Jump to navigation

Squenix wins copyright suit Comments by Games Industry.biz

11 December, 2007

Music vid plagiarised FF.

Read entire article.

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-22 of 22 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
ShieldOfFaith
11/12/07 @ 10:40
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
80% eh. Every FPS uses 99% of somebody elses work yet are allowed to be sold on a daily basis. Actually when you think about it, every game is just a rip off of another game. Developers have no choice as they've run out of new ideas since originality died over a decade ago.
Xiaokiraa
11/12/07 @ 10:46
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The video was very close to the original, and i thought was quite amusing. Stupid lawsuit in my opinion! lol
GamesConnoisseur
11/12/07 @ 10:48
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Same old arguments, there are only seven kind of stories, and everything is reinventions of any or some of those.

Orginiality is how you differ from the mass, having unseen features to date, or new way of using the old feature.

If you think all the game is 100 percent the same or just a clone of the previous similar game, then there is no purpose at all to get Super Mario Galaxy, The Portal (of The Orange Box) or Drake's Fortune!
Noctilucent
11/12/07 @ 11:02
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good thing you posted this here, too, because I can comment on two mistakes I found, which I could not do on gamesindustry.biz

1. Advent Children is not a videogame, it is a movie.
2. Final Fantasy turned 20 this year.

I wouldn't expect such mistakes on a high-profile gaming site such as yours. Doesn't anybody check things for accuracy?
HyperShadow
11/12/07 @ 11:05
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
But the video copies a heck of a lot of Advent Children, the church fight scene iirc, and when its copied to such exact details, thats when it gets wrong.

It wasn't like Advent Children, it WAS Advent Children. I side with Squeenix on this one.
Raziel
11/12/07 @ 11:09
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Link to video?
craigy [staff]
11/12/07 @ 11:18
#7
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ShieldOfFaith: do you have the exact date that originality died out? "over a decade ago" is a big vague for me.
nilay
11/12/07 @ 11:18
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
yep this was an exact copy of advent children but with a rubbish song over the top and dance scenes
but squeenix only took such a small amount of money i woulda thought it would be larger
makememoo
11/12/07 @ 11:19
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think people will miss the point of this. they have to do things like this regularly to ensure that courts continue to note that they are actively enforcing their IP/Trademarks.

Yeah this might not be a big deal really, but if they let things like this slide then when a serious case goes to court defendants can use un-enforced infringement to argue that Squeenix hasn't been active in the past and therefore have less of a case now.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 11/12/07 @ 11:19
Slamhound
11/12/07 @ 11:21
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I bet the author of webcomic RPG World is bricking himself right now.
Moz
11/12/07 @ 11:25
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Link to video?"

Go to Youtube and search "Ivy - Temptation of Sonata"

Is a brilliant video though they really should have asked permission from Square I'm they would have given it gladly as it expands awareness of their product.

But as mentioned above you have to keep on top of your IP if you start letting people get away with using it with out your concent then it becomes diluted and hard to keep hold of.
HiddenAway
11/12/07 @ 11:44
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Freek
11/12/07 @ 11:54
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow, how did they expect to get away with that?
It's an almost literal shot by shot copy job except with real actors.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 11/12/07 @ 11:54
NewYork
11/12/07 @ 12:23
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Damn Koreans.
kingdumpalot
11/12/07 @ 12:39
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
10 year history? We're arbitrarily ignoring the first six games then?
Nikanoru
11/12/07 @ 13:15
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
10 year history? We're arbitrarily ignoring the first six games then?

Sony wouldn't want anyone to know there was anything before Final Fantasy 7 on the Sony Playstation. ;)
kangarootoo
11/12/07 @ 13:28
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@makememoo

+1
bdc
11/12/07 @ 15:00
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ShieldofFaith, you have no idea what this copyright suit is about. There is a more than subtle difference between using similair ideas and actually copying frame for frame. If I copied and pasted Halo and called it Gaylo, that's copyright theft. If I made a whole new game with aliens and pink space ships and jeeps and a main character clad in green battle armor, that's me using the same ideas as Halo - but not actually copyright theft. You can't copyright general premises and themes.

Of course, I do realize you were using this case as a platform for your tired anti-FPS soapbox bullshit. Just try a little harder next time eh, chap?
_Price_
11/12/07 @ 15:26
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Heh. Alternate ending FTW.

I'm a little surprised they went straight to the courts, would have been more PR-savvy to try and negotiate a fee first (assuming they didn't that is).
wakka2k5
11/12/07 @ 16:33
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
OMG how blatent is that, i means seriously, copyright lasts for the life if the original creator and 50 years after their death......god thats just stupid to copy
hjarg
11/12/07 @ 16:40
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'd rather sue them for raping Beethoven's "Elise", but that's just me.
Hamflank
11/12/07 @ 17:16
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
10.900 us dollar, that's like... 200 euro.

Comments: 1-22 of 22 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Advertisement

X View gallery