Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 3 Next

Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

StarCraft II Hands On

PC Hands On by Oli Welsh

27 August, 2009

Page 2 of 3. <- Page 1Page 3 ->

And more ambitious with the campaign maps themselves. There are two available to play at BlizzCon. Monlyth presents the Terrans with the opportunity to seize a valuable alien artefact, but the Protoss are after it too - and the Zerg are after the Protoss. The aim is to strike fast at the Protoss camp around the artefact while they're still distracted with the Zerg, and fend off small Zerg raiding parties on the way. It's an interesting twist on a standard StarCraft mission, but the other map, Agria, outshines it.

This tight little map isn't much more than a roadway between a colony and a spaceport. Raynor's been hired to protect the evacuating colonists from a Zerg invasion, sending Marines and flame-throwing Firebats alongside their transports as Zerg swarms rush the road. There are bunkers you can repair and man, but these are less and less use as the Zerg attacks escalate over the course of three tense runs, ending in splattering aerial drops right next to the crawling transport. It's exciting, varied, well-staged and beautifully-paced mission design, a cut above what you usually see from RTS, Blizzard's own games included.

"The big thing is we've tried to ensure each mission is its own sort of mini-game," says Sigaty. "Each mission has its own gimmick, its own mechanic, in addition to introducing you to each unit, a little bit more difficulty as you go on... so you had something new and fresh that you were dealing with, not just another 'go crush the AI' or 'just run these units through the maze'."

'StarCraft II' Screenshot 3

Rising tides of lava gradually shrink this campaign map after an eruption.

The campaign seems like a bolder step forward than StarCraft II's multiplayer, which - notwithstanding years of intricate fine-tuning of the maps and new unit line-ups - Blizzard is happy to admit doesn't rewrite the rules of this perennially popular competitive gaming heavyweight. But it became clear at BlizzCon that, although there's no major change in mechanics, there's a huge change in attitude. StarCraft, so dominated by player speed and micro-management skill, is known for being an intimidating, humbling experience online, denied to all but the gifted few. Blizzard believes it can change that, and it's got two new initiatives to back it up.

Firstly, there's a new single-player component: Challenge maps. These are a combination of multiplayer tutorial and bite-sized, two-minute, score-attack or time-attack scenarios, aimed at teaching newcomers multiplayer techniques and tactics, as well as giving veterans self-improvement workouts. "The key to it really is that we don't feel like single-player teaches you how to play multiplayer," says Sigaty. "This is a way to organically teach you these things that you should start thinking about, control grouping, the mechanics around spell-casting, how to use mana, there's a bunch of them."

He warms to his unlikely theme: making multiplayer StarCraft accessible and rewarding for everybody. "There is certainly, I think rightly so... an impression out there that RTS is very difficult. It's a hardcore genre. Well, I'm not going to get into that, but hopefully we can bridge the gap." Sigaty talks about how long it took him to feel like he could win at Warcraft III. "It took 10 games... I knew it would get to that point, but I think, 10 games, that's ridiculous. If you play three, get your ass handed to you, then you walk away, you say yeah, I think the online thing's not for me."

'StarCraft II' Screenshot 4

Campaign sub-objectives such as seizing Protoss relics and Zerg DNA samples will help technology development.

Pardo, and Battle.net, have the answer. Over and above improved matchmaking algorithms, searches, and the persistent player profiles that should prevent "smurfing" (experienced players creating new accounts to take noobs unawares), there's an ambitious and clever new ladder and tournament system that aims to give players of all skill levels the kind of thrill experienced at the top end of competition - "the competitive arena for everyone", Pardo calls it. "Ladder play doesn't have to be for hardcore gamers only."

There will be seven levels of competition in StarCraft II - five regular bands from Copper to Platinum, book-ended by the e-sports Pro League at the top, and the Practice League at the bottom. Practice League will feature a slowed game speed and maps custom-designed to prevent the rush tactics that can be panic-inducing and off-putting to a new player.

To Page 3 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-39 of 39 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Cider-X
27/08/09 @ 13:09
#1
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Boring!!!!



I kid I kid this will probably be amazing :)
TheDudesRug
27/08/09 @ 13:16
#2
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Smoking in enclosed spaces is frowned upon now.
Azazel
27/08/09 @ 13:28
#3
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I must say that their league system sounds like it could be a winner.
mingster
27/08/09 @ 13:29
#4
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I want this so much right now.
Ninja_Tino
27/08/09 @ 13:32
#5
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I play virtually every genre of games but I have never, ever been good at an RTS. Fire Emblem? Piece of cake. Starcraft? Too damn hard. Woe is me.
Hantheman
27/08/09 @ 13:35
#6
+11
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I like RTS' but I hate them online. It stops being a strategy game, it becomes a "who can micromanage really quickly and play a guide they read online" game.
kar
27/08/09 @ 13:35
#7
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I want it stupidly for multiplayer. But the singleplayer depth and breadth is very welcome. It means this game will get the editorial praise it deserves in the west.
RexRunti
27/08/09 @ 13:49
#8
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Despite all the talk of multiplayer the thing which I really liked about StarCraft 1 was the single player campaign and story. This game is making it look like I'll have to take a time out from my Activision boycott.
hiddenranbir
27/08/09 @ 13:50
#9
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The DoTA surpassing W3 confuses me, surely there can only be as many Dota people as there are W3 copies?

Anyway, looking forward to the single player. If modding is as well supported, with tools, as I hope, I'll be sure to make a sort of RTS syndicate war kind of thing. Persistent small squad!
skillian
27/08/09 @ 13:53
#10
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The DoTA surpassing W3 confuses me, surely there can only be as many Dota people as there are W3 copies?

Presumably they're talking about active players rather than copies sold/downloaded.
Drome
27/08/09 @ 14:14
#11
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ohh... I'm trying so hard not to get overly excited over this. Damn you Blizzard and your scheming ways, always after my well earned money and time!
UncleLou
27/08/09 @ 14:19
#12
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds epic. I will not really play this online, so I really appreciate all the effort going into singleplayer, and I actually like that there will be three separate games with individual campaigns.
peak_performance
27/08/09 @ 14:24
#13
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This game is looking soo good right now. I enjoyed Starcraft (and Warcraft 3 on that matter) about equally for their singleplayer and multiplayer and Blizzard seem to have absolutely the right idea of how to make them both work seperately.
rob76
27/08/09 @ 14:29
#14
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can't wait for this. The best RTS game ever is about to be bettered!!
oMonarca
27/08/09 @ 14:39
#15
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
All signs point to a game that has the means to be around for generations.

People generations...

Dammit Blizzard, always one step ahead.
skillian
27/08/09 @ 14:39
#16
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wouldn't normally play a game like this online either, but if their system truly does mean that I won't get thrashed 7 out of every 10 games, then sure, I'll give it a go.
Sunyavadin
27/08/09 @ 15:08
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Boring!!!!

I kid I kid this will probably be amazing :)


No, I think you were right the first time...
Blizzard are playing catchup in the RTS game. They've been out so long they want to emulate all the innovations since their last title. Admittedly they look like they're doing this well, but I don't see it as being anything new and different, and while it should be at least as good as Starcraft was, I think anyone expecting more is going to be sorely disappointed.

And of course they've seen how much money is to be made from a captive audience with WoW, and want to emulate that model of control over their users. Which many people take issue with. I expect a LAN patch to show up not long after the game comes out. But the piecemeal release will have me waiting until a full boxed set of all 3 campaigns is released, anyway...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 27/08/09 @ 16:12
paulf
27/08/09 @ 15:11
#18
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the 100 player league system sounds like a great idea, and something that xbox live should 'borrow'
peak_performance
27/08/09 @ 15:16
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sunyavadin, how are they playing catchup exactly?If you're talking about "innovation", I for one am glad to see them not go after every other RTS game made since WC3, just as I'm glad not every FPS is playing with health regen just because Halo did it right.

Besides, Blizzard has never as far as I remember really innovated with their games (perhaps with the exception of Starcraft being designed from ground up to balance three different MP races against each other), and that's never stopped their games from being fun and selling tons of copies on top of that.
Apaar
27/08/09 @ 15:17
#20
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Quite likely the GOTY 2010, no matter the stiff competition. :)
JeremyRPS
27/08/09 @ 15:24
#21
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It sounds like they're really aiming to innovate the single player experience, and from all that I've heard of that aspect, it does indeed seem new and exciting. Innovation is funny because it quickly becomes schtick, and I am glad Blizzard didn't hop onto "control points" and things like that, we've already got plenty of Relic games (not that I'm knocking it, or saying that with sarcasm, I love their games too).
cianchristopher
27/08/09 @ 16:00
#22
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I love the Starcraft universe. I remember reading the backstories of each of the three races in the instruction booklet that came with Starcraft. They were really cool! These guys really put the time and effort into making their games seem extra-special and I for one am grateful.

I've never played World of Warcraft (don't really like MMOs), but I think every one of their previous games from Lost Vikings to Warcraft III were superb. A model for all developers, really!

Quick question, is the new battle.net kinda like Steam? In that once I own a game, I can download it as many times as I like?
Eury
27/08/09 @ 16:06
#23
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Quick question, is the new battle.net kinda like Steam? In that once I own a game, I can download it as many times as I like? "

Yes, in fact that feature have been in their Blizzard store for over a year now.
http://www.blizzard.com/store/

Create an account, register all your Blizzard cd keys, and you can download the games whenever you want.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 27/08/09 @ 17:25
Arkanite
27/08/09 @ 16:27
#24
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sooooo looking forward to this.

