forces sacking The Shire. And, lest we forget, these are co-operative missions for two people, so we could have tag-teamed our way through the likes of Mines of Moria.

It's hard not to conclude that Pandemic has re-clothed Battlefront II in Tolkein's wardrobe because EA wants to do something with the Lord of the Rings licence, and sadly none of the developers were around to answer our questions about that, which slightly frustrating, because Conquest may be silly, but licensed games sometimes hit their peak when the IP goes native. Instead, we'll have to wait until mid-January to find out whether Conquest manages this trick, or whether it belongs in the graveyard slot to which EA's schedulers seem to have quietly and perhaps tellingly confined it.

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest is due out for PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 on 16th January.

Advertisement

Are you excited about The Lord of the Rings: Conquest on PC/PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-24 of 24 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
DFawkes
10/12/08 @ 08:42
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Legolas winz0r = teh awesome.

I so want this. I've still not played a bad LOTR game, and I love the developer, and I especially love Battlefront. So LOTR: Battlefront is probably my dream game.
bad09
10/12/08 @ 08:54
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I agree with DFawkes LOTR + BF is too good to ignore. :)

I said it recently on the trailer for this, BF1/2 are my favourite online experiences, which I could play for ages (in fact BF1 was the game that convinced me to finally join the world of online play on PC and lead to my original xbox and Live).

Dated graphics don't really matter if the game is good (as long as it's not that dated!). Besides BF was never really a looker anyway it was all about the battles.

BF was a marmite game IMO your loved it or hated it. I loved it and have faith Pandemic can pull this off and will take the plunge I reckon.

(still want BF3 though, hurry up Free Radical FFS!!!!!!)
DoctorZoidberg
10/12/08 @ 09:14
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A little more than 8v8 would have been good.

Still it looks interesting, good multiplayer, with a chance to (finally) play an epic fight at helms deep! (hopefully!)
Dizzy
10/12/08 @ 09:30
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mages in LotRs??? Did Gandalf ever cast lighting or throw fireballs?
DoctorZoidberg
10/12/08 @ 09:32
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Dizzy, Didn't he shoot lightning against the giant monster in the mines?

As for fire, I suppose you have to give them something or they will be a bit rubbish.
Bertie [staff]
10/12/08 @ 09:33
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mages in LotRs??? Did Gandalf ever cast lighting or throw fireballs?

He definitely wanted to. Saruman was bricking it.

Actually, he does some lightning in The Hobbit. Otherwise I quite like the way he doesn't use much,
Edited 1 times, most recently on 10/12/08 @ 09:34
DrRobotnik
10/12/08 @ 09:36
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It was always going to be disappointing. The Battlefront series was solid, but ultimately underwhelming. The LOTR license needs a headline developer like Bioware, Valve, Bungie or Ubisoft to really pull of a game worthy of its name. Sadly, with EA at the helm, that's not likely to happen.

Oh well, at least the films were good.
DFawkes
10/12/08 @ 09:37
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Implied power is so much cooler than actually using it. You just know if he went ape, Gandalf would own everyone. Fire, lightning, wind, and anything else, he can just summon it all - if he wanted to. But he doesn't. Kind of like a cat with a grenade launcher, you know not to piss him off just in case.
Bertie [staff]
10/12/08 @ 09:40
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Kind of like a cat with a grenade launcher, you know not to piss him off just in case.

:D
Dizzy
10/12/08 @ 10:21
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It was actually a rhetorical question guys :)

Gandalf only used firework magic and of course his "voice". He couldn't really interfere explicitly in the affairs of Middle Earth.
iokthemonkey
10/12/08 @ 10:52
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The LOTR license needs a headline developer like Bioware, Valve, Bungie or Ubisoft to really pull of a game worthy of its name. Sadly, with EA at the helm, that's not likely to happen.

----

Turbine have done a superb job with LOTRO. Just remember EA have the MOVIE rights.
SixFootHalfling
10/12/08 @ 11:01
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ iokthemonkey
I thought they had the book rights as well, leading to BFME2 having battles that were only "hinted at in the books" (read made up to fit the game)

but then again I only played it once so I may be wrong
iokthemonkey
10/12/08 @ 11:07
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ iokthemonkey
I thought they had the book rights as well, leading to BFME2 having battles that were only "hinted at in the books" (read made up to fit the game)

but then again I only played it once so I may be wrong

----

My understanding is EA have the movie rights and Turbine have the books. I could be wrong but that's what I'd read, anyway...
DFawkes
10/12/08 @ 11:08
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Indeed, EA did snap up the book rights too. I think Turbine only retain the MMO rights.
Darkjinxter
10/12/08 @ 11:21
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mages?
Orc Mages?
Elven archers in Minas Tirith?
Is nothing sacred at Tolkein Enterprise Tower these days?

I'll buy it anyway.
smernicki
10/12/08 @ 11:41
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i loved the battlefront games, but this just doesn't appear to have pushed any of the ideas forward very much since BF2
DrRobotnik
10/12/08 @ 11:41
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
iokthemonkey - right you are. Turbine are doing a fantastic job. Well pointed out.
Krusty
10/12/08 @ 11:45
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Crikey, and to think that the Runekeeper is contentious in LOTRO, this sounds bonkers :/

Did Tolkien Estates have any comments on this?!
iokthemonkey
10/12/08 @ 12:06
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Indeed, EA did snap up the book rights too. I think Turbine only retain the MMO rights.

---

Ah, I see. That's more twisty and tangled than a twisty-tangled thing that's not been brushed for a month...
Azazel
10/12/08 @ 13:40
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Dizzy: Yes. Yes he did.
ronuds
10/12/08 @ 15:01
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
OMG, what a waste and exploitation of a perfectly good franchise.

I'm sure this is exactly what Tolkien would have wanted. It sounds like the most idiotic piece of crap I've ever heard even mentioned for an LotR game. Ugh...
Eroneouse
10/12/08 @ 17:28
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If EA are the publisher I for one will not touch this game with a 10 foot barge pole it will almost certainly contain SecuROM which takes control of ring 0 in the windows Kernal and yes they have a MAC version of SecuROM too and no doubt it will be restricted by the 3 or 5 activations rule so youll never be able to resell it second hand I will stick with Turbines game thanks with no spyware or activations rule not to mention EA's absolutely awfull customer service by far the worst ive ever come across where can I vote so I can give this title the 0 it will deserve. If only it wasn't published by EA it might be worth looking at.
DFawkes
10/12/08 @ 18:11
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Buy it for console then?

I once got all up in arms about SecuROM, then found out I already had it installed with some of my favourite games (like Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War: Soulstorm, Star Wars: Empire At War and Frontlines: Fuel of War). SO now I'm happy if it doesn't have installation restrictions.
marronthered
10/12/08 @ 23:29
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
oh shit i really want this game more than any other at the minute... and it looks crapola!!

dRrobotnik +1

Comments: 1-24 of 24 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery