The Club Preview
Bizarre's grand opening.
During the latest presentation of The Club, SEGA refers to it as 'gladiators with guns', which is a pretty reasonable description. So is 'a third-person shooter with a mature theme and a pick-up-and-play sensibility', which is used later in the presentation. Neither description does justice to the range and diversity of influences on the game though. The key influence is, of course, Project Gotham (as you'll know if you read Eurogamer's E3 preview). Specifically, the game's creator, Bizarre Creations, wants to do for the shoot-'em-up what its Gotham series did for the racing genre. The Club is an attempt to impose a unique scoring system and innovative game modes upon the shoot-'em-up genre to produce something fresh and novel. But still, that's selling the game short. There's a whole load of other unlikely influences, ranging from TimeSplitters to Tony Hawk's by way of the odd beat-'em-up, a bit of Manhunt and back to SEGA's own OutTrigger.
Although the high concept - Project Gotham for guns - has been knocking around Bizarre Creations for ages, the game's been in actual development for 18 months, by a 49-strong team with the likes of Fur Fighters and Project Gotham on their CVs. Nevertheless, Bizarre hasn't been afraid to use outside talent: 2000AD's Gordon Rennie's been drafted in to draft the back-story and character biographies; John Wallin came in to provide the concept art for the game's environments (after he did such a good job on Gears of War); and the game's guns have been designed by George Hull, who did a similar job on The Matrix and V for Vendetta.

SEGA demonstrated the scale of the environments with a quick fly through. They're big. And winding.
The back-story in question revolves around The Club: "The most secretive and exclusive organisation in the world. The deadliest game on the planet." The premise is that some of the world's most powerful people sponsor participants in The Club's deadly bouts for nothing more than their own idle amusement. And the world's most powerful people are so powerful that Bizarre has retconned the real world, casting The Club as the shadowy organisation behind many key moments in history. Thus real world conflicts are actually the outcome of the world's richest and most influential leaders squabbling and arguing over disagreements and gambling debts arising out of the game's secretive blood sport. The American Act of Independence, the Gulf War and so on are all are a testament to the vast scale of money and influence riding on the outcome of Club fights.
The playable characters in question, are, of course, the participants in that blood sport, and they demonstrate the influence of beat-'em ups on the game's design. Indeed, during the presentation a SEGA spokesman refers to the game as "a beat-'em up with guns", and reckons that the game combines the "diversity of a fighting game with the intensity of a shooter". Which is another reasonable description of the game. There were originally 12 characters before they were whittled down to reach the final eight. That final eight is not, as you might expect, the eight characters who inspired the broadest agreement in testing, but actually those characters who polarised opinion and provoked the strongest reactions. That's because Bizarre doesn't want the sorts of characters who inspire bland consensus. Instead they want characters that you can learn to love to hate, generating the sorts of gaming rivalries that have been going ever since E. Honda handslapped his way around Zangief's spinning piledriver.

Watching other players might show you routes and techniques you hadn't considered.
For example, there's Renwick, who bears an uncanny likeness to Ving Rhames and who, to judge by his NYPD body armour, is some kind of ex-cop (further evidence is provided by his catchphrase at the start of sessions: "I'm going to infiltrate The Club and destroy it from within"). Other characters include a pouting Japanese Ura-Harajuku youth and a Russian assassin, kidnapped from a forest, who comes complete with ferrets hanging from his waist. Each one is obviously distinguished from each other by their appearance, but also by a range of underlying attributes that will become obvious when you play with them - stamina, speed, and favouring different weapons.
The environments reveal a bit more about the back-story, and highlight, again, the influence of Project Gotham. There are eight locations, spread out around the world. As in Project Gotham, however, each environment is home to multiple different layouts so there will actually be around 50 or 60 specific level designs, each of which will be further distinguished by different weather conditions or different times. The eight environments in question tell you a bit about the type of people who participate in the high stakes gambling on offer in The Club: there's prison cells, a bunker, a war-torn city, a manor house, and even a disused ocean liner. The Steel Mill that provides the setting for SEGA's presentation is, for example, owned by a powerful movie director: any fears that the locals might have are kept in check by the story that it's being used as the set of a particularly violent movie.

Bizarre has taken the sort of anally retentive accuracy that has become a staple of the racing genre and applied it to The Club. The sound is so accurately modelled that a different sound is used for ricochets off (and to) different surfaces.
Once the action actually starts, the first thing you notice is that the game looks pretty sweet. There's a really neat blur effect when your character sprints, for example, and the character animations really stand out. The next thing you notice is that this game is not about stealth. No sir. It's about 'relentless pace and skill' according to SEGA. Which seems to translate as not stopping moving, blowing loads of stuff up really quickly and stylishly, with lots of explosions, and shaking cameras and so on. Controls are simple and designed to facilitate a streamlined fighting experience: smashing through doors or vaulting over obstacles are context-sensitive actions, and melee attacks will essentially be auto-targeting (a la Gears of War). Holding the left trigger zooms in, but what you gain in accuracy you lose in speed.
And then you notice the Tony Hawk's influence. The main aim of the game is to beat target scores, or your friends, by racking up points. And you rack up points by killing enemies and stringing those kills into combinations. As we were shown back at E3, extra points are awarded on the basis of hit locations (hitting enemies in the head, for example), or style (rolling round corners before hitting your enemy in the head, for example), or for weapon-specific reasons (rolling around a corner and then hitting your enemy in the head while using your shotgun up close, for example). It's also possible to gain bonuses by hitting enemies with ricochet shots, or by seeing them off with the last bullet in your clip (in fact the game's rhythm is partly determined by your need to balance reload times with the appearance of enemies). And there are special 'skullshot' symbols that you can shoot to keep your combo multiplier going.

At the end of each level you'll be given a range of stats, such as 'rivals killed', 'longest combo' and 'skull shots'. Other rewards include TimeSplitter-style mirth, and just stuff like kicking through a certain number of doors and so on.
And that's why it's like Tony Hawk's (or, indeed Chilli Con Carnage). Because the real object of the game is to chain together lengthy combos and to replay levels until you've mastered their particular nuances. The enemy AI isn't especially bright, but that's not the point here: it's entirely possible to learn the position of your opponents and take advantage of that on your next play through, and that's precisely the point. (As to what motivates these cannon fodder to turn up to a job with few prospects of seeing the end of it, well apparently they're drawn from the ranks of criminal detritus and lowlifes looking for a promotion, and they don't know that the odds are stacked against them.)
The occasional roving enemies throw in an element of unpredictability, but although it's possible to be killed (as, indeed, SEGA's producers were on a couple of occasions), the general balance of health pick-ups and damage done by enemies tends to favour the player. Consequently, it's fairly easy to get to the end of any given level: the real challenge is to score enough points to unlock the next one. That might be a fairly linear, tight level, with the occasional multiple route, as in the demonstration, or it might be an open arena, or simply a survival challenge involving staying alive for as long as possible. But each level takes only two to five minutes to play through - so the game isn't punitive if you miss the start of a particular combo and want to begin again, or if you want to pass the controller to one of your friends to see if they can beat your score. Or you could just participate in one of the game's multiple multiplayer modes, though SEGA remains coy about those for the moment.
And so that's The Club. It's enormously promising. And it's a vibrantly depicted arcadey arena third-person shooter, with a snuff movie ethic and beat-'em-up sensibility, in which you stack up improbable combo-chains to gain kudos from your friends and cause big explosions. Which is the best description I can come up with, anyway.
You may also like...
-
Mass Effect 3 Demo: The First 20 Minutes
-
Face-Off: Final Fantasy 13-2
-
Retrospective: Star Wars Episode I Racer
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
Game of the Week: Catherine
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
Gotham City Impostors Review
-
App of the Day: Ascension: Chronicle of the Godslayer
-
Face-Off: The Darkness 2
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Review
-
Epic's Sweeney on graphics tech: "the limit really is in sight"
-
The Darkness 2 Review
-
Grand Slam Tennis 2 Review
-
Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Vita Review
-
EA evaluating FIFA Street features for FIFA 13
-
One Piece: Unlimited Cruise SP Review
-
App of the Day: Sir Benfro's Brilliant Balloon
-
Catherine Review
-
King Arthur 2 Review
-
Sony admits "dropping the ball" with Demon's Souls
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 now live for Xbox 360
-
Metal Gear Solid: The "Lost" HD Remasters
-
Mass Effect 3 FemShep trailer debuts
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 performance tip: make a new manual save