Currently travelling at the moment, and have starcraft on my netbook, going through all the campaign maps again (without cheats enabled...)
Hopefully the single player action will be brilliant as ever!
rob76
27/08/09 @ 16:29
#25
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Sunyavadin

Blizzard openly said there won't be major innovations and in a way I'm glad this is the case because the way they created and excellently balanced the 3 races is still unparalelled. Just finished playing Supreme Commander which is a very good RTS but still doesn't have the diversity amongst the races like Starcraft has. IMO Starcraft is still the very best RTS ever even though it's now dated visually.
Alithian
27/08/09 @ 17:23
#26
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This article made me cream my pants. With semen. Thank you.
hiddenranbir
27/08/09 @ 17:43
#27
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The Terran campaign alone is larger than the original's campaign, with all three put together. I think that is a big meal.
Rack
27/08/09 @ 18:12
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Might play the single player, but I think he has no idea how dispiriting Starcraft is online. He's right that single player doesn't prepare you for online, but they're not even in the same genre. Click speed is so brutally overpoweringly significant that no matter how many features you add to try and stop smurfing there just won't be any players at the lower end playing because the idea of memorising build queues and hotkeys just isn't appealing.

I'd love to see these features in other games though, in particular the localised ranking. A lot of other games just tell you you're 57,833 and not even out of how many players.
UncleLou
27/08/09 @ 18:48
#29
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Blizzard are playing catchup in the RTS game. They've been out so long they want to emulate all the innovations since their last title.

Nah. Blizzard have never been about major innovations, but about games that are polished to perfection and are simply a joy to play. Blizzard fans know this. Only a fool would expect much else and end up disappointed.
Jetset_UK
27/08/09 @ 19:54
#30
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I love the sound of the matched online games. I'm a muppet at online RTS and like the idea of grabbing the odd win. Hope it works.
hiddenranbir
27/08/09 @ 20:55
#31
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah, I'm by nature a slow builder.
aids
28/08/09 @ 00:48
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmm...loved the original SC but after playing Dawn of War and Company of Heroes, SC2 seems a step backwards.
mashk
28/08/09 @ 07:50
#33
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Have the 'minimum' and 'recommended' specs been released yet?
Canyarion
28/08/09 @ 09:20
#34
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds awesome. I'm really looking forward to the singleplayer and all the fun custom maps people will make. I might give multiplayer a try, I did pretty well in WC3. But I hated the smurfing.

The marketplace makes me wonder: what stops me from copying a mod that others are selling? I might see a good idea for a game, steal it and make my own version. For half the price, or free. How are they going to deal with that?

Also, who thinks that those 7 levels of competition will be quickly brought down to 5 and then eventually 3?

Edit: "The DoTA surpassing W3 confuses me, surely there can only be as many Dota people as there are W3 copies?"
I assumed they meant the amount of games online games played. Gamers play DotA more often than regular WC3 games.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 28/08/09 @ 10:32
Eury
28/08/09 @ 09:34
#35
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Also, who thinks that those 7 levels of competition will be quickly brought down to 5 and then eventually 3?

There are already 12 million active unique users on Battle.net, I wouldn't worry about it.
c0d3m45t3r
28/08/09 @ 10:29
#36
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
how long you think it will take for someone to create a WoW game with that mapeditor?
notmyrealname
30/08/09 @ 10:35
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm the only person alive it seems that thinks that SC1 has tired old ''twitching'' mechanics and is inferior to many other strategy games (already in it's time).

Not saying it's a bad game, am saying that SC2 will probably not be the second coming. And judging from the trailers, it will be very ''samey'', something I hoped blizzard would have wanted to avoid. 90s game in 2010? ... ok...
Vixremento
30/08/09 @ 18:31
#38
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So it will take a long time for each of the expansions (although surely an expansion is usually cheaper than the original full game?...ah whatever don't mind me) to follow on from the original?

I've read all the info on battle.net (2) and it looks nice and all but I really don't care about hooking up with friends in facebook (and especially not with people that I game with)...but yet here we are with a delayed released (yes I'm sore about it still) not because of the game being incomplete but rather because of achievements and "facebooking" features being build into and around battle.net. I do however understand that they couldn't release the game without these features (otherwise they probably wouldn't be used...just like most people never go SLi once they've already bought a system with just one graphics card) but it still just ticks me off (so yes I'm just letting out some steam).

Anyway...here's hoping they don't try to mess around too much with the basic RTS formula that has made RTS fun to play - thankfully I'm sure they must have considered and thrashed through everything by now (or well at least by next year sometime when they release) to make it a fun game to play. I probably also won't ever use battle.net to play "random" people online (because no matter what there'll be a 12 year old asthma-pump wielding chap on the other end waiting to hand my ass to me) but rather real people I know (in which case I get to be the 30+ year old fat nerd dude handing their ass to them - LAN FTW!).
gmjapan
02/09/09 @ 10:14
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
'smurfing' had a practical use too, people in WIII got stuck with no-one new to play.

Watching Starcraft replays became comical as players clicked 20 times a second on the ground because clicks per minute (or w/e) was the way a players skill was judged. Any new system of player ranking should track your pointless clicks.

Comments: 1-39 of 39 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery