Supreme Commander 2 Preview

ACU in the hole?

There are two possible reactions to any mention of Supreme Commander. Yes, just two. Don't pull that "how dare you force the entirety of human experience and attitude into just two boxes" stuff with me. Two! If it turns out there's more I'd have to axe this entire introduction, and then where would we be? We'd have a preview without an intro, and there'd be anarchy. Killings would be necessary. So: two possible reactions.

Number one! "Oh yes, yes, the only true real-time-strategy game of recent years - none of this dumbed-down experience points and tank-rushing stuff."

Number two! "It's too complicated, it's boring, and the entire genre is doomed etc."

The problem being that making a game for a very specific audience - i.e. dyed-in-the-wool strategy gamers raised on Total Annihilation back in the 1990s - means the rest of the world curls its lip at you. SupCom 2 isn't taking any such risk. Yet at the same time, creator Gas Powered Games seems determined not to lose any of SupCom's ferociously dedicated existing audience. It's tempting to blame the lack of boat-rocking on GPG having made a right pig's ear of their last two games: Space Siege by being dreadful, and Demigod by being a multiplayer-led game whose multiplayer didn't work. They need a hit, in other words.

'Supreme Commander 2' Screenshot 1

Nothing about SupCom 2 suggests fear or compromise, though. The number of unit types has been sliced in half and resource-gathering has been made easier, but it's still huge and lavish in a way that no other combat-only RTS has tried to be. The aim isn't to lower the complexity significantly so much as to show its working this time around - to introduce players to all its tanks and planes and submarines and enormous cyborg lizards gradually and coherently, rather than throwing everything at you and expecting you to work it all out.

At the same time, speaking to GPG's boss Chris Taylor (full interview to follow soon!), it's clear he's trying to push this as much more of a single-player game. Always a tricky thing for an RTS to do, but if this is more than mere marketing speak it's quite a big step for GPG to take. SupCom had a very rambly story and far too many talking heads in its campaigns, but really it was a multiplayer game - existing more for titantic tests of online will and skill than for narrative satisfaction. GPG is really leaning on storytelling for the sequel - focusing in to character-led familial drama, with the far-flung robo-war between three future-Earth factions as a backdrop rather than taking centre stage itself.

In practice, this seems to mean lots more cut-scenes and talking heads, so the writing and acting needs to be pretty damned sharp to pull it off. Personally, I haven't been terribly engaged by the cut-scenes I've seen, so I'm a little worried I'm going to be reaching for the Escape key in half of them, but then it's early days and the somewhat-droning chatter I've heard is very much out-of-context. It's surely not an easy task to make players relate to a guy who pretty much spends the entire game sitting in a big chair inside a building-sized robot's cockpit, which is why they've also included characters such as a talking brain in a jar. So, hopefully a big dollop of sci-fi silliness is going to make SupCom 2 a bit of a romp too.

Especially as the silliness extends to the units. The Experimentals - the super-units of the first SupCom - get a little more time in the sun this time around, increasing in number as well as in ease of availability. Minor Experimentals are smaller but no less crazy ones you can deploy fairly early in the match, or there's the option to "half-bake" a big'un: kick it into the world before it's even finished, but with a high chance of its grinding to a halt every few seconds.

The idea is that it's no longer just a game of indistinguishable tanks having at each other from great distances, but one where robotic colossi trade stand amidst and over this ongoing teenier warfare. There are 27 Experimentals in all, and only a few have been shown so far - an enormous UFO, a machine that speed-builds armies then lobs them at a distant location one-by-one, like some kind of apocalyptic Pez dispenser, the Illuminate Space Temple - a teleporter - and, most excitingly, the Cybranasaurus Rex.

Or "the big bloody dinosaur", as you'll doubtless refer to it. SupCom's has always been a cold, all-metal world, so the sudden appearance of something fleshy (albeit with enormous robotic implants and guns all over it) is a revelatory sight. The machine world comes alive at last: that's the kind of personality the developers are trying to get into SupCom 2 to leave behind that dead-eyed distance of the first game.

'Supreme Commander 2' Screenshot 2

There's also a little more autonomy now, which should help with that. Instead of sitting around waiting for orders, your ever-vital Engineer drones can now patrol, for instance, auto-collecting any scrap metal lying around and fixing any friendly units they pass. It's one more flicker of visible life to the game, and also one less thing to micro-manage in the heat of battle. It's one of many small changes designed to make the game more accessible, so you can think about grand strategy rather than the constant holding of tiny hands.

Some will grumble, inevitably, but the point of SupCom has always been Massive War: when you're a little more free to throw your vast army at another vast army, things can only got massiver. (Microsoft Word tells me "massiver" isn't a real word, incidentally, because Microsoft Word has no joy). It's all set in a brand-new (well, more or less - bits of Demigod seem to be in there) engine, too, so the fiddly blockiness of SupCom 1 is left behind in favour of something a little softer, a little more cartoony, almost.

Flashier but more personal. Complicated but more accessible. Bigger but smaller. Supreme Commander 2 may be steadfastly saluting the flag of strategy tradition, but one thing it certainly hasn't done is to take the easy road.

Supreme Commander 2 is due out for PC and Xbox 360 this spring.

Comments (23) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Martin #1 2 years ago

    Sorry Alec, my reaction was: "The what now Commander 2?"

    I'll go get the knives...

    EDIT: I might sound bitter but I'm genuinely curious as to why this got voted down. The above was a joke, written tounge-in-cheek in order to poke hole in Alecs intro.

    Is there no humour left among the Eurogamer readers or is it an instinctive reaction to vote down anything that is "off-topic" or not just praising the game/review/score? I agree that not everyone might find the joke funny but is that what we are voting on - how funny I am?

    I'm not really expecting an answer as this is now below the threshold but I am really curious as to why it got a negative score so please, indulge me.
    Edited by 1 at 07/01/10 @ 14:57
  • Hunam #2 2 years ago

    The focus on big units scrapping sounds good, but it sounds like most of the stuff I loved about SupCom isn't there. Building sprawling bases, spending hours having small sorties across the map before you both start lobbing nukes at each other hoping to find that single gap in their nuke shield/defense grid before both making a thousand units and throwing them at each other whilst a giant spider and mech have a fist fight, stomping on the units below.
    Edited by 1 at 06/01/10 @ 17:11
  • Boomerang #3 2 years ago

    Now THAT ^ sounds fucking good.
  • Spuzzell #4 2 years ago

    But.. engineer units could always patrol! That's how I played Supreme!

    Solid line of cannons, solid line of flak cannons, three patrolling flights of fighters, lots of engineers patrolling the perimeter to deal with repairs automatically, everything under a shield generator and self repairing while I built an offence.

    Watch enemy bash head against defensive wall till you get bored of squishy sound and then send in the bombers and nukes, rolling over the twitching charred remains with a triumphant wave of bots and tanks. Ahhhhhhhhhh.
  • Ryuken #5 2 years ago

    Nukes, turrets, bases and shields are still in folks. I am much more curious about the practical multiplayer/skirmish plans (will there be a beta, what's the multiplayer client on PC, will we get free units post-release like it happened for SupCom and Demigod, what about mod support, etc.), I hope Alec asked the right questions to Chris. Singleplayer can be enjoyable (and the SupCom/FA campaigns were decent enough... for an RTS) but skirmish/multiplayer keeps these games alive.

    And it would be nice to replace that ugly SupCom vanilla boxshot art on the EG frontpage with the actual boxshot art.
    Edited by 2 at 06/01/10 @ 21:52
  • frod. #6 2 years ago

    If ever a game was crying out for a license, it's this one - this and the 40k universe would be absolutely perfect for each other...
  • patchbox360 #7 2 years ago

    supreme commander is good but it can take 3 straight hrs to complete a mission - fuck that
  • Benno #8 2 years ago

    LIKE LIKE LIKE LIKE LIKE

    cant wait for this game! original is my fav RTS ever (apart from age of empires ofc)
  • Tehren #9 2 years ago

  • Stop-gap #10 2 years ago

    SquareEnix? I can see it now... "ACUs have burnt down your village looking for a magic crystal. It is up to YOU to save the world because you're The Prophesised One. With stupid hair."
    Bye bye SupCom.
  • newell123 #11 2 years ago

    This looks brilliant, the single player campaign missions from the first SC were great I thought - but the storyline holding them together was dire, totally forgettable. I really like the look of the battles on this one. Hopefully they can keep the framerate up on the 360 ( I had the first SC on PC but i'm tempted to get this on 360). No screenies of the tactical view though.
    From a lifelong(!) RTS fan I really hope this lives up to the potential.
  • Segnit #12 2 years ago

    I feel kinda disappointed about the butchering of the management aspect of the gameplay... well alright, the truth is I feel very disappointed. I still play SupCom almost daily and I can't say the new direction get's me excited.

    But anyhow, I wish GPG all the best of success in their new direction for the series and I thank them for a decade of TA and SupCom :)
  • Merefield #13 2 years ago

    Hope everyone on this thread has played Spring:

    http://springrts.com/
  • Galathorn #14 2 years ago

    Has anyone played TA: somethign med-fan.. it was, omg, the suck... I bought it on release and omg, it was so bad... '99 if i can remember correctly. Shit nobody remembers that... Sorry. Since then, there is no way I'll buy something till they got a 9/10.
  • Stop-gap #15 2 years ago

    Sure the original had a daft plot, but it was there to string one mission to the next, fair dos, there needs to be something.
    However, *if* they want us to identify with characters and get involved in the plot and what have you, then I really hope they
    hire some more experienced writers.

    For the record, I love Supcom and FA.
  • hahayou #16 2 years ago

    Yes, engineer units have been automatically picking up scrap metal whilst patrolling since Total Annihilation in 1997, let alone SupCom.

  • Nephirion #17 2 years ago

    A PC exclusive, well I never ...
  • Rich72 #18 2 years ago

    Any one know where i can get a copy of core contingency without paying through the nose?
  • PlugMonkey #19 2 years ago

    "Oh dear. Dumming down..."

    Heh heh. Irony FTW!

    Not really sure about SC2. Something a bit more accessibly would be nice. I loved Total Annihilation and thought SC1 was going to be one of my favourite games ever, but I just couldn't get into it. Maybe I just don't have enough time to invest in games like that any more. I had a lot more free time in 1997. ;)

    I guess what I really want is SC to stay the same, and me to be able to go back to playing video games 18 hours a day.As that currently seems unlikely, a more accessible version of SC might hit the spot for me, but not please anyone who DOES still have the time to appreciate it as is.
  • dirk_aircool #20 2 years ago

    SupCom 1 still dont work properly on the 360 so why will this be any different ? Why have half the units and lower the complexity , its all the original TA games had to start with along with massive battlefields and hundreds of units and really good artillery.
  • essgee #21 2 years ago

    i enjoyed SC1 on the pc, hopefully this will be as good!
  • Schiraman #22 2 years ago

    I hope it won't cause chaos if I suggest a third reaction to SC - that being:
    "What's all the fuss about? This is just TA again, except not as good."

    /reinstalls TA
  • TRUTH #23 2 years ago

    Endwar is the only RTS that actually worked well on consoles and esp great online - this is due to a simple interface and use of both voice commands and joypad!

    Pick it up as it's so much better then any other RTS on consoles.