Comments (47) Latest comment 5 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Basic repetitive enemy AI justified by the addition of combos? Nah, not worth £40 to me.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
With 2-5 minute levels and a choice of different types of characters, it sounds like it deserves a stronger focus on multiplayer than single player. Or not, I dunno, this is the first I've heard of this game.
edit: Agree about STALKER, if you're after an FPS that does things differently then that's the direction I'd want to take.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
isnt't that sega in a nutshell? (thats a good thing btw!)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Shoot stuff, get high scores, beat your mate's scores, unlock stuff, 5 minute play time, everything I want from a game sometimes. Plus loads of downloadable content from Bizarre to keep things fresh.
I'm really looking forward to Bioshock as well, but its good to have a dip in dip out game that isn't a racer for a change.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The main problem i've had with every TPS i've played is that they generally combine moments of inspired, engineered genius with long passages of relatively brainless blasting. To me, it sounds like Bizarre Creation have removed the brainless blasting and created a game which is a long chain of inspired set pieces, amplified by the need to complete them in as skillful a manner as possible.
Personally I can't wait to see more of this. I loved the philosophy behind the MSR/PGR series and I think its a philosophy that could work well in a shooter context. I can't see how anyone who didn't hate PGR can not be at least a little exicted by this.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It does seem to give a new angle to the tired FPS genre, not sure how it will work in repetitive gaming session over a period of time but look like it work best online and expect great use of Gotham TV style and replays of the greatest 'hits'.
I am quite intrigued though.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
PGR3 should demonstrate to everybody that these guys cannot create an AAA class game. It was already their fourth try.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Would you care to explain why PGR3 cannot be considered a triple A title, or are you just flaming?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
>"PGR3 should demonstrate to everybody that these guys cannot create an AAA class game. It was already their fourth try. "
I'm soooo tempted to throw insults your way.
Maybe you should read the gamerankings of all thier games, starting from MSR (and even fur fighters).
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Remember the first rule of The Club!...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think there's a place for both arcade-y shooters and engrossing, story-based shooters in this world.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
FEAR did the gunplay so well and so stylishly that I can imagine it working. This game will have to get the combat spot-on too, which is tough, and if it can pull it off it could be a lot of fun.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Sounds interesting...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
When games started lasting longer than an hour or two I guess.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The presentation, however, has me utterly disinterested. The only way it could look any more generic would be to set it in WWII.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I only liked that out of desperation, simply because (as great as the dreamcast was) the DC never had a great split-screen offline shooter in the vain of the goldeneye/perfect dark, and the future of halo.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Ironically, we are the ones quick to moan when shooter 1948 is released again.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Spot on
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Especially since HL/Halo do nothing for me at all. Timesplitters 2/3 are my favourite FPS's, to put it into perspective. If this as a great multiplayer then i'm sold.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Tjesus, this kind of thing is ancient and basically standard in any fps (quake, ut, etc.)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think this is sounding like a lot of fun. I enjoy crazy, short burst, third person action games, even those that put a lot of emphasis on repeating levels to perfect them. Otogi and Phantom Crash are two prime examples. They're not for everyone, granted, but they are for me
Comment below viewing threshold Show
So, yeah, this is almost certainly a buyer, as soon as SEGA issue a date, for it to be out.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I mean, it's not like you can tell anything from EG's screenshots, seeing as they are almost always press release shots that look nothing like what you'll see in the game.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The third line of the preview runs thus: 'a third-person shooter with a mature theme and a pick-up-and-play sensibility'
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I usually skip all the prime number lines though, so I have an excuse.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Don't most people aim to clear a level during a normal FPS? At least there is a story something to keep the players interest and moving forward through the game. Playing for points is just ummm empty?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think it's good to aim at doing something different. Why try and muscle in on an already well served genre like FPS when they can breathe fresh life into a 3rd person beat-em-up with guns?! They managed it with racing back with MSR/PGR so I believe they will do it again.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
PGR3 should demonstrate to everybody that these guys cannot create an AAA class game. It was already their fourth try."
I guess they need you to pop to their office and give them your wisdom. I'm sure they could do with advice from an obese sixteen year old who only social skill is posting trash on these boards.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I can't help but think that this would be much better as an online game, if you could get the 40 odd players that Resistance manages. General points based gun carnage on a decent sized arena, with much bigger points for nominated targets, and style shots added, points deducted for getting wasted. Styled kills of mongo AI? Points scores and EA style combos won't make this rise above the crowd.
Personally, I think Afterburner and the like killed high scores. It gave you a zillion points per second just for staying alive. Once unskilled scores headed past 6 zeros, it became a joke. A million on Defender or Tempest: major achievement. A million on Outrun: average score.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Doesn't impress me
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I have no prejudice towards shooters, a good game is a good game regardless the genre.