Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Take-Two sues over pulled GTA IV ads News

Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 News by Robert Purchese

6 May, 2008

Take-Two is seeking legal damages from the Chicago Transit Authority after it decided to pull Grand Theft Auto IV ads from buildings and buses around the city.

The publisher claims a violation of both its free speech rights and a contractual agreement, according to GameSpot.

"Although we prefer to resolve these issues amicably," said a Take-Two spokesperson, "The CTA has refused to discuss with us its outrageous decision to pull advertising for the critically acclaimed game Grand Theft Auto IV while running ads for other forms of popular entertainment with similar content, including mature-themed TV shows and R-rated movies."

Take-Two is after around USD 300,000 in compensation as its six-week campaign of 385 ads had only just begun.

The Chicago Transit Authority, one of the largest mass transit operators in the whole of North America did you know, decided to remove the GTA IV adverts because of a previous problem with Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas.

Adverts for this 2004 title provoked many to complain, but the campaign had run its course before the CTA could do anything about it.

The Chicago Transit Authority has said it will not charge Take-Two for the aborted GTA IV campaign.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Grand Theft Auto IV on PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
parrapa
06/05/08 @ 08:20
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Any pictures of the adverts?
ZuluHero
06/05/08 @ 08:21
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
lol - the (business) empire strikes back!

Games = 1
real life nonsense = 0

a good start to the week (for a change) ;)

X201
06/05/08 @ 08:30
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@parrapa

They were nothing outrageous just the same pictures of game characters style that has been used for all other adverts.

Kotaku and gamepolitics have photos if you want to see them.

XdarXideX
06/05/08 @ 08:36
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's incredible how stupid people can be. So the artwork slightly resembles a cartoon... it must be advertised with children in mind!!! Oh no!!!
MBar
06/05/08 @ 08:36
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
... while running ads for other forms of popular entertainment with similar content, including mature-themed TV shows and R-rated movies.

It's a fair point and I like what they're trying to accomplish, but it could so easily back-fire on the cause ...
Marshall2008
06/05/08 @ 08:41
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sue the shit out of them.
menage
06/05/08 @ 08:42
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What the hell, There's isn't anything in those ads which is even mildly offensive. Sue the bastards.
Rash'
06/05/08 @ 08:48
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well clearly the status quo needs a kick up the arse at CTA. Good on Take2 to make a stand and rightfully demand justice for ill treatment by CTA. I hope they win.
Yeevle
06/05/08 @ 08:50
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm getting sick of the hypocrisy of it all. Good for them on deciding to sue. I've never been a huge fan of the GTA series but nevertheless, the stupid moral outrage some mouthbreathers have against it is bloody stupid.
DanWhitehead
06/05/08 @ 09:08
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
They can sue them for breach of contract, though if the CTA isn't charging them anything for the aborted campaign that might complicate matters, but there's no way this is a freedom of speech issue and to present it as such is dangerously naive. The First Amendment only defends speech from congressional censorship - a private business like the CTA is under no constitutional obligation to carry anybody's advertising.
kangarootoo
06/05/08 @ 09:14
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@DanWhitehead

Absolutely. My initial thought was "well it sucks, but a business can choose to carry or deline any advert it wants surely?". I guess the only difference here is backing out of a contract, as you say.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 06/05/08 @ 10:14
RexRunti
06/05/08 @ 09:33
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Kanga and DanWhitehead

Of course with a name like Chicago Transit Authority there may be links to the state, the city or some other public authority so the first amendment may well be applicable or at least arguably applicable. Of course breach of contract is probably the argument that will win it and the first amendment stuff is just useful background to get judge and/or jury on side.
TheJuriel
06/05/08 @ 09:35
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Whoo! Good start to a week. I'm all for them suing people that discriminate based on idiocy.
Goffee
06/05/08 @ 10:01
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
T2 is trying to come up with excuses for low-sales, maybe.

http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/5/is_gt...

PS that's low from the shareholder point of view, not geek on street

Fab4
06/05/08 @ 10:14
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"yes, we had problems with the San Andreas campaign...oh, fuck it! Lets accept the campaign for the new one too."
L42yB
06/05/08 @ 10:39
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think this is a very good thing. They can't take their money before hand, and then take the adds down later. They should have been fully aware of what they were advertising when they initially signed the contract. Now Take2 need to sue the MDT too :)

@Goffee
The game really hasn't been out long enough for accurate sales figures to be realeased... sheesh, give them some time.

catul
06/05/08 @ 11:30
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Personally, I cannot blame the CTA esp if the org is getting complaints from riders. When San Andreas was out, I only saw the ads in impoverished areas with higher minority populations in Chicago. Those ads stuck me as racist since they did not feature whites toting guns.

The CTA needs the money badly so it must be getting a lot of complaints esp since violence/deaths among the youth is up in the city when the overall murder/violence rate is down. I known VGs do not cause violent crime but reminders of violence will not benefit anyone esp when a 5 year old was just shot. This is a business decision and not censorship.
L42yB
06/05/08 @ 11:37
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@catul -

Have a look at the pictures of the so called "offensive" adverts. They are simply pictures of the main characters in the game. There are no guns and no depiction of violence in them at all!

So your argument doesn't really hold up... It is not the content of the ads, but the content of the game that is being advertised that has caused them to remove the ads.

That is not acceptable and that is why they are being sued. Why do they continue to advertise R-rated movies and TV series' which have graphic depictions of violence, far more realistic than anything in GTA (in the film/TV series - not on the ads themselves), but refuse to advertise this game anymore? AFTER agreeing to do it in the first place? It is hypocritical and they deserve to get sued.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 06/05/08 @ 12:39
actionfitz
06/05/08 @ 12:19
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The Chicago Transit Authority has said it will not charge Take-Two for the aborted GTA IV campaign."

fuck, thats awful good of them...
lol
stoopidgreg
06/05/08 @ 12:20
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
wasn't it fox "news" that persuaded them to take them down?
hula hoops
06/05/08 @ 12:55
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nope, it was Weasel News
kangarootoo
06/05/08 @ 13:01
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@RexRunti

It just occurred to me, I wonder if the title CTA sounding a lot like GTA has any bearing at all. They don't say what sort of complaints they received the first time around. Maybe customer confusion was part of the deal?

In any event, its not like the they just said no this time. They accepted the advertising and THEn changed their minds, which is probably core to the whole affair.
DanWhitehead
06/05/08 @ 15:04
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Chances are that selling of ad space is handled by an agency. That agency could have booked the ads, only for the decision to be vetoed later. If they're carrying ads for R-rated movies and violent TV shows then, yes, that's hypocritical - but last time I checked you can't sue for hypocrisy.
Feanor
06/05/08 @ 16:19
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I saw some GTA ads on buses in Philadelphia this past weekend. They probably caused that cop to get shot.
Ryze
06/05/08 @ 18:35
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hit 'em HARD!
RandomTerrain
06/05/08 @ 19:38
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
GTA 4 doesn't need to be advertised though does it?
Seriously, every gamer knows about it.
Oh well, sue them anyway. Why not, eh?

Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery